Irix update
>>>>> "A" == Andy Dougherty <doughera@fractal.phys.lafayette.edu> writes:
A> On 17 Apr 1997, Scott Henry wrote:
>> My recommendation is that irix_6_3.sh, irix_6_4.sh should be
>> duplicates of (the recently changed) irix_6_2.sh. As best as I can
>> determine this far ahead of release, irix_6_5.sh will be the same,
>> too.
A> In which case, they should all just be irix_6.sh. If 6.0 and 6.1 need
A> separate hints files, then we can have irix_6_0.sh and irix_6_1.sh.
A> If we use the generic irix_6.sh, then
A> 1. We don't have pointless, error-prone duplication of hint files.
A> 2. We magically get covered even when 6.5 and 6.6 are released and we're
A> still stuck at 5.004. :-)
EXCELLENT idea! I'll make up my patch that way.
[editor's note: the patch never hit the mailing list, but this message
seems relevant]
p5p-msgid: yd8afmwnu80.fsf@hoshi.engr.sgi.com
private-msgid: yd8d8rsi0ln.fsf@hoshi.engr.sgi.com