From: Matt S Trout <mst@shadowcat.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:22:09 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: extract recheck setup logic into its own step
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=614f3d93fa2a59549c00c849354763a681b8a3e6;hp=389ebbbb0f839b81664c437dec34cf6e46d40fe8;p=scpubgit%2FDX.git

extract recheck setup logic into its own step
---

diff --git a/lib/DX/Step/EnterRecheck.pm b/lib/DX/Step/EnterRecheck.pm
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4b9d76e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/DX/Step/EnterRecheck.pm
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+package DX::Step::EnterRecheck;
+
+use DX::Class;
+
+with 'DX::Role::Step';
+
+has proposition_list => (is => 'ro', required => 1);
+
+sub apply_to {
+  my ($self, $old_ss) = @_;
+
+  my ($prop, @rest) = @{$self->proposition_list};
+
+  die "NOT YET DAMNIT" if @rest;
+
+  my $old_hyp = $old_ss->current_hypothesis;
+
+  # we should probably be doing something about pruning the scope
+  # but that's completely pointless until we have rules (and also,
+  # the lock_to_depth arg needs to come from the proposition somehow)
+
+  my $ap = DX::ActionPolicy::LockScope->new(
+    lock_to_depth => $old_hyp->scope->depth,
+    next_policy => $old_hyp->action_policy,
+  );
+
+  my $hyp = ref($old_hyp)->new(
+    scope => $old_hyp->scope,
+    resolved_propositions => DX::ResolvedPropositionSet->new_empty,
+    actions => [],
+    action_applications => [],
+    action_policy => $ap,
+  );
+
+  my $pseq = DX::PropositionSequence->new(
+    members => [ $prop ],
+    external_names => {},
+    internal_names => {},
+  );
+
+  trace 'step.recheck.hyp' => $hyp;
+
+  my $ss = DX::SearchState->new(
+    current_hypothesis => $hyp,
+    alternatives => [],
+    propositions => $pseq,
+    next_step => DX::Step::ConsiderProposition->new(
+                   proposition => $prop,
+                 ),
+    is_solution_state => 0,
+    on_exhaustion_step => undef,
+    on_solution_step => DX::Step::MarkAsSolution->new,
+  );
+
+  return $ss;
+}
+
+1;
diff --git a/lib/DX/Step/ResolveProposition.pm b/lib/DX/Step/ResolveProposition.pm
index 66a980d..900c182 100644
--- a/lib/DX/Step/ResolveProposition.pm
+++ b/lib/DX/Step/ResolveProposition.pm
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 package DX::Step::ResolveProposition;
 
+use DX::Step::EnterRecheck;
+
 use Types::Standard qw(ArrayRef);
 use DX::Utils qw(deparse);
+
 use DX::Class;
 
 with 'DX::Role::Step';
@@ -81,42 +84,10 @@ sub _recheck_for {
 sub _recheck_one {
   my ($self, $old_ss, $prop) = @_;
 
-  my $old_hyp = $old_ss->current_hypothesis;
-
-  my $ap = DX::ActionPolicy::LockScope->new(
-    lock_to_depth => $old_hyp->scope->depth,
-    next_policy => $old_hyp->action_policy,
-  );
-
-  # we should probably be doing something about pruning the scope
-  # but that's completely pointless until we have rules
-
-  my $hyp = ref($old_hyp)->new(
-    scope => $old_hyp->scope,
-    resolved_propositions => DX::ResolvedPropositionSet->new_empty,
-    actions => [],
-    action_applications => [],
-    action_policy => $ap,
-  );
-
-  my $pseq = DX::PropositionSequence->new(
-    members => [ $prop ],
-    external_names => {},
-    internal_names => {},
-  );
-
-  trace 'step.recheck.hyp' => $hyp;
-
-  my $ss = DX::SearchState->new(
-    current_hypothesis => $hyp,
-    alternatives => [],
-    propositions => $pseq,
-    next_step => DX::Step::ConsiderProposition->new(
-                   proposition => $prop,
-                 ),
-    is_solution_state => 0,
-    on_exhaustion_step => undef,
-    on_solution_step => DX::Step::MarkAsSolution->new,
+  my $ss = $old_ss->but(
+    next_step => DX::Step::EnterRecheck->new(
+      proposition_list => [ $prop ],
+    ),
   );
 
   my $sp = DX::SearchProcess->new(
@@ -132,6 +103,8 @@ sub _recheck_one {
 
   my $sol_rps = $sol_sp->current_hypothesis->resolved_propositions;
 
+  my $old_hyp = $old_ss->current_hypothesis;
+
   my $rps = $old_hyp->resolved_propositions;
 
   $rps = $rps->with_updated_dependencies_for(