X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=pad.c;h=e8ba1394347897ac549b05625b60d86182619f67;hb=789bd863840ef4ff6c46f7c2ee0f3f64e0b5daa6;hp=c7a18c22110b4057530b8d2c26c76778cc1fa756;hpb=6de654a5795b6f7915432ff16bcdac0688492a9b;p=p5sagit%2Fp5-mst-13.2.git diff --git a/pad.c b/pad.c index c7a18c2..e8ba139 100644 --- a/pad.c +++ b/pad.c @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ Perl_pad_new(pTHX_ int flags) */ AV * const a0 = newAV(); /* will be @_ */ - av_extend(a0, 0); av_store(pad, 0, MUTABLE_SV(a0)); AvREIFY_only(a0); } @@ -421,13 +420,13 @@ Perl_pad_add_name(pTHX_ const char *name, const STRLEN len, const U32 flags, PL_min_intro_pending = offset; PL_max_intro_pending = offset; /* if it's not a simple scalar, replace with an AV or HV */ - /* XXX DAPM since slot has been allocated, replace - * av_store with PL_curpad[offset] ? */ + assert(SvTYPE(PL_curpad[offset]) == SVt_NULL); + assert(SvREFCNT(PL_curpad[offset]) == 1); if (*name == '@') - av_store(PL_comppad, offset, MUTABLE_SV(newAV())); + sv_upgrade(PL_curpad[offset], SVt_PVAV); else if (*name == '%') - av_store(PL_comppad, offset, MUTABLE_SV(newHV())); - SvPADMY_on(PL_curpad[offset]); + sv_upgrade(PL_curpad[offset], SVt_PVHV); + assert(SvPADMY(PL_curpad[offset])); DEBUG_Xv(PerlIO_printf(Perl_debug_log, "Pad addname: %ld \"%s\" new lex=0x%"UVxf"\n", (long)offset, name, PTR2UV(PL_curpad[offset]))); @@ -705,6 +704,28 @@ Perl_find_rundefsvoffset(pTHX) } /* + * Returns a lexical $_, if there is one, at run time ; or the global one + * otherwise. + */ + +SV * +Perl_find_rundefsv(pTHX) +{ + SV *namesv; + int flags; + PADOFFSET po; + + po = pad_findlex("$_", find_runcv(NULL), PL_curcop->cop_seq, 1, + NULL, &namesv, &flags); + + if (po == NOT_IN_PAD + || (SvFLAGS(namesv) & (SVpad_NAME|SVpad_OUR)) == (SVpad_NAME|SVpad_OUR)) + return DEFSV; + + return PAD_SVl(po); +} + +/* =for apidoc pad_findlex Find a named lexical anywhere in a chain of nested pads. Add fake entries @@ -1299,27 +1320,37 @@ Perl_pad_tidy(pTHX_ padtidy_type type) else if (type == padtidy_SUB) { /* XXX DAPM this same bit of code keeps appearing !!! Rationalise? */ AV * const av = newAV(); /* Will be @_ */ - av_extend(av, 0); av_store(PL_comppad, 0, MUTABLE_SV(av)); AvREIFY_only(av); } - /* XXX DAPM rationalise these two similar branches */ - - if (type == padtidy_SUB) { + if (type == padtidy_SUB || type == padtidy_FORMAT) { + SV * const * const namep = AvARRAY(PL_comppad_name); PADOFFSET ix; for (ix = AvFILLp(PL_comppad); ix > 0; ix--) { if (SvIMMORTAL(PL_curpad[ix]) || IS_PADGV(PL_curpad[ix]) || IS_PADCONST(PL_curpad[ix])) continue; - if (!SvPADMY(PL_curpad[ix])) - SvPADTMP_on(PL_curpad[ix]); - } - } - else if (type == padtidy_FORMAT) { - PADOFFSET ix; - for (ix = AvFILLp(PL_comppad); ix > 0; ix--) { - if (!SvPADMY(PL_curpad[ix]) && !SvIMMORTAL(PL_curpad[ix])) + if (!SvPADMY(PL_curpad[ix])) { SvPADTMP_on(PL_curpad[ix]); + } else if (!SvFAKE(namep[ix])) { + /* This is a work around for how the current implementation of + ?{ } blocks in regexps interacts with lexicals. + + One of our lexicals. + Can't do this on all lexicals, otherwise sub baz() won't + compile in + + my $foo; + + sub bar { ++$foo; } + + sub baz { ++$foo; } + + because completion of compiling &bar calling pad_tidy() + would cause (top level) $foo to be marked as stale, and + "no longer available". */ + SvPADSTALE_on(PL_curpad[ix]); + } } } PL_curpad = AvARRAY(PL_comppad); @@ -1731,7 +1762,6 @@ Perl_pad_push(pTHX_ PADLIST *padlist, int depth) } } av = newAV(); - av_extend(av, 0); av_store(newpad, 0, MUTABLE_SV(av)); AvREIFY_only(av); @@ -1781,6 +1811,7 @@ Perl_padlist_dup(pTHX_ AV *const srcpad, CLONE_PARAMS *const param) I32 ix = AvFILLp((const AV *)AvARRAY(srcpad)[1]); AV *pad1; + const I32 names_fill = AvFILLp((const AV *)(AvARRAY(srcpad)[0])); const AV *const srcpad1 = (const AV *) AvARRAY(srcpad)[1]; SV **oldpad = AvARRAY(srcpad1); SV **names; @@ -1812,7 +1843,53 @@ Perl_padlist_dup(pTHX_ AV *const srcpad, CLONE_PARAMS *const param) AvFILLp(pad1) = ix; for ( ;ix > 0; ix--) { - pad1a[ix] = sv_dup_inc(oldpad[ix], param); + if (!oldpad[ix]) { + pad1a[ix] = NULL; + } else if (names_fill >= ix && names[ix] != &PL_sv_undef) { + const char sigil = SvPVX_const(names[ix])[0]; + if ((SvFLAGS(names[ix]) & SVf_FAKE) + || (SvFLAGS(names[ix]) & SVpad_STATE) + || sigil == '&') + { + /* outer lexical or anon code */ + pad1a[ix] = sv_dup_inc(oldpad[ix], param); + } + else { /* our own lexical */ + if(SvPADSTALE(oldpad[ix]) && SvREFCNT(oldpad[ix]) > 1) { + /* This is a work around for how the current + implementation of ?{ } blocks in regexps + interacts with lexicals. */ + pad1a[ix] = sv_dup_inc(oldpad[ix], param); + } else { + SV *sv; + + if (sigil == '@') + sv = MUTABLE_SV(newAV()); + else if (sigil == '%') + sv = MUTABLE_SV(newHV()); + else + sv = newSV(0); + pad1a[ix] = sv; + SvPADMY_on(sv); + } + } + } + else if (IS_PADGV(oldpad[ix]) || IS_PADCONST(oldpad[ix])) { + pad1a[ix] = sv_dup_inc(oldpad[ix], param); + } + else { + /* save temporaries on recursion? */ + SV * const sv = newSV(0); + pad1a[ix] = sv; + + /* SvREFCNT(oldpad[ix]) != 1 for some code in threads.xs + FIXTHAT before merging this branch. + (And I know how to) */ + if (SvPADMY(oldpad[ix])) + SvPADMY_on(sv); + else + SvPADTMP_on(sv); + } } if (oldpad[0]) {