# Known Bugs: - Bug ->go or ->visit causes actions which have Args or CaptureArgs called twice when called via ->go or ->visit. Test app: http://github.com/bobtfish/catalyst-app-bug-go_chain/tree/master # Compatibility warnings to add: - $self->config should warn as config should only ever be called as a class method (TESTS). # Proposed functionality / feature additions: ## Log setup needs to be less lame So Catalyst::Plugin::Log::* can die in a fire. Having $c->log_class would be a good start. kane volunteered to do some of this. Simple example: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Colorful should just be a subclass of Catalyst::Log, no ::Plugin:: needed. See also: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Dispatch and http://github.com/willert/catalyst-plugin-log4perl-simple/tree # REFACTORING ## The horrible hack for plugin setup - replacing it: * Have a look at the Devel::REPL BEFORE_PLUGIN stuff I wonder if what we need is that combined with plugins-as-roles ## App / ctx split: NOTE - these are notes that t0m thought up after doing back compat for catalyst_component_class, may be inaccurate, wrong or missing things bug mst (at least) to correct before trying more than the first 2 steps. Please knock yourself out on the first two however :) - Eliminate actions in MyApp from the main test suite - Uncomment warning in C::C::register_action_methods, add tests it works by mocking out the logging.. - Remove MyApp @ISA controller (ask metaclass if it has attributes, and if so you need back compat :/) - Make Catalyst::Context, move the per request stuff in there, handles from main app class to delegate - Make an instance of the app class which is a global variable - Make new instance of the context class, not the app class per-request - Remove the components as class data, move to instance data on the app class (you probably have to do this for _all_ the class data, good luck!) - Make it possible for users to spin up different instances of the app class (with different config etc each) - Profit! (Things like changing the complete app config per vhost, i.e. writing a config loader / app class role which dispatches per vhost to differently configured apps is piss easy) ## GSOC ### Next large steps: - Moving setup_components etc into the container - Move setup_components down into the container (setup_components becomes a one or two line method in Catalyst.pm) - refactor / cleanup setup_component - Move locate_components - Move contents of setup_components - Finished documentation for ::IOC parts. - Creating service()-like sugar for component - Test cases for extending the container in an application. - Using the sugar added in the previous item - Test when Model::Foo depends_on Model::Bar - Allowing people to change component lifecycles role Service::WithAcceptContext {} role Service::WithCOMPONENT {} class Service::CatalystComponent extends Service with (WithAcceptContext, WithCOMPONENT) {} a) configure additional services in that container - super simple container $default_container => as { more services }; class MyApp::Container extends Catalyst::Container { use Bread::Board; # Or our own sugar? method BUILD { container $self => as { service model => ...; # some constructor injection to MyApp::Model or something container Model => as { component Foo => (dependencies => ['/model']); # As per default! component Bar => (dependencies => ['/model/Foo']); # Magic! }; # Note - implementation of BB may need to be changed to support making sure existing # services actually get overridden. not sure how the default container behaves when doing that # above code would build the constructor injection as it currently does, # defaulting to the class name in the right namespace as declared by the surrounding container # as well as adding using the catalyst-specific service class } } }; b) make component services depend on that, and c) ask for those services declared in a) outside of a web context simple as well. $customised_container->fetch('service')->get # or whatever the api was 19:23 < andrewalker> edenc, when explaining to me how it should be, drafted this: https://gist.github.com/1098186 19:26 < edenc> I like the possibility of being able to provide a backwards-compatible structure which we can muck around with by configuring B::B 19:26 <@rafl> so, the request context clearly isn't a service 19:27 <@rafl> but that's ok. there's parametrised services 19:27 < edenc> yeah, that was a draft 19:27 <@rafl> the outer Foo service is pretty much what i'd expect Service::WithAcceptContext to do, except with a dependency on a context instead of a service parameter 19:32 <@rafl> actually having services for the pre-ACCEPT_CONTEXT bits is what i want to think about ### To polish off - Document current methods - + $class->container->get_sub_container('model')->make_single_default; + $class->container->get_sub_container('view')->make_single_default; ### Known issues - Broken $instance->expand_modules() in setup_components and figure out later how to bring it back - expand_component_module