X-Git-Url: http://git.shadowcat.co.uk/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?a=blobdiff_plain;f=TODO;h=ebf0b193481f2b93960b1790f34f9ba5182cd3cd;hb=4634d3ad94751c1c3c268d0ceb95398da96eb575;hp=4a1940019d9a6351ee02694dd3cbfe0860992445;hpb=4e48cc96e4b7788c03a9b4268f6029a12b8039bb;p=catagits%2FCatalyst-Runtime.git diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 4a19400..ebf0b19 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1,44 +1,130 @@ -Pre 0004: +# Known Bugs: - - Certain errors in your application to do with using other code which does - not exist can cause an 'Unknown error' issue. + - Bug ->go or ->visit causes actions which have Args or CaptureArgs called + twice when called via ->go or ->visit. - This is now fixed, by moving back to B::Hooks::EndOfScope, but this (used - to) cause issues with the following modules: + Test app: http://github.com/bobtfish/catalyst-app-bug-go_chain/tree/master - - Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie - - Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-FastMmap - - Catalyst-Plugin-Session-PerUser - - Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-File - - Catalyst-Authentication-Credential-HTTP - - Catalyst-Plugin-SmartURI +# Compatibility warnings to add: - according to comments in r8991. Retest these before shipping anything.. + - $self->config should warn as config should only ever be called as a + class method (TESTS). - - Document method modifiers called on things before setup not working in your app class. +# Proposed functionality / feature additions: -Known Bugs: +## Log setup needs to be less lame - - Bug ->go or ->visit causes actions which have Args or CaptureArgs caled - twice when called via ->go or ->visit. +So Catalyst::Plugin::Log::* can die +in a fire. Having $c->log_class would be a good start. kane volunteered +to do some of this. + +Simple example: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Colorful should just be a +subclass of Catalyst::Log, no ::Plugin:: needed. + +See also: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Dispatch and +http://github.com/willert/catalyst-plugin-log4perl-simple/tree + +# REFACTORING + +## The horrible hack for plugin setup - replacing it: + + * Have a look at the Devel::REPL BEFORE_PLUGIN stuff + I wonder if what we need is that combined with plugins-as-roles + +## App / ctx split: + + NOTE - these are notes that t0m thought up after doing back compat for + catalyst_component_class, may be inaccurate, wrong or missing things + bug mst (at least) to correct before trying more than the first 2 + steps. Please knock yourself out on the first two however :) + + - Eliminate actions in MyApp from the main test suite + - Uncomment warning in C::C::register_action_methods, add tests it works + by mocking out the logging.. + - Remove MyApp @ISA controller (ask metaclass if it has attributes, and if + so you need back compat :/) + - Make Catalyst::Context, move the per request stuff in there, handles from + main app class to delegate + - Make an instance of the app class which is a global variable + - Make new instance of the context class, not the app class per-request + - Remove the components as class data, move to instance data on the app + class (you probably have to do this for _all_ the class data, good luck!) + - Make it possible for users to spin up different instances of the app class + (with different config etc each) + - Profit! (Things like changing the complete app config per vhost, i.e. + writing a config loader / app class role which dispatches per vhost to + differently configured apps is piss easy) + +## GSOC + +### Next large steps: + + - Moving setup_components etc into the container + + - Move setup_components down into the container (setup_components becomes a one or two line method in Catalyst.pm) + + - refactor / cleanup setup_component + + - Move locate_components + + - Move contents of setup_components + + - Finished documentation for ::IOC parts. + + - Creating service()-like sugar for component + + - Test cases for extending the container in an application. + - Using the sugar added in the previous item + - Test when Model::Foo depends_on Model::Bar + + - Allowing people to change component lifecycles + + role Service::WithAcceptContext {} + role Service::WithCOMPONENT {} + class Service::CatalystComponent extends Service with (WithAcceptContext, WithCOMPONENT) {} + + a) configure additional services in that container + - super simple container $default_container => as { more services }; + class MyApp::Container extends Catalyst::Container { + use Bread::Board; # Or our own sugar? + method BUILD { container $self => as { + service model => ...; # some constructor injection to MyApp::Model or something + container Model => as { + component Foo => (dependencies => ['/model']); # As per default! + component Bar => (dependencies => ['/model/Foo']); # Magic! + }; + # Note - implementation of BB may need to be changed to support making sure existing + # services actually get overridden. not sure how the default container behaves when doing that + # above code would build the constructor injection as it currently does, + # defaulting to the class name in the right namespace as declared by the surrounding container + # as well as adding using the catalyst-specific service class + } } + }; + b) make component services depend on that, and - Test app: http://github.com/bobtfish/catalyst-app-bug-go_chain/tree/master -Compatibility warnings to add: + c) ask for those + services declared in a) outside of a web context + simple as well. $customised_container->fetch('service')->get # or whatever the api was - - $self->config should warn as config should only ever be called as a - class method. +19:23 < andrewalker> edenc, when explaining to me how it should be, drafted this: https://gist.github.com/1098186 +19:26 < edenc> I like the possibility of being able to provide a backwards-compatible structure which we can muck around with by configuring B::B +19:26 <@rafl> so, the request context clearly isn't a service +19:27 <@rafl> but that's ok. there's parametrised services +19:27 < edenc> yeah, that was a draft +19:27 <@rafl> the outer Foo service is pretty much what i'd expect Service::WithAcceptContext to do, except with a dependency on a context instead of a service parameter +19:32 <@rafl> actually having services for the pre-ACCEPT_CONTEXT bits is what i want to think about -Proposed functionality / feature additions: +### To polish off - - Log setup needs to be less lame, so Catalyst::Plugin::Log::* can die - in a fire. Having $c->log_class would be a good start. kane volunteered - to do some of this. + - Document current methods + - + $class->container->get_sub_container('model')->make_single_default; ++ $class->container->get_sub_container('view')->make_single_default; - Simple example: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Colorful should just be a - subclass of Catalyst::Log, no ::Plugin:: needed. +### Known issues - See also: Catalyst::Plugin::Log::Dispatch and - http://github.com/willert/catalyst-plugin-log4perl-simple/tree + - Broken $instance->expand_modules() in setup_components and figure + out later how to bring it back + - expand_component_module