From: Peter Rabbitson <ribasushi@cpan.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:25:05 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: Make it clearer in examples that bool takes expressions
X-Git-Tag: v1.75~13
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=dbsrgits%2FSQL-Abstract.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=23401b818b099397e04df91b43340ecd59e8f92b

Make it clearer in examples that bool takes expressions

timbunce++
---

diff --git a/Changes b/Changes
index cbe7d4b..3e8ae4b 100644
--- a/Changes
+++ b/Changes
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Revision history for SQL::Abstract
     - Fix false negative comparison of ORDER BY <function> ASC
     - More improvements of incorrect parsing (literal at end of list elt)
     - Fix typos in POD and comments (RT#87776)
+    - Augment -not_bool example with nesting (RT#89601)
 
 revision 1.74  2013-06-04
 ----------------------------
diff --git a/lib/SQL/Abstract.pm b/lib/SQL/Abstract.pm
index f325978..d017b85 100644
--- a/lib/SQL/Abstract.pm
+++ b/lib/SQL/Abstract.pm
@@ -2310,15 +2310,19 @@ then you should use the and/or operators:-
     my %where  = (
         -and           => [
             -bool      => 'one',
-            -bool      => 'two',
-            -bool      => 'three',
-            -not_bool  => 'four',
+            -not_bool  => { two=> { -rlike => 'bar' } },
+            -not_bool  => { three => [ { '=', 2 }, { '>', 5 } ] },
         ],
     );
 
 Would give you:
 
-    WHERE one AND two AND three AND NOT four
+    WHERE
+      one
+        AND
+      (NOT two RLIKE ?)
+        AND
+      (NOT ( three = ? OR three > ? ))
 
 
 =head2 Nested conditions, -and/-or prefixes