From: Tomas Doran Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:58:25 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Actually, remove this as I have covered it all. We later need to be able to warn... X-Git-Tag: 5.80001~78 X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8e4b5fe784b9ee5c07cb35e53007a612c46a00c5;p=catagits%2FCatalyst-Runtime.git Actually, remove this as I have covered it all. We later need to be able to warn about versions of things which are disrecommended, rather than being in total conflict, but thats trivial.. --- diff --git a/IDEAS b/IDEAS deleted file mode 100644 index e101406..0000000 --- a/IDEAS +++ /dev/null @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@ -* improve NEXT warnings. related irc conversation from 09/01/21: - -04:41:15 <@mst> actually, even better, it can pass an exclude list -04:41:22 <@mst> and an include list with versions that contain fixage -04:41:39 <@mst> then as shit on CPAN gets fixed it can start warning that you should upgrade -04:41:46 <@rafl> that's already implemented. someone would need to maintain that list though -04:42:28 <@rafl> i still think that silencing the warnings will delay fixes -04:42:33 <@mst> if one person files all the rt tickets -04:42:45 <@mst> it's just a question of watching email -04:44:04 <@mst> and it doesn't seem fair for a user's code to warn all over the fucking place -04:44:10 <@mst> just because some cpan author hasn't got their ass in gear -04:44:52 <@rafl> the user already can disable the warnings for certain classes -04:45:44 <@mst> I think we should leave 'em on for the RCs -04:45:57 * dhoss-laptop phrews -04:46:02 <@mst> but I don't think 5.80 final should be that sqeually -04:46:06 <@rafl> what we have now is basically what i thought was good enough. it can certainly be better. -04:46:17 <@rafl> i won't work on that anytime soon though -04:46:20 <@mst> sure -04:46:34 <@mst> could you throw this conversation into an IDEAS file or something?