this is broken, need to integrate the new Class::MOP stuff,.. this might take a while
[gitmo/Moose.git] / TODO
CommitLineData
8b59f8d6 1-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
43d599e5 2 BUGS
3-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
5mst: if I do "subtype 'Foo' => as 'Bar';" I get an empty condition and it dies
6
7-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8b59f8d6 8TODO
9-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10
715ea0b7 11- should handle some moose-specific options in &Moose::Meta::Class::create
12 things like roles, and method modifiers (although those can probably be
13 ignored if i want to)
14
8b59f8d6 15- type unions
16
17Add support for doing it with Classes which do not have
18a type constraint yet created
19
20- type intersections
21
22Mostly just for Roles
23
24- inherited slot specs
25
db1ab48d 26'does' can be added to,.. but not changed
27(need type unions for this)
8b59f8d6 28
8b59f8d6 29- proxy attributes
30
db1ab48d 31a proxied attribute is an attribute
32which looks like an attribute,
33talks like an attribute, smells
34like an attribute,.. but if you
35look behind the curtain,.. its
36over there.. in that other object
37
38(... probably be a custom metaclass)
8b59f8d6 39
40- compile time extends
41
42[00:39] sri but maybe a better syntax for compile time extends
43[00:39] stevan I have been pondering that actually
44[00:39] sri use Moose extends => Foo::Bar
45[00:40] stevan I think now that we have the Sub::Exporter stuff
46 in, that kinda thing should be pretty easy
47
8245db56 48nothingmuch notes that all the constructs should be supported in the entirety of the use clause:
49
50 use Moose (
51 has => foo (
52 ....
53 ),
54 );
55
56and that if this usage style is used nothing is exported to the namespace.
57
8b59f8d6 58- default should dclone()
59
8a157bab 60- subtype $anon_subtype => where { ... }
61
62[22:56] stevan sub mst_doesnt_like_to_type { (shift)->meta->attr->type_contstraint }
63[22:57] mst err
64[22:57] stevan :P
65[22:57] stevan are you wanting to reuse it or something?
66[22:57] stevan my $subtype = subtype 'Something' => where { ... };
67[22:58] stevan then you can do isa => $subtype
68[22:58] mst but I can't subtype it again
69[22:59] stevan mst: ahhh...
70[22:59] mst well, I can. but it suddenly gets very "long way round" ish
71[23:00] stevan my $constraint = Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint->new(
72[23:00] stevan name => $name || '__ANON__',
73[23:00] stevan parent => $parent,
74[23:00] stevan constraint => $check,
75[23:00] stevan message => $message,
76[23:00] stevan );
77[23:00] stevan yeah thats kinda the long way
78[23:00] stevan mst: what would you like it to be?
79[23:00] mst $parent = find_type_constraint($parent) if defined $parent;
80[23:00] mst if $parent is already a type constraint
81[23:00] mst skip that bit
82[23:00] stevan hmm
83[23:00] mst should be all you need to change
84[23:00] stevan yeah
85[23:01] stevan so you can then say
86[23:01] stevan subtype $anon => where { ... };
87[23:01] mst right
88[23:01] stevan ok
89
90- method keyword
91
92[23:37] mst more seriously, I'd still like a "method" keyword or something
93[23:37] mst method 'foo' => sub { ... };
94[23:38] stevan what would it do more than sub foo { ... }?
95[23:39] stevan I would like multimethods actually
96[23:39] mst almost exactly nothing, to begin with
97[23:39] stevan but thats just cause I love CLOS and am reading a book on Dylan now
98[23:40] stevan keyword squating :)
99[23:40] mst but if we need to hook stuff later it's bloody handy to already have people writing it that way
100[23:40] mst right
101...
102[23:49] mst oh, also: method 'has' => sub { ... } could squelch the redefine warning
43d599e5 103
f90e052d 104- local coerce
105
106[13:16] mst stevan: slight problem with coerce
107[13:16] mst I only get to declare it once
108[13:17] mst so if I'm trying to declare it cast-style per-source-class rather than per-target-class
109[13:17] mst I am extremely screwed
110[13:17] stevan yes
111[13:17] stevan they are not class specific
112[13:18] stevan they are attached to the type constraint itself
113[13:18] * stevan ponders anon-coercion-metaobjects
114[13:18] mst yes, that's fine
115[13:19] mst but when I declare a class
116[13:19] mst I want to be able to say "this class coerces to X type via <this>"
117[13:19] stevan yeah something like that
118[13:19] stevan oh,.. hmm
119[13:20] stevan sort of like inflate/deflate?
120[13:20] stevan around the accessors?
121[13:25] * bluefeet has quit (Remote host closed the connection)
122[13:27] mst no
123[13:27] mst nothing like that
124[13:27] mst like a cast
125[13:31] mst stevan: $obj->foo($bar); where 'foo' expects a 'Foo' object
126[13:31] mst stevan: is effectively <Foo>$bar, right?
127[13:32] mst stevan: I want to be able to say in package Bar
128[13:32] mst stevan: coerce_to 'Foo' via { ... };
129[13:32] mst etc.
130[13:53] stevan hmm
131
132
8b59f8d6 133-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
134TO PONDER
135-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
136
137- Moose "strict" mode
138
139use Moose 'strict'; This would allow us to have all sort of expensive tests
140which can be turned off in prod.
141
142- Moose::Philosophy.pod
143
144To explain Moose from a very high level
145
687e52bb 146- moosedoc
8b59f8d6 147
687e52bb 148We certainly have enough meta-information to make pretty complete POD docs.
8b59f8d6 149
150
8245db56 151