On further examination, this test is bogus. If you subclass a Moose
authorDave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:39:20 +0000 (22:39 +0000)
committerDave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:39:20 +0000 (22:39 +0000)
commit924c3670b02bb93b1e0e275f0c4e05590e338615
tree25558b6a652fe8a8644bba8e1087e0ac53ca7514
parent17eddac06af36ca4af62d783fd070d8416412a06
On further examination, this test is bogus. If you subclass a Moose
class via "use base" and not "extends", you don't get to complain that
Moose finds a metaclass incompatibility. When you call "extends" Moose
explicitly fixes said incompatibility.
t/050_metaclasses/017_traits_plain_subclass.t [deleted file]