From: brian d foy Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 20:41:05 +0000 (-0700) Subject: * FAQ sync X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d12d61cff231dfdae5d1887a5c3905cbc67f0168;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git * FAQ sync This is commit 37550b8f812e591bcd0dd869d61677dac5bda92c from the perlfaq repository at git@github.com:briandfoy/perlfaq.git --- diff --git a/pod/perlfaq1.pod b/pod/perlfaq1.pod index 288374b..16f5801 100644 --- a/pod/perlfaq1.pod +++ b/pod/perlfaq1.pod @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ about Perl. =head2 What is Perl? Perl is a high-level programming language with an eclectic heritage -written by Larry Wall and a cast of thousands. It derives from the +written by Larry Wall and a cast of thousands. It derives from the ubiquitous C programming language and to a lesser extent from sed, awk, the Unix shell, and at least a dozen other tools and languages. Perl's process, file, and text manipulation facilities make it @@ -19,39 +19,39 @@ utilities, software tools, system management tasks, database access, graphical programming, networking, and world wide web programming. These strengths make it especially popular with system administrators and CGI script authors, but mathematicians, geneticists, journalists, -and even managers also use Perl. Maybe you should, too. +and even managers also use Perl. Maybe you should, too. -=head2 Who supports Perl? Who develops it? Why is it free? +=head2 Who supports Perl? Who develops it? Why is it free? The original culture of the pre-populist Internet and the deeply-held beliefs of Perl's author, Larry Wall, gave rise to the free and open -distribution policy of perl. Perl is supported by its users. The +distribution policy of perl. Perl is supported by its users. The core, the standard Perl library, the optional modules, and the -documentation you're reading now were all written by volunteers. See +documentation you're reading now were all written by volunteers. See the personal note at the end of the README file in the perl source -distribution for more details. See L (new as of 5.005) +distribution for more details. See L (new as of 5.005) for Perl's milestone releases. In particular, the core development team (known as the Perl Porters) are a rag-tag band of highly altruistic individuals committed to producing better software for free than you could hope to purchase for -money. You may snoop on pending developments via the archives at +money. You may snoop on pending developments via the archives at http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/ and http://archive.develooper.com/perl5-porters@perl.org/ or the news gateway nntp://nntp.perl.org/perl.perl5.porters or its web interface at http://nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters , or read the faq at http://dev.perl.org/perl5/docs/p5p-faq.html , or you can subscribe to the mailing list by sending -perl5-porters-request@perl.org a subscription request +perl5-porters-subscribe@perl.org a subscription request (an empty message with no subject is fine). While the GNU project includes Perl in its distributions, there's no -such thing as "GNU Perl". Perl is not produced nor maintained by the -Free Software Foundation. Perl's licensing terms are also more open +such thing as "GNU Perl". Perl is not produced nor maintained by the +Free Software Foundation. Perl's licensing terms are also more open than GNU software's tend to be. You can get commercial support of Perl if you wish, although for most -users the informal support will more than suffice. See the answer to +users the informal support will more than suffice. See the answer to "Where can I buy a commercial version of perl?" for more information. =head2 Which version of Perl should I use? @@ -101,22 +101,22 @@ for a while, although not at the same level as the current releases. =item * -No one is actively supporting Perl 4. Five years ago it was a dead -camel carcass (according to this document). Now it's barely a skeleton +No one is actively supporting Perl 4. Five years ago it was a dead +camel carcass (according to this document). Now it's barely a skeleton as its whitewashed bones have fractured or eroded. =item * There is no Perl 6 release scheduled, but it will be available when -it's ready. Stay tuned, but don't worry that you'll have to change +it's ready. Stay tuned, but don't worry that you'll have to change major versions of Perl; no one is going to take Perl 5 away from you. =item * There are really two tracks of perl development: a maintenance version -and an experimental version. The maintenance versions are stable, and +and an experimental version. The maintenance versions are stable, and have an even number as the minor release (i.e. perl5.10.x, where 10 is the -minor release). The experimental versions may include features that +minor release). The experimental versions may include features that don't make it into the stable versions, and have an odd number as the minor release (i.e. perl5.9.x, where 9 is the minor release). @@ -131,21 +131,21 @@ In short, Perl 4 is the past, Perl 5 is the present, and Perl 6 is the future. The number after perl (i.e. the 5 after Perl 5) is the major release -of the perl interpreter as well as the version of the language. Each +of the perl interpreter as well as the version of the language. Each major version has significant differences that earlier versions cannot support. The current major release of Perl is Perl 5, and was released in 1994. It can run scripts from the previous major release, Perl 4 (March 1991), but has significant differences. It introduced the concept of references, -complex data structures, and modules. The Perl 5 interpreter was a +complex data structures, and modules. The Perl 5 interpreter was a complete re-write of the previous perl sources. Perl 6 is the next major version of Perl, but it's still in development -in both its syntax and design. The work started in 2002 and is still -ongoing. Many of the most interesting features have shown up in the +in both its syntax and design. The work started in 2002 and is still +ongoing. Many of the most interesting features have shown up in the latest versions of Perl 5, and some Perl 5 modules allow you to use some -Perl 6 syntax in your programs. You can learn more about Perl 6 at +Perl 6 syntax in your programs. You can learn more about Perl 6 at http://dev.perl.org/perl6/ . See L for a history of Perl revisions. @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Perl Foundation. It was abandoned in 2006 Instead of using the current Perl internals, Ponie aimed to create a new one that would provide a translation path from Perl 5 to Perl 6 (or anything else that targets Parrot, actually). You would have been -able to just keep using Perl 5 with Parrot, the virtual machine which +able to just keep using Perl 5 with Parrot, the virtual machine which will compile and run Perl 6 bytecode. =head2 What is Perl 6? @@ -187,51 +187,51 @@ you need to do. =head2 How stable is Perl? Production releases, which incorporate bug fixes and new functionality, -are widely tested before release. Since the 5.000 release, we have +are widely tested before release. Since the 5.000 release, we have averaged only about one production release per year. Larry and the Perl development team occasionally make changes to the internal core of the language, but all possible efforts are made toward -backward compatibility. While not quite all Perl 4 scripts run flawlessly +backward compatibility. While not quite all Perl 4 scripts run flawlessly under Perl 5, an update to perl should nearly never invalidate a program written for an earlier version of perl (barring accidental bug fixes and the rare new keyword). =head2 Is Perl difficult to learn? -No, Perl is easy to start learning--and easy to keep learning. It looks +No, Perl is easy to start learning--and easy to keep learning. It looks like most programming languages you're likely to have experience with, so if you've ever written a C program, an awk script, a shell script, or even a BASIC program, you're already partway there. -Most tasks only require a small subset of the Perl language. One of +Most tasks only require a small subset of the Perl language. One of the guiding mottos for Perl development is "there's more than one way -to do it" (TMTOWTDI, sometimes pronounced "tim toady"). Perl's +to do it" (TMTOWTDI, sometimes pronounced "tim toady"). Perl's learning curve is therefore shallow (easy to learn) and long (there's a whole lot you can do if you really want). Finally, because Perl is frequently (but not always, and certainly not by definition) an interpreted language, you can write your programs and test them without an intermediate compilation step, allowing you to experiment -and test/debug quickly and easily. This ease of experimentation flattens +and test/debug quickly and easily. This ease of experimentation flattens the learning curve even more. Things that make Perl easier to learn: Unix experience, almost any kind of programming experience, an understanding of regular expressions, and -the ability to understand other people's code. If there's something you +the ability to understand other people's code. If there's something you need to do, then it's probably already been done, and a working example is -usually available for free. Don't forget Perl modules, either. +usually available for free. Don't forget Perl modules, either. They're discussed in Part 3 of this FAQ, along with CPAN, which is discussed in Part 2. =head2 How does Perl compare with other languages like Java, Python, REXX, Scheme, or Tcl? -Favorably in some areas, unfavorably in others. Precisely which areas +Favorably in some areas, unfavorably in others. Precisely which areas are good and bad is often a personal choice, so asking this question on Usenet runs a strong risk of starting an unproductive Holy War. Probably the best thing to do is try to write equivalent code to do a -set of tasks. These languages have their own newsgroups in which you +set of tasks. These languages have their own newsgroups in which you can learn about (but hopefully not argue about) them. Some comparison documents can be found at http://www.perl.com/doc/FMTEYEWTK/versus/ @@ -243,21 +243,21 @@ Perl is flexible and extensible enough for you to use on virtually any task, from one-line file-processing tasks to large, elaborate systems. For many people, Perl serves as a great replacement for shell scripting. For others, it serves as a convenient, high-level replacement for most of -what they'd program in low-level languages like C or C++. It's ultimately +what they'd program in low-level languages like C or C++. It's ultimately up to you (and possibly your management) which tasks you'll use Perl for and which you won't. If you have a library that provides an API, you can make any component of it available as just another Perl function or variable using a Perl extension written in C or C++ and dynamically linked into your main -perl interpreter. You can also go the other direction, and write your +perl interpreter. You can also go the other direction, and write your main program in C or C++, and then link in some Perl code on the fly, -to create a powerful application. See L. +to create a powerful application. See L. That said, there will always be small, focused, special-purpose languages dedicated to a specific problem domain that are simply more -convenient for certain kinds of problems. Perl tries to be all things -to all people, but nothing special to anyone. Examples of specialized +convenient for certain kinds of problems. Perl tries to be all things +to all people, but nothing special to anyone. Examples of specialized languages that come to mind include prolog and matlab. =head2 When shouldn't I program in Perl? @@ -272,19 +272,19 @@ certain task (e.g. prolog, make). For various reasons, Perl is probably not well-suited for real-time embedded systems, low-level operating systems development work like device drivers or context-switching code, complex multi-threaded -shared-memory applications, or extremely large applications. You'll +shared-memory applications, or extremely large applications. You'll notice that perl is not itself written in Perl. Perl remains fundamentally a dynamically typed language, not -a statically typed one. You certainly won't be chastised if you don't -trust nuclear-plant or brain-surgery monitoring code to it. And Larry +a statically typed one. You certainly won't be chastised if you don't +trust nuclear-plant or brain-surgery monitoring code to it. And Larry will sleep easier, too--Wall Street programs not withstanding. :-) =head2 What's the difference between "perl" and "Perl"? -One bit. Oh, you weren't talking ASCII? :-) Larry now uses "Perl" to +One bit. Oh, you weren't talking ASCII? :-) Larry now uses "Perl" to signify the language proper and "perl" the implementation of it, i.e. -the current interpreter. Hence Tom's quip that "Nothing but perl can +the current interpreter. Hence Tom's quip that "Nothing but perl can parse Perl." Before the first edition of I, people commonly @@ -295,26 +295,26 @@ when typeset. This convention was adopted by the community, and the second edition became I, using the capitalized version of the name to refer to the language. -You may or may not choose to follow this usage. For example, +You may or may not choose to follow this usage. For example, parallelism means "awk and perl" and "Python and Perl" look good, while -"awk and Perl" and "Python and perl" do not. But never write "PERL", +"awk and Perl" and "Python and perl" do not. But never write "PERL", because perl is not an acronym, apocryphal folklore and post-facto expansions notwithstanding. =head2 Is it a Perl program or a Perl script? -Larry doesn't really care. He says (half in jest) that "a script is -what you give the actors. A program is what you give the audience." +Larry doesn't really care. He says (half in jest) that "a script is +what you give the actors. A program is what you give the audience." Originally, a script was a canned sequence of normally interactive -commands--that is, a chat script. Something like a UUCP or PPP chat +commands--that is, a chat script. Something like a UUCP or PPP chat script or an expect script fits the bill nicely, as do configuration scripts run by a program at its start up, such F<.cshrc> or F<.ircrc>, -for example. Chat scripts were just drivers for existing programs, +for example. Chat scripts were just drivers for existing programs, not stand-alone programs in their own right. A computer scientist will correctly explain that all programs are -interpreted and that the only question is at what level. But if you +interpreted and that the only question is at what level. But if you ask this question of someone who isn't a computer scientist, they might tell you that a I has been compiled to physical machine code once and can then be run multiple times, whereas a I