From: Bob Wilkinson Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:50:40 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [perl #17819] Typo in perltooc? X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c801bddb79887dcdaa40b9af734318a8be202252;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git [perl #17819] Typo in perltooc? From: Bob Wilkinson (via RT) Date: 9 Oct 2002 09:50:40 -0000 Message-Id: Subject: [perl #17821] Typo in perltooc From: Bob Wilkinson (via RT) Date: 9 Oct 2002 10:12:51 -0000 Message-Id: p4raw-id: //depot/perl@17995 --- diff --git a/pod/perltooc.pod b/pod/perltooc.pod index fdddb02..667f9fc 100644 --- a/pod/perltooc.pod +++ b/pod/perltooc.pod @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ The astonishing thing about the Cosmos class above is that the value returned by the &bigbang "constructor" is not a reference to a blessed object at all. It's just the class's own name. A class name is, for virtually all intents and purposes, a perfectly acceptable object. -It has state, behavior, and identify, the three crucial components +It has state, behavior, and identity, the three crucial components of an object system. It even manifests inheritance, polymorphism, and encapsulation. And what more can you ask of an object? @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ that happens to be named &spawn. print $obj3->color(); # prints "vermilion" Each of these objects' colors is now "vermilion", because that's the -meta-object's value that attribute, and these objects do not have +meta-object's value for that attribute, and these objects do not have individual color values set. Changing the attribute on one object has no effect on other objects