X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=pod%2Fperltodo.pod;h=00effc392fb7f2bc9c13db1900f7576ac2bf7cc4;hb=953f6acfa20ec275ec39a552dfac8124bd93ebdf;hp=53158e7848e2ef7a3453dba9c2808eeadfe15047;hpb=e99d581a4aaa3c92d0b0dda6799157fe7a569f31;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git diff --git a/pod/perltodo.pod b/pod/perltodo.pod index 53158e7..00effc3 100644 --- a/pod/perltodo.pod +++ b/pod/perltodo.pod @@ -23,6 +23,55 @@ programming languages offer you 1 line of immortality? =head1 Tasks that only need Perl knowledge +=head2 Smartmatch design issues + +In 5.10.0 the smartmatch operator C<~~> isn't working quite "right". But +before we can fix the implementation, we need to define what "right" is. +The first problem is that Robin Houston implemented the Perl 6 smart match +spec as of February 2006, when smart match was axiomatically symmetrical: +L + +Since then the Perl 6 target moved, but the Perl 5 implementation did not. + +So it would be useful for someone to compare the Perl 6 smartmatch table +as of February 2006 L +and the current table L +and tabulate the differences in Perl 6. The annotated view of changes is +L and the diff is +C +-- search for C<=head1 Smart matching>. (In theory F can generate that, +but in practice when I tried it hung forever, I assume "thinking") + +With that done and published, someone (else) can then map any changed Perl 6 +semantics back to Perl 5, based on how the existing semantics map to Perl 5: +L + + +There are also some questions that need answering: + +=over 4 + +=item * + +How do you negate one? (documentation issue) +http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-01/msg00071.html + +=item * + +Array behaviors +http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2007-12/msg00799.html + +* Should smart matches be symmetrical? (Perl 6 says no) + +* Other differences between Perl 5 and Perl 6 smart match? + +=item * + +Objects and smart match +http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2007-12/msg00865.html + +=back + =head2 Remove duplication of test setup. Schwern notes, that there's duplication of code - lots and lots of tests have @@ -30,12 +79,6 @@ some variation on the big block of C<$Is_Foo> checks. We can safely put this into a file, change it to build an C<%Is> hash and require it. Maybe just put it into F. Throw in the handy tainting subroutines. -=head2 common test code for timed bail out - -Write portable self destruct code for tests to stop them burning CPU in -infinite loops. This needs to avoid using alarm, as some of the tests are -testing alarm/sleep or timers. - =head2 POD -E HTML conversion in the core still sucks Which is crazy given just how simple POD purports to be, and how simple HTML @@ -48,43 +91,17 @@ is needed to improve the cross-linking. The addition of C and its related modules may make this task easier to complete. -=head2 merge checkpods and podchecker - -F (and C in the F subdirectory) -implements a very basic check for pod files, but the errors it discovers -aren't found by podchecker. Add this check to podchecker, get rid of -checkpods and have C use podchecker. - =head2 Parallel testing (This probably impacts much more than the core: also the Test::Harness and TAP::* modules on CPAN.) -The core regression test suite is getting ever more comprehensive, which has -the side effect that it takes longer to run. This isn't so good. Investigate -whether it would be feasible to give the harness script the B