Subject: Re: OFFSETOF
Chip Salzenberg writes:
>
> According to Ilya Zakharevich:
> > OFFSETOF conflicts with system headers under OS/2. Can the name be
> > changed slightly?
>
> Okay; or, would it be okay to "#undef OFFSETOF" and redefine it?
In this case the extensions would not be able to access "old-format"
16-bit functions. Not that I know any extension which tries to do
this...
What is bad with PERL_OFFSET?
p5p-msgid: <
199612202353.SAA05539@monk.mps.ohio-state.edu>
private-msgid: <
199612202325.SAA05505@monk.mps.ohio-state.edu>
:
elif try=`./loc lib$thislib$lib_ext X $libpth`; $test -f "$try"; then
:
+ elif try=`./loc $thislib$lib_ext X $libpth`; $test -f "$try"; then
+ :
elif try=`./loc lib$thislib X $libpth`; $test -f "$try"; then
:
elif try=`./loc $thislib X $libpth`; $test -f "$try"; then
printf("int\n");
else
printf("long\n");
+ fflush(stdout);
exit(0);
}
EOM