uses to determine how to match in incoming request to an action (or action chain)
in a controller.
+=head2 Request to Controller/Action Matching
+
+L<Catalyst> maps requests to action using a 'longest path wins' approach. That means
+that if the request is '/foo/bar/baz' That means the action 'baz' matches:
+
+ package MyApp::Controller::Foo;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub bar :Path('bar') Args(1) { ...}
+ sub baz :Path('bar/baz') Args(0) { ... }
+
+Path length matches take precedence over all other types of matches (included HTTP
+Method, Scheme, etc.). The same holds true for Chained actions. Generally the
+chain that matches the most PathParts wins.
+
+=head2 Args(N) versus Args
+
+'Args' matches any number of args. Because this functions as a sort of catchall, we
+treat 'Args' as the lowest precedence of any Args(N) when N is 0 to infinity. An
+action with 'Args' always get the last chance to match.
+
+=head2 When two or more actions match a given Path
+
+Sometimes two or more actions match the same path and all have the same PathPart
+length. For example:
+
+ package MyApp::Controller::Root;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub root :Chained(/) CaptureArgs(0) { }
+
+ sub one :Chained(root) PathPart('') Args(0) { }
+ sub two :Chained(root) PathPart('') Args(0) { }
+ sub three :Chained(root) PathPart('') Args(0) { }
+
+ __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
+
+In this case the last defined action wins (for the example that is action 'three').
+
+This is most common to happen when you are using action matching beyond paths, such as
+when using method matching:
+
+ package MyApp::Controller::Root;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub root :Chained(/) CaptureArgs(0) { }
+
+ sub any :Chained(root) PathPart('') Args(0) { }
+ sub get :GET Chained(root) PathPart('') Args(0) { }
+
+ __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
+
+In the above example GET /root could match both actions. In this case you should define
+your 'catchall' actions higher in the controller.
+
=head2 Type Constraints in Args and Capture Args
Beginning in Version 5.90090+ you may use L<Moose>, L<MooseX::Types> or L<Type::Tiny>
-type constraints to futher declare allowed matching for Args or CaptureArgs. Here
+type constraints to further declare allowed matching for Args or CaptureArgs. Here
is a simple example:
package MyApp::Controller::User;
use Moose;
use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+ use MooseX::Types::Moose qw(Int);
extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
In this case the incoming request "http://localhost:/user/100" would match the action
C<find> but "http://localhost:/user/not_a_number" would not. You may find declaring
-constraints in this manner aids with debuggin, automatic generation of documentation
-and reduces the amount of manual checking you might need to do in your actions. For
-example if the argument in the example action was going to be used to lookup a row
-in a database, if the matching field expected an integer a string might cause a database
+constraints in this manner aids with debugging, automatic generation of documentation
+and reducing the amount of manual checking you might need to do in your actions. For
+example if the argument in the given action was going to be used to lookup a row
+in a database, if the matching field expected an integer, a string might cause a database
exception, prompting you to add additional checking of the argument prior to using it.
+In general it is hoped this feature can lead to reduced validation boilerplate and more
+easily understood and declarative actions.
More than one argument may be added by comma separating your type constraint names, for
example:
+ use Types::Standard qw/Int Str/;
+
sub find :Path('') Args(Int,Int,Str) {
my ($self, $c, $int1, $int2, $str) = @_;
}
-Would require three arguments, an integer, integer and a string.
+Would require three arguments, an integer, integer and a string. Note in this example we
+constrained the args using imported types via L<Types::Standard>. Although you may use
+stringy Moose types, we recommend imported types since this is less ambiguous to your readers.
+If you want to use Moose stringy types. you must quote them (either "Int" or 'Int' is fine).
+
+Conversely, you should not quote types that are imported!
=head3 Using type constraints in a controller
By default L<Catalyst> allows all the standard, built-in, named type constraints that come
bundled with L<Moose>. However it is trivial to create your own Type constraint libraries
-and export them to controller that wish to use them. We recommend using L<Type::Tiny> or
+and export them to a controller that wishes to use them. We recommend using L<Type::Tiny> or
L<MooseX::Types> for this. Here is an example using some extended type constraints via
the L<Types::Standard> library that is packaged with L<Type::Tiny>:
use Moose;
use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
- use Types::Standard qw/StrMatch/;
-
+ use Types::Standard qw/StrMatch Int/;
+
extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
sub looks_like_a_date :Path('') Args(StrMatch[qr{\d\d-\d\d-\d\d}]) {
recommend looking at the copious documentation in L<Type::Tiny> or in L<MooseX::Types> if
you prefer that system. The author recommends L<Type::Tiny> if you are unsure which to use.
+=head3 Type constraint namespace.
+
+By default we assume the namespace which defines the type constraint is in the package
+which contains the action declaring the arg or capture arg. However if you do not wish
+to import type constraints into you package, you may use a fully qualified namespace for
+your type constraint. If you do this you must install L<Type::Tiny> which defines the
+code used to lookup and normalize the various types of Type constraint libraries.
+
+Example:
+
+ package MyApp::Example;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub an_int_ns :Local Args(MyApp::Types::Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $int) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('an_int (withrole)');
+ }
+
+Would basically work the same as:
+
+ package MyApp::Example;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+ use MyApp::Types 'Int';
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub an_int_ns :Local Args(Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $int) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('an_int (withrole)');
+ }
+
+=head3 namespace::autoclean
+
+If you want to use L<namespace::autoclean> in your controllers you must 'except' imported
+type constraints since the code that resolves type constraints in args / capture args
+run after the cleaning. For example:
+
+ package MyApp::Controller::Autoclean;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+ use namespace::autoclean -except => 'Int';
+ use MyApp::Types qw/Int/;
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub an_int :Local Args(Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $int) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('an_int (autoclean)');
+ }
+
+=head3 Using roles and base controller with type constraints
+
+If your controller is using a base class or a role that has an action with a type constraint
+you should declare your use of the type constraint in that role or base controller in the
+same way as you do in main controllers. Catalyst will try to find the package with declares
+the type constraint first by looking in any roles and then in superclasses. It will use the
+first package that defines the type constraint. For example:
+
+ package MyApp::Role;
+
+ use Moose::Role;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role;
+ use MyApp::Types qw/Int/;
+
+ sub an_int :Local Args(Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $int) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('an_int (withrole)');
+ }
+
+ sub an_int_ns :Local Args(MyApp::Types::Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $int) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('an_int (withrole)');
+ }
+
+ package MyApp::BaseController;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+ use MyApp::Types qw/Int/;
+
+ extends 'Catalyst::Controller';
+
+ sub from_parent :Local Args(Int) {
+ my ($self, $c, $id) = @_;
+ $c->res->body('from_parent $id');
+ }
+
+ package MyApp::Controller::WithRole;
+
+ use Moose;
+ use MooseX::MethodAttributes;
+
+ extends 'MyApp::BaseController';
+
+ with 'MyApp::Role';
+
+If you have complex controller hierarchy, we
+do not at this time attempt to look for all packages with a match type constraint, but instead
+take the first one found. In the future we may add code that attempts to insure a sane use
+of subclasses with type constraints but right now there are no clear use cases so report issues
+and interests.
+
=head3 Match order when more than one Action matches a path.
As previously described, L<Catalyst> will match 'the longest path', which generally means
-that named path / path_parts will take precidence over Args or CaptureArgs. However, what
+that named path / path_parts will take precedence over Args or CaptureArgs. However, what
will happen if two actions match the same path with equal args? For example:
sub an_int :Path(user) Args(Int) {
sub an_int :Path(user) Args(Int) {
}
-Now requests that match this path would first hit the 'an_int' action, and then the 'an_any'
-action, which it likely what you are looking for!
+Now requests that match this path would first hit the 'an_int' action and will check to see if
+the argument is an integer. If it is, then the action will execute, otherwise it will pass and
+the dispatcher will check the next matching action (in this case we fall through to the 'an_any'
+action).
=head3 Type Constraints and Chained Actions
Using type constraints in Chained actions works the same as it does for Path and Local or Global
-actions. The only difference is that you maybe declare type constraints on CaptureArgs as
+actions. The only difference is that you may declare type constraints on CaptureArgs as
well as Args. For Example:
+ use Types::Standard qw/Int Tuple/;
+
sub chain_base :Chained(/) CaptureArgs(1) { }
- sub any_priority_chain :Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
+ sub any_priority_chain :GET Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
sub int_priority_chain :Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
sub any_priority_link_any :Chained(link_any) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
- sub int_priority_link_any :Chained(link_any) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
-
+ sub int_priority_link_any :Chained(link_any) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
+
sub link_int :Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') CaptureArgs(Int) { }
- sub any_priority_link :Chained(link_int) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
+ sub any_priority_link :Chained(link_int) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
+
+ sub int_priority_link :Chained(link_int) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
- sub int_priority_link :Chained(link_int) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
+ sub link_int_int :Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') CaptureArgs(Int,Int) { }
-These chained actions migth create match tables like the following:
+ sub any_priority_link2 :Chained(link_int_int) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
+
+ sub int_priority_link2 :Chained(link_int_int) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
+
+ sub link_tuple :Chained(chain_base) PathPart('') CaptureArgs(Tuple[Int,Int,Int]) { }
+
+ sub any_priority_link3 :Chained(link_tuple) PathPart('') Args(1) { }
+
+ sub int_priority_link3 :Chained(link_tuple) PathPart('') Args(Int) { }
+
+These chained actions might create match tables like the following:
[debug] Loaded Chained actions:
- .----------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------.
- | Path Spec | Private |
- +----------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------+
- | /chain_base/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | => /any_priority_chain |
- | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | -> /link_int (1) |
- | | => /any_priority_link |
- | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | -> /link_any (1) |
- | | => /any_priority_link_any |
- | /chain_base/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | => /int_priority_chain |
- | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | -> /link_int (1) |
- | | => /int_priority_link |
- | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
- | | -> /link_any (1) |
- | | => /int_priority_link_any |
- '----------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------'
+ .-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------.
+ | Path Spec | Private |
+ +-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
+ | /chain_base/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | => GET /any_priority_chain (1) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_int (Int) |
+ | | => /any_priority_link (1) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_int_int (Int,Int) |
+ | | => /any_priority_link2 (1) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_tuple (Tuple[Int,Int,Int]) |
+ | | => /any_priority_link3 (1) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_any (1) |
+ | | => /any_priority_link_any (1) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_tuple (Tuple[Int,Int,Int]) |
+ | | -> /link2_int (UserId) |
+ | | => GET /finally (Int) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/*/*/... | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_tuple (Tuple[Int,Int,Int]) |
+ | | -> /link2_int (UserId) |
+ | | => GET /finally2 (...) |
+ | /chain_base/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | => /int_priority_chain (Int) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_int (Int) |
+ | | => /int_priority_link (Int) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_int_int (Int,Int) |
+ | | => /int_priority_link2 (Int) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_tuple (Tuple[Int,Int,Int]) |
+ | | => /int_priority_link3 (Int) |
+ | /chain_base/*/*/* | /chain_base (1) |
+ | | -> /link_any (1) |
+ | | => /int_priority_link_any (Int) |
+ '-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------'
As you can see the same general path could be matched by various action chains. In this case
the rule described in the previous section should be followed, which is that L<Catalyst>
will start with the last defined action and work upward. For example the action C<int_priority_chain>
would be checked before C<any_priority_chain>. The same applies for actions that are midway links
in a longer chain. In this case C<link_int> would be checked before C<link_any>. So as always we
-recommend that you place you priority or most constrainted actions last and you least or catch-all
+recommend that you place you priority or most constrained actions last and you least or catch-all
actions first.
Although this reverse order checking may seen counter intuitive it does have the added benefit that
when inheriting controllers any new actions added would take check precedence over those in your
parent controller or consumed role.
-=head1 Conclusion
-
- TBD
+Please note that your declared type constraint names will now appear in the debug console.
=head1 Author
projects / catagits/Catalyst-Runtime.git / blobdiff