Perl4-to-Perl5 traps involving precedence order.
+Perl 4 has almost the same precedence rules as Perl 5 for the operators
+that they both have. Perl 4 however, seems to have had some
+inconsistencies that made the behavior differ from what was documented.
+
=over 5
=item * Precedence
=item * Precedence
-concatenation precedence over filetest operator?
+perl4 had buggy precedence for the file test operators vis-a-vis
+the assignment operators. Thus, although the precedence table
+for perl4 leads one to believe C<-e $foo .= "q"> should parse as
+C<((-e $foo) .= "q")>, it actually parses as C<(-e ($foo .= "q"))>.
+In perl5, the precedence is as documented.
-e $foo .= "q"
# perl4 prints: no output
# perl5 prints: Can't modify -e in concatenation
+=item * Precedence
+
+In perl4, keys(), each() and values() were special high-precedence operators
+that operated on a single hash, but in perl5, they are regular named unary
+operators. As documented, named unary operators have lower precedence
+than the arithmetic and concatenation operators C<+ - .>, but the perl4
+variants of these operators actually bind tighter than C<+ - .>.
+Thus, for:
+
+ %foo = 1..10;
+ print keys %foo - 1
+
+ # perl4 prints: 4
+ # perl5 prints: Type of arg 1 to keys must be hash (not subtraction)
+
+The perl4 behavior was probably more useful, if less consistent.
+
=back
=head2 General Regular Expression Traps using s///, etc.