Overeager visited-positions optimizations
Ilya Zakharevich [Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:30:52 +0000 (13:30 -0500)]
Message-ID: <20001120183051.A15228@monk.mps.ohio-state.edu>

p4raw-id: //depot/perl@7815

pod/perlre.pod
regcomp.c
t/op/re_tests

index 8a85241..182f5bd 100644 (file)
@@ -910,10 +910,14 @@ ways they can use backtracking to try match.  For example, without
 internal optimizations done by the regular expression engine, this will
 take a painfully long time to run:
 
-    'aaaaaaaaaaaa' =~ /((a{0,5}){0,5}){0,5}[c]/
-
-And if you used C<*>'s instead of limiting it to 0 through 5 matches,
-then it would take forever--or until you ran out of stack space.
+    'aaaaaaaaaaaa' =~ /((a{0,5}){0,5})*[c]/
+
+And if you used C<*>'s in the internal groups instead of limiting them
+to 0 through 5 matches, then it would take forever--or until you ran
+out of stack space.  Moreover, these internal optimizations are not
+always applicable.  For example, if you put C<{0,5}> instead of C<*>
+on the external group, no current optimization is applicable, and the
+match takes a long time to finish.
 
 A powerful tool for optimizing such beasts is what is known as an
 "independent group",
index 82fb3c1..3b474b2 100644 (file)
--- a/regcomp.c
+++ b/regcomp.c
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static scan_data_t zero_scan_data = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
 #define SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND     0x0800
 #define SCF_DO_STCLASS_OR      0x1000
 #define SCF_DO_STCLASS         (SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND|SCF_DO_STCLASS_OR)
+#define SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS 0x2000
 
 #define RF_utf8                8
 #define UTF (PL_reg_flags & RF_utf8)
@@ -723,6 +724,8 @@ S_study_chunk(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, regnode **scanp, I32 *deltap, reg
                        data_fake.start_class = &this_class;
                        f = SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND;
                    }               
+                   if (flags & SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS)
+                       f |= SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS;
                    /* we suppose the run is continuous, last=next...*/
                    minnext = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &scan, &deltanext,
                                          next, &data_fake, f);
@@ -953,6 +956,14 @@ S_study_chunk(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, regnode **scanp, I32 *deltap, reg
                    f |= SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND;
                    f &= ~SCF_DO_STCLASS_OR;
                }
+               /* These are the cases when once a subexpression
+                  fails at a particular position, it cannot succeed
+                  even after backtracking at the enclosing scope.
+                  
+                  XXXX what if minimal match and we are at the
+                       initial run of {n,m}? */
+               if ((mincount != maxcount - 1) && (maxcount != REG_INFTY))
+                   f &= ~SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS;
 
                /* This will finish on WHILEM, setting scan, or on NULL: */
                minnext = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &scan, &deltanext, last, data, 
@@ -1083,13 +1094,20 @@ S_study_chunk(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, regnode **scanp, I32 *deltap, reg
                        }
 #endif
                        /* Optimize again: */
-                       study_chunk(pRExC_state, &nxt1, &deltanext, nxt, NULL, 0);
+                       study_chunk(pRExC_state, &nxt1, &deltanext, nxt, 
+                                   NULL, 0);
                    }
                    else
                        oscan->flags = 0;
                }
-               else if (OP(oscan) == CURLYX && data && ++data->whilem_c < 16) {
-                   /* This stays as CURLYX, and can put the count/of pair. */
+               else if ((OP(oscan) == CURLYX)
+                        && (flags & SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS)
+                        /* See the comment on a similar expression above.
+                           However, this time it not a subexpression
+                           we care about, but the expression itself. */
+                        && (maxcount == REG_INFTY)
+                        && data && ++data->whilem_c < 16) {
+                   /* This stays as CURLYX, we can put the count/of pair. */
                    /* Find WHILEM (as in regexec.c) */
                    regnode *nxt = oscan + NEXT_OFF(oscan);
 
@@ -1419,8 +1437,10 @@ S_study_chunk(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, regnode **scanp, I32 *deltap, reg
                 && OP(scan) == IFMATCH ) { /* Lookahead */
                cl_init(pRExC_state, &intrnl);
                data_fake.start_class = &intrnl;
-               f = SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND;
+               f |= SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND;
            }
+           if (flags & SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS)
+               f |= SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS;
            next = regnext(scan);
            nscan = NEXTOPER(NEXTOPER(scan));
            minnext = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &nscan, &deltanext, last, &data_fake, f);
@@ -1439,7 +1459,7 @@ S_study_chunk(pTHX_ RExC_state_t *pRExC_state, regnode **scanp, I32 *deltap, reg
                data->flags |= SF_HAS_EVAL;
            if (data)
                data->whilem_c = data_fake.whilem_c;
-           if (f) {
+           if (f & SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND) {
                int was = (data->start_class->flags & ANYOF_EOS);
 
                cl_and(data->start_class, &intrnl);
@@ -1779,7 +1799,7 @@ Perl_pregcomp(pTHX_ char *exp, char *xend, PMOP *pm)
        data.last_closep = &last_close;
 
        minlen = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &first, &fake, scan + RExC_size, /* Up to end */
-                            &data, SCF_DO_SUBSTR | stclass_flag);
+                            &data, SCF_DO_SUBSTR | SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS | stclass_flag);
        if ( RExC_npar == 1 && data.longest == &(data.longest_fixed)
             && data.last_start_min == 0 && data.last_end > 0 
             && !RExC_seen_zerolen
@@ -1888,7 +1908,7 @@ Perl_pregcomp(pTHX_ char *exp, char *xend, PMOP *pm)
        cl_init(pRExC_state, &ch_class);
        data.start_class = &ch_class;
        data.last_closep = &last_close;
-       minlen = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &scan, &fake, scan + RExC_size, &data, SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND);
+       minlen = study_chunk(pRExC_state, &scan, &fake, scan + RExC_size, &data, SCF_DO_STCLASS_AND|SCF_WHILEM_VISITED_POS);
        r->check_substr = r->anchored_substr = r->float_substr = Nullsv;
        if (!(data.start_class->flags & ANYOF_EOS)
            && !cl_is_anything(data.start_class)) {
index 102157c..8aa6933 100644 (file)
@@ -779,3 +779,5 @@ tt+$        xxxtt   y       -       -
 ^(a\1?){4}$    aaaaaa  y       $1      aa
 ^(0+)?(?:x(1))?        x1      y       -       -
 ^([0-9a-fA-F]+)(?:x([0-9a-fA-F]+)?)(?:x([0-9a-fA-F]+))?        012cxx0190      y       -       -
+^(b+?|a){1,2}c bbbac   y       $1      a
+^(b+?|a){1,2}c bbbbac  y       $1      a