a note about social style
[gitmo/Moose.git] / lib / Moose / Cookbook / Style.pod
CommitLineData
9632a49e 1=pod
2
3=head1 NAME
4
5Moose::Cookbook::Style - How to cook Moose with style
6
7=for authors
8
9Please annotate all bad examples with comments so that they won't be copied by accodent
10
11=cut
12
13=head1 Benefits of Good Style
14
15Good Moose style, as defined by this document, helps ensure your code has the
16following desirable properties:
17
18=over 4
19
20=item Play well with others
21
22Your code will be more reusable and easier to extend.
23
24=item Ease maintenance
25
26The code will be easier to understand because it follows an accepted set of
27conventions and idioms.
28
29This will help others maintaining your code, and also help you to get support
30on IRC for instance.
31
32=item Help Moose generate better code
33
34By using the most appropriate features, the generated code will be safer and
35more efficient.
36
37=item Benefit from meta programming
38
39Code that operates on the metaclass will benefit from clean meta definitions.
40
41If you are manually converting argument types with C<around 'new'> there is no
42meta data explaining your intention. If on the other hand you use coercions,
43there is introspectable meta data that makes this clear.
44
45This means that e.g. MooseX extensions that work by introspecting your class
46will be able to do the right thing more often, because they don't need to
47guess.
48
49=back
50
51=head1 Don't change C<new>
52
53It is generally considered bad style to override L<Moose::Object/new> for a
54number of reasons.
55
56The first reason is consistency. Subclasses of your class and code
57instantiating your class would be simpler if your constructor works closer to
58the default.
59
60The second reason is performance. By calling C<make_immutable> on your metaclass:
61
62 __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
63
64And opting out of any class definition changes from that point on, you allow
65Moose to create more efficient versions of certain generic methods. Moose will
66generate a tight, optimal C<new> for you, based on the minimal set of features
67you use.
68
69Moose provides many features that allow you to do common object construction
70tasks at the right level of abstraction.
71
72When attributes have the ability to provide the necessary functionality, use
73that. If that isn't sufficient, L<Moose::Object> has numerous features you can
74use at construction time.
75
76=head2 Use C<BUILD> instead of custom initialization or overriding C<new>
77
78Instead of changing C<new>, do initialization in C<BUILD>.
79
80The construction parameters are passed in, so you don't need to replicate
81C<BUILDARGS>, and since C<BUILD> is called for each superclass that defines it,
82you will never forget to invoke your initializers if you extend them.
83
84=head2 Use C<default>, C<builder> or C<lazy_build>
85
86To initialize attributes there is a plethora of methods preferable to assigning
87the value at initialization time.
88
89If you want to translate parameter data, use coercions.
90
91If you want to ensure a parameter can't be overridden by the constructor, set
92the C<init_arg> to C<undef> instead of overwriting it in C<BUILD>.
93
94=head2 Use C<BUILDARGS> to alter C<@_> processing
95
96If you need to change the way L<@_> is processed, use C<BUILDARGS>, instead of
97wrapping C<new>. This ensures the behavior is subclassible, it keeps this logic
98independent of the other aspects of construction, and can be made efficient
99using C<make_immutable>.
100
101=head1 Don't pollute the global type registry
102
103=head2 Use fully qualified type names for your own data
104
105L<MooseX::Types> provides a convenient method to do this.
106
107If you define
108
109 # Bad style:
110
111 subtype Person => (
112 as 'Object',
113 where { $_->can("name") },
114 );
115
116Then the global name C<Person> is registered, and this could conflict with
117other bad usage of the sort.
118
119Instead, prefix type name with your project namespace, or class name:
120
121 subtype 'My::Foo::Person' => (
122 as 'Object',
123 where { $_->can("name") },
124 );
125
126Or with L<MooseX::Types>:
127
128 use MooseX::Types (
129 -declare => [qw(Person)],
130 );
131
132 subtype Person() => ( # note parenthesis, "Person" is a function, not a string
133 as 'Object',
134 where { $_->can("name") },
135 );
136
23306f77 137=head3 Coerce in a subtype
138
9632a49e 139Likewise use fully qualified subtypes of other types for defining coercions, so
140that they won't affect unrelated code, causing action at a distance.
141
142This is important because the type registry is global, kind of like the symbol
143table.
144
145This means that code like:
146
147 # Bad style:
148
149 coerce ArrayRef => (
150 from Str => via { [ split /,/ ] },
151 );
152
153Will add a coercion to B<all> attributes like:
154
155 has foo => (
156 isa => "ArrayRef",
157 coerce => 1,
158 );
159
160in a specific way.
161
d9fa4da9 162=head1 Clean up your package
163
164Use C<namespace::clean> or C<no Moose> to remove the sugar exports.
165
166This will make sure the sugar isn't accidentally called as methods on your objects.
167
168For instance:
169
170 $obj->can("has");
171
172will return true, even though C<has> is not a method.
173
a76e2bac 174=head1 Accept no hacks
175
176When you have a tricky requirement, refrain from abusing Moose or MooseX:: or
177whatever it is you are using.
178
179Instead, drop by IRC and discuss it. Most of the time a crazy idea can either
180be simplified, or it will spawn a clean, reliable feature to whatever package
181you are using.
182
183This will improve your code and also share the benefit with others.
9632a49e 184