From: Matt S Trout <mst@shadowcat.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 20:21:01 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Branch dead, left for informational purposes pending spec for replacement
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=689578fadba572dcdb9b32eb1780559f9663b399;p=dbsrgits%2FDBIx-Class-Historic.git

Branch dead, left for informational purposes pending spec for replacement
---

diff --git a/NO_MERGE_REASON b/NO_MERGE_REASON
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd4acef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/NO_MERGE_REASON
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+21:15 <@mst> Caelum: the parse_via branch is completely incoherent
+21:15 <@mst> Caelum: write up a specification that explains what you're trying 
+             to achieve
+21:15 <@mst> Caelum: and then we can discuss an implementation that'll be 
+             acceptable
+21:16 < Caelum> mst: it sems coherent enough to me, what specifically?
+21:17 < Caelum> I wrote this stuff like 2 years ago
+21:18 <@mst> well, it ain't merging; scaffolding calsses on the fly like that 
+             doesn't make any sense
+21:19 <@mst> having multiple Strptime objects, sure
+21:19 <@mst> having a single class that delegates to them, maybe
+21:19 <@mst> but "generating a datetime parser class" is not the job of a 
+             storage
+
+Branch dead, left for informational purposes pending Caelum writing a spec
+from which we can design a usable implementation.