--- /dev/null
+
+=pod
+
+=head1 NAME
+
+Moose::Cookbook::Recipe9 - Builder methods and lazy_build
+
+=head1 SYNOPSIS
+
+ package BinaryTree;
+ use Moose;
+
+ has 'node' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Any');
+
+ has 'parent' => (
+ is => 'rw',
+ isa => 'BinaryTree',
+ predicate => 'has_parent',
+ weak_ref => 1,
+ );
+
+ has 'left' => (
+ is => 'rw',
+ isa => 'BinaryTree',
+ predicate => 'has_left',
+ lazy => 1,
+ builder => '_build_child_tree',
+ );
+
+ has 'right' => (
+ is => 'rw',
+ isa => 'BinaryTree',
+ predicate => 'has_right',
+ lazy => 1,
+ builder => '_build_child_tree',
+ );
+
+ before 'right', 'left' => sub {
+ my ($self, $tree) = @_;
+ $tree->parent($self) if defined $tree;
+ };
+
+ sub _build_child_tree {
+ my $self = shift;
+
+ return BinaryTree->new( parent => $self );
+ }
+
+=head1 DESCRIPTION
+
+If you've already read L<Moose::Cookbook::Recipe3>, then this example
+should look awfully familiar. In fact, all we've done here is replace
+the attribute C<default> with a C<builder> method.
+
+In this particular case, the C<default> and C<builder> act exactly the
+same. When the C<left> or C<right> attribute is first accessed before
+it has been set, Moose will call the specified C<builder> method to
+populate the attribute.
+
+=head2 Subclassable
+
+There are some differences between C<default> and C<builder>. Because
+C<builder> is called I<by name>, it goes through Perl's normal
+inheritance system. This means that builder methods are both
+inheritable and overrideable.
+
+For example, we might make a C<BinaryTree> subclass:
+
+ package TrinaryTree;
+ use Moose;
+
+ extends 'BinaryTree';
+
+ has 'middle' => (
+ is => 'rw',
+ isa => 'BinaryTree',
+ predicate => 'has_middle',
+ lazy => 1,
+ builder => '_build_child_tree',
+ );
+
+This doesn't quite work though. If you look closely at the
+C<_build_child_tree> method defined in C<BinaryTree>, you'll notice
+that it hard-codes a class name. Naughty us!
+
+Also, as a bonus, we'll pass C<@_> through, so subclasses can override
+the method to pass additional options to the constructor.
+
+Good object-oriented code should allow itself to be subclassed
+gracefully. Let's tweak C<_build_child_tree>:
+
+ sub _build_child_tree
+ my $self = shift;
+
+ return (ref $self)->new( parent => $self, @_ );
+ }
+
+Now C<_build_child_tree> can be gracefully inherited and overridden.
+
+=head2 Composable
+
+There's more to builders than just subclassing, though. The fact that
+builders are called by name also makes them suitable for use in a
+role.
+
+ package HasAnimal;
+ use Moose::Role;
+
+ requires '_build_animal';
+
+ has 'animal' => (
+ is => 'ro',
+ isa => 'Animal',
+ lazy => 1,
+ builder => '_build_animal',
+ );
+
+This role provides an animal attribute, but requires that the consumer
+of the role provide a builder method it.
+
+ package CatLover;
+ use Moose;
+
+ with 'HasAnimal';
+
+ sub _build_animal {
+ return Cat->new();
+ }
+
+This simply could not be done using a C<default>.
+
+=head2 The lazy_build shortcut
+
+The C<lazy_build> attribute parameter can be used as sugar to specify
+a whole bunch of options at once.
+
+ has 'animal' => (
+ is => 'ro',
+ isa => 'Animal',
+ lazy_build => 1,
+ );
+
+This is a shorthand for this:
+
+ has 'animal' => (
+ is => 'ro',
+ isa => 'Animal',
+ required => 1,
+ lazy => 1,
+ builder => '_build_animal',
+ predicate => 'has_animal',
+ clearer => 'clear_animal',
+ );
+
+If your attribute starts with an underscore, Moose is smart and will
+do the right thing with the C<predicate> and C<clearer>, making them
+both start with an underscore. The C<builder> method I<always> starts
+with an underscore, since you will want this to be private the vast
+majority of the time.
+
+=head1 CONCLUSION
+
+The C<builder> option is a more OO-friendly version of the C<default>
+functionality. It also has the property of separating out the code
+into a separate well-defined method. This alone makes it valuable. It
+is quite ugly to jam a long default code reference into your attribute
+definition.
+
+Here are some good rules for determining when to use C<builder> vs
+C<default>.
+
+If the default value is a simple scalar that only needs to be
+calculated once (or a constant), use C<default>.
+
+If the default value is an empty reference that needs to be wrapped in
+a coderef like C<sub { [] }>, use C<default>.
+
+Otherwise, use C<builder>.
+
+=head1 AUTHOR
+
+Dave Rolsky E<lt>autarch@urth.orgE<gt>
+
+=head1 COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
+
+Copyright 2006-2008 by Infinity Interactive, Inc.
+
+L<http://www.iinteractive.com>
+
+This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+it under the same terms as Perl itself.
+
+=cut