--- /dev/null
+package Test::Simple;
+
+require 5.004;
+
+$Test::Simple::VERSION = '0.08';
+
+my(@Test_Results) = ();
+my($Num_Tests, $Planned_Tests, $Test_Died) = (0,0,0);
+my($Have_Plan) = 0;
+
+
+# Special print function to guard against $\ and -l munging.
+sub _print (*@) {
+ my($fh, @args) = @_;
+
+ local $\;
+ print $fh @args;
+}
+
+sub print { die "DON'T USE PRINT! Use _print instead" }
+
+
+# I'd like to have Test::Simple interfere with the program being
+# tested as little as possible. This includes using Exporter or
+# anything else (including strict).
+sub import {
+ # preserve caller()
+ if( @_ > 1 ) {
+ if( $_[1] eq 'no_plan' ) {
+ goto &no_plan;
+ }
+ else {
+ goto &plan
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+sub plan {
+ my($class, %config) = @_;
+
+ if( !exists $config{tests} ) {
+ die "You have to tell $class how many tests you plan to run.\n".
+ " use $class tests => 42; for example.\n";
+ }
+ elsif( !defined $config{tests} ) {
+ die "Got an undefined number of tests. Looks like you tried to tell ".
+ "$class how many tests you plan to run but made a mistake.\n";
+ }
+ elsif( !$config{tests} ) {
+ die "You told $class you plan to run 0 tests! You've got to run ".
+ "something.\n";
+ }
+ else {
+ $Planned_Tests = $config{tests};
+ }
+
+ $Have_Plan = 1;
+
+ _print *TESTOUT, "1..$Planned_Tests\n";
+
+ my($caller) = caller;
+ *{$caller.'::ok'} = \&ok;
+
+}
+
+
+sub no_plan {
+ $Have_Plan = 1;
+
+ my($caller) = caller;
+ *{$caller.'::ok'} = \&ok;
+}
+
+
+
+$| = 1;
+open(*TESTOUT, ">&STDOUT") or _whoa(1, "Can't dup STDOUT!");
+open(*TESTERR, ">&STDERR") or _whoa(1, "Can't dup STDERR!");
+{
+ my $orig_fh = select TESTOUT;
+ $| = 1;
+ select TESTERR;
+ $| = 1;
+ select $orig_fh;
+}
+
+=head1 NAME
+
+Test::Simple - Basic utilities for writing tests.
+
+=head1 SYNOPSIS
+
+ use Test::Simple tests => 1;
+
+ ok( $foo eq $bar, 'foo is bar' );
+
+
+=head1 DESCRIPTION
+
+This is an extremely simple, extremely basic module for writing tests
+suitable for CPAN modules and other pursuits.
+
+The basic unit of Perl testing is the ok. For each thing you want to
+test your program will print out an "ok" or "not ok" to indicate pass
+or fail. You do this with the ok() function (see below).
+
+The only other constraint is you must predeclare how many tests you
+plan to run. This is in case something goes horribly wrong during the
+test and your test program aborts, or skips a test or whatever. You
+do this like so:
+
+ use Test::Simple tests => 23;
+
+You must have a plan.
+
+
+=over 4
+
+=item B<ok>
+
+ ok( $foo eq $bar, $name );
+ ok( $foo eq $bar );
+
+ok() is given an expression (in this case C<$foo eq $bar>). If its
+true, the test passed. If its false, it didn't. That's about it.
+
+ok() prints out either "ok" or "not ok" along with a test number (it
+keeps track of that for you).
+
+ # This produces "ok 1 - Hell not yet frozen over" (or not ok)
+ ok( get_temperature($hell) > 0, 'Hell not yet frozen over' );
+
+If you provide a $name, that will be printed along with the "ok/not
+ok" to make it easier to find your test when if fails (just search for
+the name). It also makes it easier for the next guy to understand
+what your test is for. Its highly recommended you use test names.
+
+All tests are run in scalar context. So this:
+
+ ok( @stuff, 'I have some stuff' );
+
+will do what you mean (fail if stuff is empty).
+
+=cut
+
+sub ok ($;$) {
+ my($test, $name) = @_;
+
+ unless( $Have_Plan ) {
+ die "You tried to use ok() without a plan! Gotta have a plan.\n".
+ " use Test::Simple tests => 23; for example.\n";
+ }
+
+ $Num_Tests++;
+
+ # Make sure the print doesn't get interfered with.
+ local($\, $,);
+
+ _print *TESTERR, <<ERR if defined $name and $name !~ /\D/;
+You named your test '$name'. You shouldn't use numbers for your test names.
+Very confusing.
+ERR
+
+
+ # We must print this all in one shot or else it will break on VMS
+ my $msg;
+ unless( $test ) {
+ $msg .= "not ";
+ $Test_Results[$Num_Tests-1] = 0;
+ }
+ else {
+ $Test_Results[$Num_Tests-1] = 1;
+ }
+ $msg .= "ok $Num_Tests";
+ $msg .= " - $name" if @_ == 2;
+ $msg .= "\n";
+
+ _print *TESTOUT, $msg;
+
+ #'#
+ unless( $test ) {
+ my($pack, $file, $line) = (caller)[0,1,2];
+ if( $pack eq 'Test::More' ) {
+ ($file, $line) = (caller(1))[1,2];
+ }
+ _print *TESTERR, "# Failed test ($file at line $line)\n";
+ }
+
+ return $test;
+}
+
+=back
+
+Test::Simple will start by printing number of tests run in the form
+"1..M" (so "1..5" means you're going to run 5 tests). This strange
+format lets Test::Harness know how many tests you plan on running in
+case something goes horribly wrong.
+
+If all your tests passed, Test::Simple will exit with zero (which is
+normal). If anything failed it will exit with how many failed. If
+you run less (or more) tests than you planned, the missing (or extras)
+will be considered failures. If no tests were ever run Test::Simple
+will throw a warning and exit with 255. If the test died, even after
+having successfully completed all its tests, it will still be
+considered a failure and will exit with 255.
+
+So the exit codes are...
+
+ 0 all tests successful
+ 255 test died
+ any other number how many failed (including missing or extras)
+
+If you fail more than 254 tests, it will be reported as 254.
+
+=begin _private
+
+=over 4
+
+=item B<_sanity_check>
+
+ _sanity_check();
+
+Runs a bunch of end of test sanity checks to make sure reality came
+through ok. If anything is wrong it will die with a fairly friendly
+error message.
+
+=cut
+
+#'#
+sub _sanity_check {
+ _whoa($Num_Tests < 0, 'Says here you ran a negative number of tests!');
+ _whoa(!$Have_Plan and $Num_Tests,
+ 'Somehow your tests ran without a plan!');
+ _whoa($Num_Tests != @Test_Results,
+ 'Somehow you got a different number of results than tests ran!');
+}
+
+=item B<_whoa>
+
+ _whoa($check, $description);
+
+A sanity check, similar to assert(). If the $check is true, something
+has gone horribly wrong. It will die with the given $description and
+a note to contact the author.
+
+=cut
+
+sub _whoa {
+ my($check, $desc) = @_;
+ if( $check ) {
+ die <<WHOA;
+WHOA! $desc
+This should never happen! Please contact the author immediately!
+WHOA
+ }
+}
+
+=item B<_my_exit>
+
+ _my_exit($exit_num);
+
+Perl seems to have some trouble with exiting inside an END block. 5.005_03
+and 5.6.1 both seem to do odd things. Instead, this function edits $?
+directly. It should ONLY be called from inside an END block. It
+doesn't actually exit, that's your job.
+
+=cut
+
+sub _my_exit {
+ $? = $_[0];
+ return 1;
+}
+
+
+=back
+
+=end _private
+
+=cut
+
+$SIG{__DIE__} = sub {
+ # We don't want to muck with death in an eval, but $^S isn't
+ # totally reliable. 5.005_03 and 5.6.1 both do the wrong thing
+ # with it. Instead, we use caller. This also means it runs under
+ # 5.004!
+ my $in_eval = 0;
+ for( my $stack = 1; my $sub = (caller($stack))[3]; $stack++ ) {
+ $in_eval = 1 if $sub =~ /^\(eval\)/;
+ }
+ $Test_Died = 1 unless $in_eval;
+};
+
+END {
+ _sanity_check();
+
+ # Bailout if import() was never called. This is so
+ # "require Test::Simple" doesn't puke.
+ do{ _my_exit(0) && return } if !$Have_Plan and !$Num_Tests;
+
+ # Figure out if we passed or failed and print helpful messages.
+ if( $Num_Tests ) {
+ # The plan? We have no plan.
+ unless( $Planned_Tests ) {
+ _print *TESTOUT, "1..$Num_Tests\n";
+ $Planned_Tests = $Num_Tests;
+ }
+
+ my $num_failed = grep !$_, @Test_Results[0..$Planned_Tests-1];
+ $num_failed += abs($Planned_Tests - @Test_Results);
+
+ if( $Num_Tests < $Planned_Tests ) {
+ _print *TESTERR, <<"FAIL";
+# Looks like you planned $Planned_Tests tests but only ran $Num_Tests.
+FAIL
+ }
+ elsif( $Num_Tests > $Planned_Tests ) {
+ my $num_extra = $Num_Tests - $Planned_Tests;
+ _print *TESTERR, <<"FAIL";
+# Looks like you planned $Planned_Tests tests but ran $num_extra extra.
+FAIL
+ }
+ elsif ( $num_failed ) {
+ _print *TESTERR, <<"FAIL";
+# Looks like you failed $num_failed tests of $Planned_Tests.
+FAIL
+ }
+
+ if( $Test_Died ) {
+ _print *TESTERR, <<"FAIL";
+# Looks like your test died just after $Num_Tests.
+FAIL
+
+ _my_exit( 255 ) && return;
+ }
+
+ _my_exit( $num_failed <= 254 ? $num_failed : 254 ) && return;
+ }
+ elsif ( $Test::Simple::Skip_All ) {
+ _my_exit( 0 ) && return;
+ }
+ else {
+ _print *TESTERR, "# No tests run!\n";
+ _my_exit( 255 ) && return;
+ }
+}
+
+
+=pod
+
+This module is by no means trying to be a complete testing system.
+Its just to get you started. Once you're off the ground its
+recommended you look at L<Test::More>.
+
+
+=head1 EXAMPLE
+
+Here's an example of a simple .t file for the fictional Film module.
+
+ use Test::Simple tests => 5;
+
+ use Film; # What you're testing.
+
+ my $btaste = Film->new({ Title => 'Bad Taste',
+ Director => 'Peter Jackson',
+ Rating => 'R',
+ NumExplodingSheep => 1
+ });
+ ok( defined($btaste) and ref $btaste eq 'Film', 'new() works' );
+
+ ok( $btaste->Title eq 'Bad Taste', 'Title() get' );
+ ok( $btsate->Director eq 'Peter Jackson', 'Director() get' );
+ ok( $btaste->Rating eq 'R', 'Rating() get' );
+ ok( $btaste->NumExplodingSheep == 1, 'NumExplodingSheep() get' );
+
+It will produce output like this:
+
+ 1..5
+ ok 1 - new() works
+ ok 2 - Title() get
+ ok 3 - Director() get
+ not ok 4 - Rating() get
+ ok 5 - NumExplodingSheep() get
+
+Indicating the Film::Rating() method is broken.
+
+
+=head1 CAVEATS
+
+Test::Simple will only report a maximum of 254 failures in its exit
+code. If this is a problem, you probably have a huge test script.
+Split it into multiple files. (Otherwise blame the Unix folks for
+using an unsigned short integer as the exit status).
+
+
+=head1 HISTORY
+
+This module was conceived while talking with Tony Bowden in his
+kitchen one night about the problems I was having writing some really
+complicated feature into the new Testing module. He observed that the
+main problem is not dealing with these edge cases but that people hate
+to write tests B<at all>. What was needed was a dead simple module
+that took all the hard work out of testing and was really, really easy
+to learn. Paul Johnson simultaneously had this idea (unfortunately,
+he wasn't in Tony's kitchen). This is it.
+
+
+=head1 AUTHOR
+
+Idea by Tony Bowden and Paul Johnson, code by Michael G Schwern
+<schwern@pobox.com>, wardrobe by Calvin Klein.
+
+
+=head1 SEE ALSO
+
+=over 4
+
+=item L<Test::More>
+
+More testing functions! Once you outgrow Test::Simple, look at
+Test::More. Test::Simple is 100% forward compatible with Test::More
+(ie. you can just use Test::More instead of Test::Simple in your
+programs and things will still work).
+
+=item L<Test>
+
+The original Perl testing module.
+
+=item L<Test::Unit>
+
+Elaborate unit testing.
+
+=item L<Pod::Tests>, L<SelfTest>
+
+Embed tests in your code!
+
+=item L<Test::Harness>
+
+Interprets the output of your test program.
+
+=back
+
+=cut
+
+1;