From: Matt S Trout Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:47:23 +0000 (+0000) Subject: remove riba's whining about names since we're out of cheese to go with it X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=46f477f1cc11995b06c8400137b300f686bfa092;p=dbsrgits%2FDBIx-Class.git remove riba's whining about names since we're out of cheese to go with it --- diff --git a/TO_MERGE b/TO_MERGE index 269ee1b..0374e67 100644 --- a/TO_MERGE +++ b/TO_MERGE @@ -17,17 +17,3 @@ impossible to pass in an explicit negative. 7fc30cfd82 claims that I requested this - I was asking for a change from exists to undef (with the idea that passing an undef in would negate an inherited value, and reinvoke the default determination) - -* I am still firmly on the opinion that relationship_target_owns_me is an -extremely ugly name. If we want to be both descriptive and fall within a -sane coherent framework we need to rename the rest. Renaming doesn't mean the -old names are not supported, it simply means that the docs and examples are -updated, and that fallbacks for the old names are added in. - -owned_by|maybe_owned_by <==> owns_one|maybe_owns_one|owns_many (or perhaps - owns_some to indicate 0:M) - -Then the logical attr name would be owned_by_target - -I won't bikeshed the names anymore, if you elect to merge them this way I -reserve the right to laugh at you any time a confused soul complains yet again.