From: Peter Rabbitson Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:27:38 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Make sure handling of exception_action is recursion-safe X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7704dbc93be76967fd8b051a3f6b1df32a2467a3;p=dbsrgits%2FDBIx-Class.git Make sure handling of exception_action is recursion-safe Pointed out by Lukas Mai in the last (fifth) bullet point of https://github.com/PerlDancer/Dancer2/issues/1125#issuecomment-180326756 In addition add extra testing making sure that we will not inadvertently silence $SIG{__DIE__} when the error is *not* transient Hopefully this is the last piece of the "clean transient exceptions" puzzle, it's already been way too much faffing: 7cb35852, ddcc02d1 and 5c33c8be :( --- diff --git a/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm b/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm index 7527ddf..f8179fb 100644 --- a/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm +++ b/lib/DBIx/Class/Schema.pm @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ This guard was activated beginning" ); }; - eval { + dbic_internal_try { # if it throws - good, we'll assign to @args in the end # if it doesn't - do different things depending on RV truthiness if( $act->(@args) ) { @@ -1109,14 +1109,13 @@ This guard was activated beginning" 1; } - - or - - # We call this to get the necessary warnings emitted and disregard the RV - # as it's definitely an exception if we got as far as this do{} block - is_exception( - $args[0] = $@ - ); + catch { + # We call this to get the necessary warnings emitted and disregard the RV + # as it's definitely an exception if we got as far as this catch{} block + is_exception( + $args[0] = $_ + ); + }; # Done guarding against https://github.com/PerlDancer/Dancer2/issues/1125 $guard_disarmed = 1; diff --git a/t/34exception_action.t b/t/34exception_action.t index d326bf7..aa803eb 100644 --- a/t/34exception_action.t +++ b/t/34exception_action.t @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ use warnings; use Test::More; use Test::Exception; use Test::Warn; +use Scalar::Util 'weaken'; use DBICTest; @@ -118,4 +119,19 @@ for my $ap (qw( } $exp_warn, 'Proper warning on encountered antipattern'; } +# ensure we do not get into an infloop +{ + weaken( my $s = $schema ); + + $schema->exception_action(sub{ + $s->throw_exception(@_) + }); + + throws_ok { + $schema->storage->dbh_do(sub { + $_[1]->do('wgwfwfwghawhjsejsethjwetjesjesjsejsetjes') + } ) + } qr/syntax error/i; +} + done_testing; diff --git a/t/storage/reconnect.t b/t/storage/reconnect.t index c19f44f..9c1c564 100644 --- a/t/storage/reconnect.t +++ b/t/storage/reconnect.t @@ -16,12 +16,22 @@ my $db_tmp = "$db_orig.tmp"; # Set up the "usual" sqlite for DBICTest my $schema = DBICTest->init_schema( sqlite_use_file => 1 ); -my $exception_action_count; -$schema->exception_action(sub { - $exception_action_count++; +my $exception_callback_count; +my $ea = $schema->exception_action(sub { + $exception_callback_count++; die @_; }); + +# No, this is not a great idea. +# Yes, people do it anyway. +# Might as well test that we have fixed it for good, by never invoking +# a potential __DIE__ handler in internal_try() stacks. In cases of regular +# exceptions we expect *both* the exception action *AND* the __DIE__ to +# fire once +$SIG{__DIE__} = sub { &$ea }; + + # Make sure we're connected by doing something my @art = $schema->resultset("Artist")->search({ }, { order_by => { -desc => 'name' }}); cmp_ok(@art, '==', 3, "Three artists returned"); @@ -98,7 +108,7 @@ for my $ctx (keys %$ctx_map) { # start disconnected and then connected $schema->storage->disconnect; - $exception_action_count = 0; + $exception_callback_count = 0; for (1, 2) { my $disarmed; @@ -115,7 +125,7 @@ for my $ctx (keys %$ctx_map) { }, @$args) }); } - is( $exception_action_count, 0, 'exception_action never called' ); + is( $exception_callback_count, 0, 'neither exception_action nor $SIG{__DIE__} ever called' ); }; # make sure RT#110429 does not recur on manual DBI-side disconnect @@ -149,7 +159,7 @@ for my $cref ( note( "Testing with " . B::Deparse->new->coderef2text($cref) ); $schema->storage->disconnect; - $exception_action_count = 0; + $exception_callback_count = 0; ok( !$schema->storage->connected, 'Not connected' ); @@ -164,13 +174,13 @@ for my $cref ( is( $schema->storage->transaction_depth, undef, "Depth expectedly unknown after failed rollbacks" ); - is( $exception_action_count, 1, "exception_action called only once" ); + is( $exception_callback_count, 2, 'exception_action and $SIG{__DIE__} called only once each' ); } # check exception_action under tenacious disconnect { $schema->storage->disconnect; - $exception_action_count = 0; + $exception_callback_count = 0; throws_ok { $schema->txn_do(sub { $schema->storage->_dbh->disconnect; @@ -178,7 +188,7 @@ for my $cref ( $schema->resultset('Artist')->next; })} qr/prepare on inactive database handle/; - is( $exception_action_count, 1, "exception_action called only once" ); + is( $exception_callback_count, 2, 'exception_action and $SIG{__DIE__} called only once each' ); } # check that things aren't crazy with a non-violent disconnect