From: Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 21:11:44 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Some small wording tweaks for Construction manual
X-Git-Tag: 0.78~59
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=f293b3636803ab8e58208c262bfcaf3766a523a6;p=gitmo%2FMoose.git

Some small wording tweaks for Construction manual
---

diff --git a/lib/Moose/Manual/Construction.pod b/lib/Moose/Manual/Construction.pod
index de8d983..5baad74 100644
--- a/lib/Moose/Manual/Construction.pod
+++ b/lib/Moose/Manual/Construction.pod
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Moose::Manual::Construction - Object construction (and destruction) with Moose
 
 =head1 WHERE'S THE CONSTRUCTOR?
 
-B<You do not need to define a C<new()> method for your classes!>
+B<Do not define a C<new()> method for your classes!>
 
 When you C<use Moose> in your class, you will become a subclass of
 L<Moose::Object>, which provides a C<new> method for you. If you
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ normal order of method inheritance.
 
 The theory behind this is that C<BUILD> methods can only be used for
 increasing specialization of a class's constraints, so it makes sense
-to call the least specific first (also, this is how Perl 6 does it).
+to call the least specific C<BUILD> method first. Also, this is how
+Perl 6 does it.
 
 =head1 OBJECT DESTRUCTION