my $V_NUM_REGEXP = qr{v?[0-9._]+}; # crudely, a v-string or decimal
+my $PKG_FIRST_WORD_REGEXP = qr{ # the FIRST word in a package name
+ [a-zA-Z_] # the first word CANNOT start with a digit
+ (?:
+ [\w']? # can contain letters, digits, _, or ticks
+ \w # But, NO multi-ticks or trailing ticks
+ )*
+}x;
+
+my $PKG_ADDL_WORD_REGEXP = qr{ # the 2nd+ word in a package name
+ \w # the 2nd+ word CAN start with digits
+ (?:
+ [\w']? # and can contain letters or ticks
+ \w # But, NO multi-ticks or trailing ticks
+ )*
+}x;
+
+my $PKG_NAME_REGEXP = qr{ # match a package name
+ (?: :: )? # a pkg name can start with aristotle
+ $PKG_FIRST_WORD_REGEXP # a package word
+ (?:
+ (?: :: )+ ### aristotle (allow one or many times)
+ $PKG_ADDL_WORD_REGEXP ### a package word
+ )* # ^ zero, one or many times
+ (?:
+ :: # allow trailing aristotle
+ )?
+}x;
+
my $PKG_REGEXP = qr{ # match a package declaration
^[\s\{;]* # intro chars on a line
package # the word 'package'
\s+ # whitespace
- ([\w:]+) # a package name
+ ($PKG_NAME_REGEXP) # a package name
\s* # optional whitespace
($V_NUM_REGEXP)? # optional version number
\s* # optional whitesapce
Returns a list of packages. Note: this is a raw list of packages
discovered (or assumed, in the case of C<main>). It is not
filtered for C<DB>, C<main> or private packages the way the
-C<provides> method does.
+C<provides> method does. Invalid package names are not returned,
+for example "Foo:Bar". Strange but valid package names are
+returned, for example "Foo::Bar::", and are left up to the caller
+on how to handle.
=item C<< pod_inside() >>