From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:08:46 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Upgrade to Digest 1.08.
X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=371dcd31844db6c42075aa16ce0c192a5a23296e;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git

Upgrade to Digest 1.08.

p4raw-id: //depot/perl@22915
---

diff --git a/lib/Digest.pm b/lib/Digest.pm
index f9a3930..0cbc417 100644
--- a/lib/Digest.pm
+++ b/lib/Digest.pm
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ package Digest;
 use strict;
 use vars qw($VERSION %MMAP $AUTOLOAD);
 
-$VERSION = "1.06";
+$VERSION = "1.08";
 
 %MMAP = (
   "SHA-1"      => ["Digest::SHA1", ["Digest::SHA", 1], ["Digest::SHA2", 1]],
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@ $VERSION = "1.06";
   "SHA-512"    => [["Digest::SHA", 512], ["Digest::SHA2", 512]],
   "HMAC-MD5"   => "Digest::HMAC_MD5",
   "HMAC-SHA-1" => "Digest::HMAC_SHA1",
+  "CRC-16"     => [["Digest::CRC", type => "crc16"]],
+  "CRC-32"     => [["Digest::CRC", type => "crc32"]],
+  "CRC-CCITT"  => [["Digest::CRC", type => "crcccitt"]],
 );
 
 sub new
@@ -220,33 +223,38 @@ This table should give some indication on the relative speed of
 different algorithms.  It is sorted by throughput based on a benchmark
 done with of some implementations of this API:
 
- Algorithm	Size	Implementation			MB/s
-
- MD4		128	Digest::MD4 v1.1		24.9
- MD5		128	Digest::MD5 v2.30		18.7
- Haval-256	256	Digest::Haval256 v1.0.4		17.0
- SHA-1		160	Digest::SHA1 v2.06		15.3
- SHA-1		160	Digest::SHA v4.0.0		10.1
- SHA-256	256	Digest::SHA2 v1.0.0	 	 7.6
- SHA-256	256	Digest::SHA v4.0.0	 	 6.5
- SHA-384	384	Digest::SHA2 v1.0.0	 	 2.7
- SHA-384	384	Digest::SHA v4.0.0	 	 2.7
- SHA-512	512	Digest::SHA2 v1.0.0		 2.7
- SHA-512	512	Digest::SHA v4.0.0		 2.7
- Whirlpool	512	Digest::Whirlpool v1.0.2	 1.4
- MD2		128	Digest::MD2 v2.03		 1.1
-
- Adler-32	 32	Digest::Adler32 v0.03	 	 0.2
- MD5		128	Digest::Perl::MD5 v1.5		 0.1
-
-These numbers was achieved Nov 2003 with ActivePerl-5.8.1 running
-under Linux on a P-II 350 MHz CPU.  The last 2 entries differ by being
+ Algorithm      Size    Implementation                  MB/s
+
+ MD4            128     Digest::MD4 v1.3               165.0
+ MD5            128     Digest::MD5 v2.33               98.8
+ SHA-256        256     Digest::SHA2 v1.1.0             66.7
+ SHA-1          160     Digest::SHA v4.3.1              58.9
+ SHA-1          160     Digest::SHA1 v2.10              48.8
+ SHA-256        256     Digest::SHA v4.3.1              41.3
+ Haval-256      256     Digest::Haval256 v1.0.4         39.8
+ SHA-384        384     Digest::SHA2 v1.1.0             19.6
+ SHA-512        512     Digest::SHA2 v1.1.0             19.3
+ SHA-384        384     Digest::SHA v4.3.1              19.2
+ SHA-512        512     Digest::SHA v4.3.1              19.2
+ Whirlpool      512     Digest::Whirlpool v1.0.2        13.0
+ MD2            128     Digest::MD2 v2.03                9.5
+
+ Adler-32        32     Digest::Adler32 v0.03            1.3
+ CRC-16          16     Digest::CRC v0.05                1.1
+ CRC-32          32     Digest::CRC v0.05                1.1
+ MD5            128     Digest::Perl::MD5 v1.5           1.0
+ CRC-CCITT       16     Digest::CRC v0.05                0.8
+
+These numbers was achieved Apr 2004 with ActivePerl-5.8.3 running
+under Linux on a P4 2.8 GHz CPU.  The last 5 entries differ by being
 pure perl implementations of the algorithms, which explains why they
 are so slow.
 
 =head1 SEE ALSO
 
-L<Digest::Adler32>, L<Digest::Haval256>, L<Digest::HMAC>, L<Digest::MD2>, L<Digest::MD4>, L<Digest::MD5>, L<Digest::SHA>, L<Digest::SHA1>, L<Digest::SHA2>, L<Digest::Whirlpool>
+L<Digest::Adler32>, L<Digest::CRC>, L<Digest::Haval256>,
+L<Digest::HMAC>, L<Digest::MD2>, L<Digest::MD4>, L<Digest::MD5>,
+L<Digest::SHA>, L<Digest::SHA1>, L<Digest::SHA2>, L<Digest::Whirlpool>
 
 New digest implementations should consider subclassing from L<Digest::base>.