Fixed "its" vs "it's"

[catagits/Catalyst-Runtime.git] / t / unit_controller_config.t

diff --git a/t/unit_controller_config.t b/t/unit_controller_config.t
index d99471c..397882c 100755 (executable)
--- a/t/unit_controller_config.t
+++ b/t/unit_controller_config.t
@@ -34,11 +34,11 @@ use_ok('Catalyst');
     package controller_a;
 
     use base 'base_controller';
-    
+
     __PACKAGE__->config( key_a => 'value_a' );
 }
-        
-        
+
+
 {
     package controller_b;
 
@@ -55,26 +55,26 @@ use_ok('Catalyst');
 ## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 ## THE TESTS.  Basically we first check to make sure that all the children of
 ## the base_controller properly inherit the {base_key => 'base_value'} info
-## and that each of the children also has it's local config data and that none
+## and that each of the children also has its local config data and that none
 ## of the classes have data that is unexpected.
 ## ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
 # First round, does everything have what we expect to find? If these tests fail there is something
-# wrong with the way config is storing it's information.
+# wrong with the way config is storing its information.
 
 ok( base_controller->config->{base_key} eq 'base_value', 'base_controller has expected config value for "base_key"') or
  diag('"base_key" defined as "'.base_controller->config->{base_key}.'" and not "base_value" in config');
 
 ok( controller_a->config->{base_key} eq 'base_value', 'controller_a has expected config value for "base_key"') or
  diag('"base_key" defined as "'.controller_a->config->{base_key}.'" and not "base_value" in config');
- 
+
 ok( controller_a->config->{key_a} eq 'value_a', 'controller_a has expected config value for "key_a"') or
  diag('"key_a" defined as "'.controller_a->config->{key_a}.'" and not "value_a" in config');
 
 ok( controller_b->config->{base_key} eq 'base_value', 'controller_b has expected config value for "base_key"') or
  diag('"base_key" defined as "'.controller_b->config->{base_key}.'" and not "base_value" in config');
- 
+
 ok( controller_b->config->{key_b} eq 'value_b', 'controller_b has expected config value for "key_b"') or
  diag('"key_b" defined as "'.controller_b->config->{key_b}.'" and not "value_b" in config');
 
@@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ ok( controller_b->config->{key_b} eq 'value_b', 'controller_b has expected confi
 
 ok( scalar(keys %{base_controller->config}) == 1, 'base_controller has the expected number of config values') or
  diag("base_controller should have 1 config value, but it has ".scalar(keys %{base_controller->config}));
- 
+
 ok( scalar(keys %{controller_a->config}) == 2, 'controller_a has the expected number of config values') or
  diag("controller_a  should have 2 config value, but it has ".scalar(keys %{base_controller->config}));
- 
+
 ok( scalar(keys %{controller_b->config}) == 2, 'controller_b has the expected number of config values') or
  diag("controller_a should have 2 config value, but it has ".scalar(keys %{base_controller->config}));