From: Michael Witten Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:46:00 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Docs: Fixed a couple of [my] typos X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9fd5bac037f142635de54421551d6c2d35ca66ed;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git Docs: Fixed a couple of [my] typos I read through each my patches again and came across a typo, a slight incorrectness, and a repeated word. Sorry. Signed-off-by: Michael Witten --- diff --git a/pod/perlboot.pod b/pod/perlboot.pod index 6cc5924..f4327a7 100644 --- a/pod/perlboot.pod +++ b/pod/perlboot.pod @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ reference (and thus an instance). It then constructs an argument list, as per usual. Now for the fun part: Perl takes the class in which the instance was -blessed, in this case C, and uses that calss to locate the +blessed, in this case C, and uses that class to locate the subroutine. In this case, C is found directly (without using inheritance). In the end, it is as though our initial line were written as follows: @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ Now with the new C method, we can build a horse as follows: Notice we're back to a class method, so the two arguments to C are C and C. The C operator -not only blesses C<$name>, it also returns that reference. +not only blesses C<\$name>, it also returns that reference. This C method is called a "constructor". @@ -749,8 +749,8 @@ C might still mess up, and we'd have to override all of those too. Therefore, it's never a good idea to define the data layout in a way that's different from the data layout of the base classes. In fact, it's a good idea to use blessed hash references in all cases. Also, this -is also why it's important to have constructors do the low-level work. -So, let's redefine C: +is why it's important to have constructors do the low-level work. So, +let's redefine C: ## in Animal sub name {