From: Tom Phoenix <rootbeer@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 17:59:20 +0000 (+1200)
Subject: More thoroughly test rand() and srand()
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ec761cee1a788166fe0b107d6dd9d34e116030fb;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git

More thoroughly test rand() and srand()
---

diff --git a/t/op/rand.t b/t/op/rand.t
index 6031f42..9e4d692 100755
--- a/t/op/rand.t
+++ b/t/op/rand.t
@@ -1,66 +1,345 @@
 #!./perl
 
-# From: kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Karl Glazebrook)
+# From Tom Phoenix <rootbeer@teleport.com> 22 Feb 1997
+# Based upon a test script by kgb@ast.cam.ac.uk (Karl Glazebrook)
 
-print "1..6\n";
+# Looking for the hints? You're in the right place. 
+# The hints are near each test, so search for "TEST #", where
+# the pound sign is replaced by the number of the test.
 
-srand;
+# I'd like to include some more robust tests, but anything
+# too subtle to be detected here would require a time-consuming
+# test. Also, of course, we're here to detect only flaws in Perl;
+# if there are flaws in the underlying system rand, that's not
+# our responsibility. But if you want better tests, see
+# The Art of Computer Programming, Donald E. Knuth, volume 2,
+# chapter 3. ISBN 0-201-03822-6 (v. 2)
 
-$m=$max=0; 
-for(1..1000){ 
-   $n = rand(1);
-   if ($n<0) {
-       print "not ok 1\n# The value of randbits is likely too low in config.sh\n";
-       exit
-   }
-   $m += $n;
-   $max = $n if $n > $max;
+BEGIN {
+    chdir "t" if -d "t";
+    @INC = "../lib" if -d "../lib";
 }
-$m=$m/1000;
-print "ok 1\n";
 
-$off = log($max)/log(2);
-if ($off > 0) { $off = int(.5+$off) }
-    else { $off = - int(.5-$off) }
-print "# Consider adding $off to randbits\n" if $off > 0;
-print "# Consider subtracting ", -$off, " from randbits\n" if $off < 0;
+use strict;
+use Config;
 
-if ($m<0.4) {
-    print "not ok 2\n# The value of randbits is likely too high in config.sh\n";
-}
-elsif ($m>0.6) {
-    print "not ok 2\n# The value of randbits is likely too low in config.sh\n";
-}else{
-    print "ok 2\n";
+print "1..11\n";
+
+srand;			# Shouldn't need this with 5.004...
+			# But I'll include it now and test for
+			# whether we needed it later.
+
+my $reps = 1000;	# How many times to try rand each time.
+			# May be changed, but should be over 500.
+			# The more the better! (But slower.)
+
+sub bits ($) {
+    # Takes a small integer and returns the number of one-bits in it.
+    my $total;
+    my $bits = sprintf "%o", $_[0];
+    while (length $bits) {
+	$total += (0,1,1,2,1,2,2,3)[chop $bits];	# Oct to bits
+    }
+    $total;
 }
 
-srand;
+# First, let's see whether randbits is set right
+{
+    my($max, $min, $sum);	# Characteristics of rand
+    my($off, $shouldbe);	# Problems with randbits
+    my($dev, $bits);		# Number of one bits
+    my $randbits = $Config{randbits};
+    $max = $min = rand(1);
+    for (1..$reps) {
+	my $n = rand(1);
+	$sum += $n;
+	$bits += bits($n * 256);	# Don't be greedy; 8 is enough
+		    # It's too many if randbits is less than 8!
+		    # But that should never be the case... I hope.
+		    # Note: If you change this, you must adapt the
+		    # formula for absolute standard deviation, below.
+	$max = $n if $n > $max;
+	$min = $n if $n < $min;
+    }
+
+
+    # Hints for TEST 1
+    #
+    # This test checks for one of Perl's most frequent
+    # mis-configurations. Your system's documentation
+    # for rand(2) should tell you what value you need
+    # for randbits. Usually the diagnostic message
+    # has the right value as well. Just fix it and
+    # recompile, and you'll usually be fine. (The main 
+    # reason that the diagnostic message might get the
+    # wrong value is that Config.pm is incorrect.)
+    #
+    if ($max <= 0) {	# Just in case...
+	print "not ok 1\n";
+	print "# This perl was compiled with randbits=$randbits\n";
+	print "# which is _way_ off. Or maybe your system rand is broken,\n";
+	print "# or your C compiler can't multiply, or maybe Martians\n";
+	print "# have taken over your computer. For starters, see about\n";
+	print "# trying a better value for randbits.\n";
+	# If that isn't the problem, we'll have
+	# to put d_martians into Config.pm 
+	print "# Skipping remaining tests until randbits is fixed.\n";
+	exit;
+    }
+
+    $off = log($max) / log(2);			# log2
+    $off = int($off) + ($off > 0);		# Next more positive int
+    if ($off) {
+	$shouldbe = $Config{randbits} + $off;
+	print "not ok 1\n";
+	print "# This perl was compiled with randbits=$randbits on $^O.\n";
+	print "# Consider using randbits=$shouldbe instead.\n";
+	# And skip the remaining tests; they would be pointless now.
+	print "# Skipping remaining tests until randbits is fixed.\n";
+	exit;
+    } else {
+	print "ok 1\n";
+    }
+
+    # Hints for TEST 2
+    #
+    # This should always be true: 0 <= rand(1) < 1
+    # If this test is failing, something is seriously wrong,
+    # either in perl or your system's rand function.
+    #
+    if ($min < 0 or $max >= 1) {	# Slightly redundant...
+	print "not ok 2\n";
+	print "# min too low\n" if $min < 0;
+	print "# max too high\n" if $max >= 1;
+    } else {
+	print "ok 2\n";
+    }
+
+    # Hints for TEST 3
+    #
+    # This is just a crude test. The average number produced
+    # by rand should be about one-half. But once in a while
+    # it will be relatively far away. Note: This test will
+    # occasionally fail on a perfectly good system!
+    # See the hints for test 4 to see why.
+    #
+    $sum /= $reps;
+    if ($sum < 0.4 or $sum > 0.6) {
+	print "not ok 3\n# Average random number is far from 0.5\n";
+    } else {
+	print "ok 3\n";
+    }
 
-$m=0; 
-for(1..1000){ 
-   $n = rand(100);
-   if ($n<0 || $n>=100) {
-       print "not ok 3\n";
-       exit
-   }
-   $m += $n;
+    # Hints for TEST 4
+    #
+    #   NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE
+    # This test will fail .1% of the time on a normal system.
+    #				also
+    # This test asks you to see these hints 100% of the time!
+    #   NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE
+    #
+    # There is probably no reason to be alarmed that
+    # something is wrong with your rand function. But,
+    # if you're curious or if you can't help being 
+    # alarmed, keep reading.
+    #
+    # This is a less-crude test than test 3. But it has
+    # the same basic flaw: Unusually distributed random
+    # values should occasionally appear in every good
+    # random number sequence. (If you flip a fair coin
+    # twenty times every day, you'll see it land all
+    # heads about one time in a million days, on the
+    # average. That might alarm you if you saw it happen
+    # on the first day!)
+    #
+    # So, if this test failed on you once, run it a dozen
+    # times. If it keeps failing, it's likely that your
+    # rand is bogus. If it keeps passing, it's likely
+    # that the one failure was bogus. If it's a mix,
+    # read on to see about how to interpret the tests.
+    #
+    # The number printed in square brackets is the
+    # standard deviation, a statistical measure
+    # of how unusual rand's behavior seemed. It should
+    # fall in these ranges with these *approximate*
+    # probabilities:
+    #
+    #		under 1		68.26% of the time
+    #		1-2		27.18% of the time
+    #		2-3		 4.30% of the time
+    #		over 3		 0.26% of the time
+    #
+    # If the numbers you see are not scattered approximately
+    # (not exactly!) like that table, check with your vendor
+    # to find out what's wrong with your rand. Or with this
+    # algorithm. :-)
+    #
+    # Calculating absoulute standard deviation for number of bits set
+    # (eight bits per rep)
+    $dev = abs ($bits - $reps * 4) / sqrt($reps * 2);
 
+    if ($dev < 1.96) {
+	print "ok 4\n";		# 95% of the time.
+	print "# Your rand seems fine. If this test failed\n";
+	print "# previously, you may want to run it again.\n";
+    } elsif ($dev < 2.575) {
+	print "ok 4\n# In here about 4% of the time. Hmmm...\n";
+	print "# This is ok, but suspicious. But it will happen\n";
+	print "# one time out of 25, more or less.\n";
+	print "# You should run this test again to be sure.\n";
+    } elsif ($dev < 3.3) {
+	print "ok 4\n# In this range about 1% of the time.\n";
+	print "# This is very suspicious. It will happen only\n";
+	print "# about one time out of 100, more or less.\n";
+	print "# You should run this test again to be sure.\n";
+    } elsif ($dev < 3.9) {
+	print "not ok 4\n# In this range very rarely.\n";
+	print "# This is VERY suspicious. It will happen only\n";
+	print "# about one time out of 1000, more or less.\n";
+	print "# You should run this test again to be sure.\n";
+    } else {
+	print "not ok 4\n# Seriously whacked.\n";
+	print "# This is VERY VERY suspicious.\n";
+	print "# Your rand seems to be bogus.\n";
+    }
+    print "#\n# If you are having random number troubles,\n";
+    print "# see the hints within the test script for more\n";
+    printf "# information on why this might fail. [ %.3f ]\n", $dev;
 }
-$m=$m/1000;
-print "ok 3\n";
 
-if ($m<40 || $m>60) {
-    print "not ok 4\n";
-}else{
-    print "ok 4\n";
+{
+    srand;		# These three lines are for test 7
+    my $time = time;	# It's just faster to do them here.
+    my $rand = rand;
+
+    # Hints for TEST 5
+    # 
+    # This test checks that the argument to srand actually 
+    # sets the seed for generating random numbers. 
+    #
+    srand(3.14159);
+    my $r = rand;
+    srand(3.14159);
+    if (rand != $r) {
+	print "not ok 5\n";
+	print "# srand is not consistent.\n";
+    } else {
+	print "ok 5\n";
+    }
+
+    # Hints for TEST 6
+    # 
+    # This test just checks that the previous one didn't 
+    # give us false confidence!
+    #
+    if (rand == $r) {
+	print "not ok 6\n";
+	print "# rand is now unchanging!\n";
+    } else {
+	print "ok 6\n";
+    }
+
+    # Hints for TEST 7
+    #
+    # This checks that srand without arguments gives
+    # different sequences each time. Note: You shouldn't
+    # be calling srand more than once unless you know
+    # what you're doing! But if this fails on your 
+    # system, run perlbug and let the developers know
+    # what other sources of randomness srand should
+    # tap into.
+    #
+    while ($time == time) { }	# Wait for new second, just in case.
+    srand;
+    if (rand == $rand) {
+	print "not ok 7\n";
+	print "# srand without args isn't varying.\n";
+    } else {
+	print "ok 7\n";
+    }
 }
 
-srand(3.14159);
-$r = rand;
-srand(3.14159);
-print "# srand is not consistent.\nnot " if rand != $r;
-print "ok 5\n";
+# Now, let's see whether rand accepts its argument
+{
+    my($max, $min);
+    $max = $min = rand(100);
+    for (1..$reps) {
+	my $n = rand(100);
+	$max = $n if $n > $max;
+	$min = $n if $n < $min;
+    }
+
+    # Hints for TEST 8
+    #
+    # This test checks to see that rand(100) really falls 
+    # within the range 0 - 100, and that the numbers produced
+    # have a reasonably-large range among them.
+    #
+    if ($min < 0 or $max >= 100 or ($max - $min) < 65) {
+	print "not ok 8\n";
+	print "# min too low\n" if $min < 0;
+	print "# max too high\n" if $max >= 100;
+	print "# range too narrow\n" if ($max - $min) < 65;
+    } else {
+	print "ok 8\n";
+    }
 
-print "# rand is unchanging!\nnot " if rand == $r;
-print "ok 6\n";
+    # Hints for TEST 9
+    #
+    # This test checks that rand without an argument
+    # is equivalent to rand(1).
+    #
+    $_ = 12345;		# Just for fun.
+    srand 12345;
+    my $r = rand;
+    srand 12345;
+    if (rand(1) == $r) {
+	print "ok 9\n";
+    } else {
+	print "not ok 9\n";
+	print "# rand without arguments isn't rand(1)!\n";
+    }
 
+    # Hints for TEST 10
+    #
+    # This checks that rand without an argument is not
+    # rand($_). (In case somebody got overzealous.)
+    # 
+    if ($r >= 1) {
+	print "not ok 10\n";
+	print "# rand without arguments isn't under 1!\n";
+    } else {
+	print "ok 10\n";
+    }
+}
+
+# Hints for TEST 11
+#
+# This test checks whether Perl called srand for you. This should
+# be the case in version 5.004 and later. Note: You must still
+# call srand if your code might ever be run on a pre-5.004 system!
+#
+AUTOSRAND:
+{
+    unless ($Config{d_fork}) {
+	# Skip this test. It's not likely to be system-specific, anyway.
+	print "ok 11\n# Skipping this test on this platform.\n";
+	last;
+    }
+
+    my($pid, $first);
+    for (1..5) {
+	$pid = open PERL, "./perl -e 'print rand'|";
+	die "Couldn't pipe from perl: $!" unless defined $pid;
+	if (defined $first) {
+	    if ($first ne <PERL>) {
+		print "ok 11\n";
+		last AUTOSRAND;
+	    }
+	} else {
+	    $first = <PERL>;
+	}
+	close PERL or die "perl returned error code $?";
+    }
+    print "not ok 11\n# srand isn't being autocalled.\n";
+}