close over the coercion sub separately

[gitmo/Moose.git] / lib / Moose / Manual / MethodModifiers.pod

package Moose::Manual::MethodModifiers;

# ABSTRACT: Moose's method modifiers

__END__

=pod

=head1 WHAT IS A METHOD MODIFIER?

Moose provides a feature called "method modifiers". You can also think
of these as "hooks" or "advice".

It's probably easiest to understand this feature with a few examples:

  package Example;

  use Moose;

  sub foo {
      print "    foo\n";
  }

  before 'foo' => sub { print "about to call foo\n"; };
  after 'foo'  => sub { print "just called foo\n"; };

  around 'foo' => sub {
      my $orig = shift;
      my $self = shift;

      print "  I'm around foo\n";

      $self->$orig(@_);

      print "  I'm still around foo\n";
  };

Now if I call C<< Example->new->foo >> I'll get the following output:

  about to call foo
    I'm around foo
      foo
    I'm still around foo
  just called foo

You probably could have figured that out from the names "before",
"after", and "around".

Also, as you can see, the before modifiers come before around
modifiers, and after modifiers come last.

When there are multiple modifiers of the same type, the before and
around modifiers run from the last added to the first, and after
modifiers run from first added to last:

   before 2
    before 1
     around 2
      around 1
       primary
      around 1
     around 2
    after 1
   after 2

=head1 WHY USE THEM?

Method modifiers have many uses. They are often used in roles to alter the
behavior of methods in the classes that consume the role. See
L<Moose::Manual::Roles> for more information about roles.

Since modifiers are mostly useful in roles, some of the examples below
are a bit artificial. They're intended to give you an idea of how
modifiers work, but may not be the most natural usage.

=head1 BEFORE, AFTER, AND AROUND

Method modifiers can be used to add behavior to a method that Moose
generates for you, such as an attribute accessor:

  has 'size' => ( is => 'rw' );

  before 'size' => sub {
      my $self = shift;

      if (@_) {
          Carp::cluck('Someone is setting size');
      }
  };

Another use for the before modifier would be to do some sort of
prechecking on a method call. For example:

  before 'size' => sub {
      my $self = shift;

      die 'Cannot set size while the person is growing'
          if @_ && $self->is_growing;
  };

This lets us implement logical checks that don't make sense as type
constraints. In particular, they're useful for defining logical rules
about an object's state changes.

Similarly, an after modifier could be used for logging an action that
was taken.

Note that the return values of both before and after modifiers are
ignored.

An around modifier is more powerful than either a before or
after modifier. It can modify the arguments being passed to the
original method, and you can even decide to simply not call the
original method at all. You can also modify the return value with an
around modifier.

An around modifier receives the original method as its first argument,
I<then> the object, and finally any arguments passed to the method.

  around 'size' => sub {
      my $orig = shift;
      my $self = shift;

      return $self->$orig()
          unless @_;

      my $size = shift;
      $size = $size / 2
          if $self->likes_small_things();

      return $self->$orig($size);
  };

C<before>, C<after>, and C<around> can also modify multiple methods
at once. The simplest example of this is passing them as a list:

  before [qw(foo bar baz)] => sub {
      warn "something is being called!";
  };

This will add a C<before> modifier to each of the C<foo>, C<bar>,
and C<baz> methods in the current class, just as though a separate
call to C<before> was made for each of them. The list can be passed
either as a bare list, or as an arrayref. Note that the name of the
function being modified isn't passed in in any way; this syntax is
only intended for cases where the function being modified doesn't
actually matter. If the function name does matter, use something like this:

  for my $func (qw(foo bar baz)) {
      before $func => sub {
          warn "$func was called!";
      };
  }

In addition, you can specify a regular expression to indicate the
methods to wrap, like so:

  after qr/^command_/ => sub {
      warn "got a command";
  };

This will match the regular expression against each method name
returned by L<Class::MOP::Class/get_method_list>, and add a modifier
to each one that matches. The same caveats apply as above. Using regular
expressions to determine methods to wrap is quite a bit more powerful
than the previous alternatives, but it's also quite a bit more
dangerous. In particular, you should make sure to avoid wrapping
methods with a special meaning to Moose or Perl, such as C<meta>, C<new>,
C<BUILD>, C<DESTROY>, C<AUTOLOAD>, etc., as this could cause
unintended (and hard to debug) problems.

=head1 INNER AND AUGMENT

Augment and inner are two halves of the same feature. The augment
modifier provides a sort of inverted subclassing. You provide part of
the implementation in a superclass, and then document that subclasses
are expected to provide the rest.

The superclass calls C<inner()>, which then calls the C<augment>
modifier in the subclass:

  package Document;

  use Moose;

  sub as_xml {
      my $self = shift;

      my $xml = "<document>\n";
      $xml .= inner();
      $xml .= "</document>\n";

      return $xml;
  }

Using C<inner()> in this method makes it possible for one or more
subclasses to then augment this method with their own specific
implementation:

  package Report;

  use Moose;

  extends 'Document';

  augment 'as_xml' => sub {
      my $self = shift;

      my $xml = "  <report>\n";
      $xml .= inner();
      $xml .= "  </report>\n";

      return $xml;
  };

When we call C<as_xml> on a Report object, we get something like this:

  <document>
    <report>
    </report>
  </document>

But we also called C<inner()> in C<Report>, so we can continue
subclassing and adding more content inside the document:

  package Report::IncomeAndExpenses;

  use Moose;

  extends 'Report';

  augment 'as_xml' => sub {
      my $self = shift;

      my $xml = '    <income>' . $self->income . '</income>';
      $xml .= "\n";
      $xml .= '    <expenses>' . $self->expenses . '</expenses>';
      $xml .= "\n";

      $xml .= inner() || q{};

      return $xml;
  };

Now our report has some content:

  <document>
    <report>
      <income>$10</income>
      <expenses>$8</expenses>
    </report>
  </document>

What makes this combination of C<augment> and C<inner()> special is
that it allows us to have methods which are called from parent (least
specific) to child (most specific). This inverts the normal
inheritance pattern.

Note that in C<Report::IncomeAndExpenses> we call C<inner()> again. If the
object is an instance of C<Report::IncomeAndExpenses> then this call is a
no-op, and just returns false. It's a good idea to always call C<inner()> to
allow for future subclassing.

=head1 OVERRIDE AND SUPER

Finally, Moose provides some simple sugar for Perl's built-in method
overriding scheme. If you want to override a method from a parent
class, you can do this with C<override>:

  package Employee;

  use Moose;

  extends 'Person';

  has 'job_title' => ( is => 'rw' );

  override 'display_name' => sub {
      my $self = shift;

      return super() . q{, } . $self->title();
  };

The call to C<super()> is almost the same as calling C<<
$self->SUPER::display_name >>. The difference is that the arguments
passed to the superclass's method will always be the same as the ones
passed to the method modifier, and cannot be changed.

All arguments passed to C<super()> are ignored, as are any changes
made to C<@_> before C<super()> is called.

=head1 SEMI-COLONS

Because all of these method modifiers are implemented as Perl
functions, you must always end the modifier declaration with a
semi-colon:

  after 'foo' => sub { };

=cut