These macros automatically adjust the stack for you, if needed. Thus, you
do not need to call C<EXTEND> to extend the stack.
+However, see L</Putting a C value on Perl stack>
For more information, consult L<perlxs> and L<perlxstut>.
directly used in some opcodes, as well as indirectly in zillions of
others, which use it via C<(X)PUSH[pni]>.
+Because the target is reused, you must be careful when pushing multiple
+values on the stack. The following code will not do what you think:
+
+ XPUSHi(10);
+ XPUSHi(20);
+
+This translates as "set C<TARG> to 10, push a pointer to C<TARG> onto
+the stack; set C<TARG> to 20, push a pointer to C<TARG> onto the stack".
+At the end of the operation, the stack does not contain the values 10
+and 20, but actually contains two pointers to C<TARG>, which we have set
+to 20. If you need to push multiple different values, use C<XPUSHs>,
+which bypasses C<TARG>.
+
+On a related note, if you do use C<(X)PUSH[npi]>, then you're going to
+need a C<dTARG> in your variable declarations so that the C<*PUSH*>
+macros can make use of the local variable C<TARG>.
+
=head2 Scratchpads
The question remains on when the SVs which are I<target>s for opcodes