Thing2->import::into($target, qw(import arguments));
}
+Note: you don't need to do anything more clever than this provided you
+document that people wanting to re-export your module should also be using
+L<Import::Into>. In fact, for a single module you can simply do:
+
+ sub import {
+ ...
+ Thing1->import::into(scalar caller);
+ }
+
+Notably, this works:
+
+ use base qw(Exporter);
+
+ sub import {
+ shift->export_to_level(1);
+ Thing1->import::into(scalar caller);
+ }
+
=head1 DESCRIPTION
Writing exporters is a pain. Some use L<Exporter>, some use L<Sub::Exporter>,
$thing->import;
-So, the solution is:
+because they're designed to affect the code currently being compiled - so
+within an eval, that's the scope of the eval itself, not the module that
+just C<use>d you - so
+
+ sub import {
+ eval "use strict;"
+ }
+
+doesn't do what you wanted, but
+
+ sub import {
+ strict->import;
+ }
+
+will apply L<strict> to the calling file correctly.
+
+Of course, now you have two new problems - first, that you still need to
+know if something's a pragma, and second that you can't use either of
+these approaches alone on something like L<Moose> or L<Moo> that's both
+an exporter and a pragma.
+
+So, the complete solution is:
my $sub = eval "package $target; sub { shift->import(\@_) }";
$sub->($thing, @import_args);
which means that import is called from the right place for pragmas to take
-effect, and from the right package for caller checking to work.
+effect, and from the right package for caller checking to work - and so
+behaves correctly for all types of exporter, for pragmas, and for hybrids.
Remembering all this, however, is excessively irritating. So I wrote a module
so I didn't have to anymore. Loading L<Import::Into> will create a method