-use Test::More tests=>15; {
+use Test::More tests=>22; {
use strict;
use warnings;
use MooseX::Types -declare => [qw(
IntGreaterThanInt
UniqueInt
+ UniqueInt2
)];
+
+ ## sugar for alternative syntax: depending {} TC,TC
+ sub depending(&$$) {
+ my ($coderef, $dependent_tc, $constraining_tc) = @_;
+ return Depending[$dependent_tc,$coderef,$constraining_tc];
+ }
## The dependent value must exceed the constraining value
subtype IntGreaterThanInt,
ok !UniqueInt->check([1,[1,2,3]]), 'not unique in set';
ok !UniqueInt->check([10,[1,10,15]]), 'not unique in set';
ok UniqueInt->check([2,[3..6]]), 'PASS unique in set';
- ok UniqueInt->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+ ok UniqueInt->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+
+ ## Same as above, with suger
+ subtype UniqueInt2,
+ as depending {
+ my ($dependent_int, $constraining_arrayref) = @_;
+ ## Yes, this is braindead way to check for uniques in an array
+ ## but this doesn't require additional dependencies.
+ (grep { $_ == $dependent_int} @$constraining_arrayref) ? 0:1
+ } Int, ArrayRef[Int];
+
+ isa_ok UniqueInt2, 'MooseX::Meta::TypeConstraint::Dependent';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check(['a',[1,2,3]]), '"a" not an Int';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([1,['b','c']]), '"b","c" not an arrayref';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([1,[1,2,3]]), 'not unique in set';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([10,[1,10,15]]), 'not unique in set';
+ ok UniqueInt2->check([2,[3..6]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+ ok UniqueInt2->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
}