From: Mark-Jason Dominus <mjd@plover.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:22:06 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Re: DOC PATCH (5.005_54 perlsub.pod)
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4536e65df88825e8caa0a99c75b5c7283dc3c2ec;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git

Re: DOC PATCH (5.005_54 perlsub.pod)
Message-ID: <19990116222206.3674.qmail@plover.com>

p4raw-id: //depot/cfgperl@2785
---

diff --git a/pod/perlsub.pod b/pod/perlsub.pod
index 95fbb6b..6f9bb7fc 100644
--- a/pod/perlsub.pod
+++ b/pod/perlsub.pod
@@ -825,7 +825,8 @@ if you call it like a builtin function, then it behaves like a builtin
 function.  If you call it like an old-fashioned subroutine, then it
 behaves like an old-fashioned subroutine.  It naturally falls out from
 this rule that prototypes have no influence on subroutine references
-like C<\&foo> or on indirect subroutine calls like C<&{$subref}>.
+like C<\&foo> or on indirect subroutine calls like C<&{$subref}> or
+C<$subref-E<gt>()>. 
 
 Method calls are not influenced by prototypes either, because the
 function to be called is indeterminate at compile time, because it depends