X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=t%2F00new.t;h=989a0b2bccb2b4dfab716a4c4d6680cf71996f1c;hb=96449e8ea5159e5448ebfc81dfa200dc674f366b;hp=b90dc8a998ed492355eca1d0c3d910920f299606;hpb=8a68b5be44b4394787aa83b8b452403b3214e16e;p=scpubgit%2FQ-Branch.git diff --git a/t/00new.t b/t/00new.t old mode 100755 new mode 100644 index b90dc8a..989a0b2 --- a/t/00new.t +++ b/t/00new.t @@ -4,16 +4,28 @@ use strict; use warnings; use Test::More; +use FindBin; +use lib "$FindBin::Bin"; +use TestSqlAbstract; + plan tests => 15; use_ok('SQL::Abstract'); +#LDNOTE: renamed all "bind" into "where" because that's what they are + + my @handle_tests = ( #1 { args => {logic => 'OR'}, - stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? OR b = ? )' +# stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? OR b = ? )' +# LDNOTE: modified the line above (changing the test suite!!!) because +# the test was not consistent with the doc: hashrefs should not be +# influenced by the current logic, they always mean 'AND'. So +# { a => 4, b => 0} should ALWAYS mean ( a = ? AND b = ? ). + stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? AND b = ? )' }, #2 { @@ -33,7 +45,9 @@ my @handle_tests = ( #5 { args => {cmp => "=", logic => 'or'}, - stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? OR b = ? )' +# LDNOTE idem +# stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? OR b = ? )' + stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a = ? AND b = ? )' }, #6 { @@ -43,7 +57,9 @@ my @handle_tests = ( #7 { args => {logic => "or", cmp => "like"}, - stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a LIKE ? OR b LIKE ? )' +# LDNOTE idem +# stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a LIKE ? OR b LIKE ? )' + stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( a LIKE ? AND b LIKE ? )' }, #8 { @@ -74,25 +90,40 @@ my @handle_tests = ( { args => {convert => "lower"}, stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( ( LOWER(ticket) = LOWER(?) ) OR ( LOWER(hostname) = LOWER(?) ) OR ( LOWER(taco) = LOWER(?) ) OR ( LOWER(salami) = LOWER(?) ) )', - bind => [ { ticket => 11 }, { hostname => 11 }, { taco => 'salad' }, { salami => 'punch' } ], + where => [ { ticket => 11 }, { hostname => 11 }, { taco => 'salad' }, { salami => 'punch' } ], }, #14 { args => {convert => "upper"}, - stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( ( UPPER(hostname) IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) AND ( ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) ) ) OR ( UPPER(tack) BETWEEN UPPER(?) AND UPPER(?) ) OR ( ( ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) ) AND ( ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) ) AND UPPER(q) NOT IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) ) )', - bind => [ { ticket => [11, 12, 13], hostname => { in => ['ntf', 'avd', 'bvd', '123'] } }, +# LDNOTE : modified the test below, because modified the semantics +# of "e => { '!=', [qw(f g)] }" : generating "e != 'f' OR e != 'g'" +# is nonsense (will always be true whatever the value of e). Since +# this is a 'negative' operator, we must apply the Morgan laws and +# interpret it as "e != 'f' AND e != 'g'" (and actually the user +# should rather write "e => {-not_in => [qw/f g/]}". + +# stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( ( UPPER(hostname) IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) AND ( ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) ) ) OR ( UPPER(tack) BETWEEN UPPER(?) AND UPPER(?) ) OR ( ( ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) ) AND ( ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) ) AND UPPER(q) NOT IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) ) )', + stmt => 'SELECT * FROM test WHERE ( ( UPPER(hostname) IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) AND ( ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(ticket) = UPPER(?) ) ) ) OR ( UPPER(tack) BETWEEN UPPER(?) AND UPPER(?) ) OR ( ( ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) OR ( UPPER(a) = UPPER(?) ) ) AND ( ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) AND ( UPPER(e) != UPPER(?) ) ) AND UPPER(q) NOT IN ( UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?), UPPER(?) ) ) )', + where => [ { ticket => [11, 12, 13], + hostname => { in => ['ntf', 'avd', 'bvd', '123'] } }, { tack => { between => [qw/tick tock/] } }, - { a => [qw/b c d/], e => { '!=', [qw(f g)] }, q => { 'not in', [14..20] } } ], + { a => [qw/b c d/], + e => { '!=', [qw(f g)] }, + q => { 'not in', [14..20] } } ], }, ); for (@handle_tests) { - local $" = ', '; - #print "creating a handle with args ($_->{args}): "; - my $sql = SQL::Abstract->new($_->{args}); - my $bind = $_->{bind} || { a => 4, b => 0}; - my($stmt, @bind) = $sql->select('test', '*', $bind); - ok($stmt eq $_->{stmt} && @bind); + local $" = ', '; + #print "creating a handle with args ($_->{args}): "; + my $sql = SQL::Abstract->new($_->{args}); + my $where = $_->{where} || { a => 4, b => 0}; + my($stmt, @bind) = $sql->select('test', '*', $where); + + # LDNOTE: this original test suite from NWIGER did no comparisons + # on @bind values, just checking if @bind is nonempty. + # So here we just fake a [1] bind value for the comparison. + is_same_sql_bind($stmt, [@bind ? 1 : 0], $_->{stmt}, [1]); }