Moose FAQ: Expand "Can I turn off type constraint checking?"

[gitmo/Moose.git] / lib / Moose / Manual / FAQ.pod

diff --git a/lib/Moose/Manual/FAQ.pod b/lib/Moose/Manual/FAQ.pod
index 422b5c8..5a8cda0 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/Moose/Manual/FAQ.pod
+++ b/lib/Moose/Manual/FAQ.pod
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ coercions, and C<lazy_build>, so subclassing is often not the ideal
 route.
 
 That said, if you really need to inherit from a non-Moose class, see
-L<Moose::Cookbook::Basics::Recipe11> for an example of how to do it,
+L<Moose::Cookbook::Basics::DateTime_ExtendingNonMooseParent> for an example of how to do it,
 or take a look at L<Moose::Manual::MooseX/"MooseX::NonMoose">.
 
 =head2 Accessors
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ NOTE: This B<cannot> be set globally in Moose, as that would break
 other classes which are built with Moose. You can still save on typing
 by defining a new C<MyApp::Moose> that exports Moose's sugar and then
 turns on L<MooseX::FollowPBP>. See
-L<Moose::Cookbook::Extending::Recipe4>.
+L<Moose::Cookbook::Extending::Mooseish_MooseSugar>.
 
 =head3 How can I inflate/deflate values in accessors?
 
@@ -266,7 +266,13 @@ C<NaturalLessThanTen> constraint check.
 
 =head3 Can I turn off type constraint checking?
 
-Not yet. This option may come in a future release.
+There's no support for it in the core of Moose yet. This option may
+come in a future release.
+
+Meanwhile there's a L<MooseX
+extension|MooseX::Attribute::TypeConstraint::CustomizeFatal> that
+allows you to do this on a per-attribute basis, and if it doesn't do
+what you it's easy to write one that fits your use case.
 
 =head3 My coercions stopped working with recent Moose, why did you break it?