There's no point making the new metaclass for immutable metaclasses
authorDave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:10:47 +0000 (11:10 -0500)
committerDave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org>
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:02:02 +0000 (13:02 -0500)
commit505797c102fd557028b46f7c68e31d02a87bfdb9
treeff13524ca611168d140b06c2477906d7e3d11087
parent9d61c6b1cf517ec84a82b1a57f05da8ac332c655
There's no point making the new metaclass for immutable metaclasses
immutable itself. We will never construct an object (we just rebless),
so there's no constructor to inline, and it's relatively uncommon to
need to introspect the new class.
lib/Class/MOP/Class.pm