-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- BUGS
+BUGS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-TODO
+FEATURES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- DDuncan's Str types
=> where { !Encode::is_utf8( $_[0] ) }
=> optimize_as { defined($_[0]) && !ref($_[0]) };
-
-- should handle some moose-specific options in &Moose::Meta::Class::create
- things like roles, and method modifiers (although those can probably be
- ignored if i want to)
-
- type unions
Add support for doing it with Classes which do not have
(... probably be a custom metaclass)
-- subtype $anon_subtype => where { ... }
-
-[22:56] stevan sub mst_doesnt_like_to_type { (shift)->meta->attr->type_contstraint }
-[22:57] mst err
-[22:57] stevan :P
-[22:57] stevan are you wanting to reuse it or something?
-[22:57] stevan my $subtype = subtype 'Something' => where { ... };
-[22:58] stevan then you can do isa => $subtype
-[22:58] mst but I can't subtype it again
-[22:59] stevan mst: ahhh...
-[22:59] mst well, I can. but it suddenly gets very "long way round" ish
-[23:00] stevan my $constraint = Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint->new(
-[23:00] stevan name => $name || '__ANON__',
-[23:00] stevan parent => $parent,
-[23:00] stevan constraint => $check,
-[23:00] stevan message => $message,
-[23:00] stevan );
-[23:00] stevan yeah thats kinda the long way
-[23:00] stevan mst: what would you like it to be?
-[23:00] mst $parent = find_type_constraint($parent) if defined $parent;
-[23:00] mst if $parent is already a type constraint
-[23:00] mst skip that bit
-[23:00] stevan hmm
-[23:00] mst should be all you need to change
-[23:00] stevan yeah
-[23:01] stevan so you can then say
-[23:01] stevan subtype $anon => where { ... };
-[23:01] mst right
-[23:01] stevan ok
-
- local coerce
[13:16] mst stevan: slight problem with coerce
[13:32] mst etc.
[13:53] stevan hmm
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+INTERNALS
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+- rationalize all the get_X methods for classes (and roles)
+
+We have get_attribute, get_attributes_list, get_all_attributes,
+etc. First, we need to make the method names consistent. If something
+returns an attribute vs a name, that needs to be clear from the method
+name. We also need to make sure that local vs. "entire inheritance
+chain" is clear from the name.
+
+Finally, kill all the public get_X_map methods. The hashref it returns
+is the internal reference, and the fact that it _is_ a hashref is just
+an implementation detail.
+
+This is mostly a CMOP change.
+
+- Metaclass constructors
+
+There's a _lot_ of different conventions in here. Some things to consider:
+
+* new vs _new
+* allowing new( 'name', %args ) vs ( name => 'name', %args )
+* Method->wrap vs Method->new
+
+- Role & Class
+
+These two share a _lot_ of logic, but it's not via shared code. Maybe
+implement some sort of role-lit internal thing so we can have a
+"HasAttributes" and "HasMethods" role for classes and roles.
+
+- Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint::Parameter{izable,ized}
+
+The relationship between these two classes is very odd. In particular,
+this line in Parameterized is insane:
+
+ foreach my $type (Moose::Util::TypeConstraints::get_all_parameterizable_types()) {
+
+Why does it need to loop through all parameterizable types? Shouldn't
+it know which parameterizable type it "came from"?
+
+- Moose::Util::TypeConstraints vs Moose::Meta::Type{Coercion,Constraint}
+
+The Util module has _way_ too much functionality. It needs to be
+refactored so it's a thin sugar layer on top of the meta API. As it
+stands now, it does things like parse type names (and determine if
+they're valid), manage the registry, and much more.
+
+- Moose::Meta::Role::Application::*
+
+These class names are hardcoded throughout Moose, making replacing
+them very difficult.
+
+- Moose::Meta::Role & attributes
+
+The way a role stores attributes is nasty and not very
+introspectable. It should store some sort of object, possibly one that
+knows how to turn itself into a "real" attribute.
+
+- Anything with a _(meta)?class method
+
+Every method that returns a class name needs to become a rw attribute
+that can be set via the constructor.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO PONDER