From: David Cantrell Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:26:56 +0000 (+0100) Subject: perltie.pod docpatch X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bebf870e6d027ca8a7a3da6a23b4612c5178aae4;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git perltie.pod docpatch Some years ago I submitted a docpatch for perltie to mention DBM::Deep alongside MLDBM. This updates that patch. The change is merely to remove the word "experimental" now that DBM::Deep is over five years old and is stable. $ diff -u ./pod/perltie.pod~ ./pod/perltie.pod Signed-off-by: Abigail --- diff --git a/pod/perltie.pod b/pod/perltie.pod index 9f26473..0323e32 100644 --- a/pod/perltie.pod +++ b/pod/perltie.pod @@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ tie methods for slice operations. You cannot easily tie a multilevel data structure (such as a hash of hashes) to a dbm file. The first problem is that all but GDBM and Berkeley DB have size limitations, but beyond that, you also have problems -with how references are to be represented on disk. One experimental +with how references are to be represented on disk. One module that does attempt to address this need is DBM::Deep. Check your nearest CPAN site as described in L for source code. Note that despite its name, DBM::Deep does not use dbm. Another earlier attempt