@INC = '../lib';
}
use warnings;
-print "1..129\n";
+print "1..143\n";
# these shouldn't hang
{
sort { while(1) {} } @a;
sort { while(1) { last; } } @a;
sort { while(0) { last; } } @a;
+
+ # Change 26011: Re: A surprising segfault
+ map scalar(sort(+())), ('')x68;
}
sub Backwards { $a lt $b ? 1 : $a gt $b ? -1 : 0 }
sub Backwards_stacked($$) { my($a,$b) = @_; $a lt $b ? 1 : $a gt $b ? -1 : 0 }
+sub Backwards_other { $a lt $b ? 1 : $a gt $b ? -1 : 0 }
my $upperfirst = 'A' lt 'a';
print ("@b" eq '1 2 3 4' ? "ok 16\n" : "not ok 16\n");
print "# x = '@b'\n";
-# redefining sort sub inside the sort sub should fail
-sub twoface { *twoface = sub { $a <=> $b }; &twoface }
+# redefining sort sub inside the sort sub should not fail
+sub twoface { no warnings 'redefine'; *twoface = sub { $a <=> $b }; &twoface }
eval { @b = sort twoface 4,1,3,2 };
-print ($@ =~ /redefine active sort/ ? "ok 17\n" : "not ok 17\n");
+print ($@ eq '' ? "ok 17\n" : "not ok 17\n");
-# redefining sort subs outside the sort should not fail
+# redefining sort subs outside the sort should also not fail
eval { no warnings 'redefine'; *twoface = sub { &Backwards } };
print $@ ? "not ok 18\n" : "ok 18\n";
{
no warnings 'redefine';
- *twoface = sub { *twoface = *Backwards; $a <=> $b };
+ *twoface = sub { *twoface = *Backwards_other; $a <=> $b };
}
-eval { @b = sort twoface 4,1 };
-print ($@ =~ /redefine active sort/ ? "ok 20\n" : "not ok 20\n");
+# The redefinition should not take effect during the sort
+eval { @b = sort twoface 4,1,9,5 };
+print (($@ eq "" && "@b" eq "1 4 5 9") ? "ok 20\n" : "not ok 20 # $@|@b\n");
{
no warnings 'redefine';
*twoface = sub {
eval 'sub twoface { $a <=> $b }';
- die($@ =~ /redefine active sort/ ? "ok 21\n" : "not ok 21\n");
+ die($@ eq "" ? "ok 21\n" : "not ok 21\n");
$a <=> $b;
};
}
eval { @b = sort twoface 4,1 };
-print $@ ? "$@" : "not ok 21\n";
+print($@ ? "$@" : "not ok 21 # $@\n");
eval <<'CODE';
my @result = sort main'Backwards 'one', 'two';
@output = reverse (0, sort(qw(C A B)));
ok "@output", "C B A 0", 'reversed sort with leading argument';
+
+eval { @output = sort {goto sub {}} 1,2; };
+print(($@ =~ /^Can't goto subroutine outside a subroutine/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+sub goto_sub {goto sub{}}
+eval { @output = sort goto_sub 1,2; };
+print(($@ =~ /^Can't goto subroutine from a sort sub/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+eval { @output = sort {goto label} 1,2; };
+print(($@ =~ /^Can't "goto" out of a pseudo block/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+sub goto_label {goto label}
+label: eval { @output = sort goto_label 1,2; };
+print(($@ =~ /^Can't "goto" out of a pseudo block/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+sub self_immolate {undef &self_immolate; $a<=>$b}
+eval { @output = sort self_immolate 1,2,3 };
+print(($@ =~ /^Can't undef active subroutine/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+{
+ my $failed = 0;
+
+ sub rec {
+ my $n = shift;
+ if (!defined($n)) { # No arg means we're being called by sort()
+ return 1;
+ }
+ if ($n<5) { rec($n+1); }
+ else { () = sort rec 1,2; }
+
+ $failed = 1 if !defined $n;
+ }
+
+ rec(1);
+ print((!$failed ? "ok " : "not ok "), $test++, " - sort from active sub\n");
+}
+
+# $a and $b are set in the package the sort() is called from,
+# *not* the package the sort sub is in. This is longstanding
+# de facto behaviour that shouldn't be broken.
+package main;
+my $answer = "ok ";
+() = sort OtherPack::foo 1,2,3,4;
+
+{
+ package OtherPack;
+ no warnings 'once';
+ sub foo {
+ $answer = "not ok " if
+ defined($a) || defined($b) || !defined($main::a) || !defined($main::b);
+ $main::a <=> $main::b;
+ }
+}
+
+print $answer, $test++, "\n";
+
+
+# Bug 36430 - sort called in package2 while a
+# sort in package1 is active should set $package2::a/b.
+
+$answer = "ok ";
+my @list = sort { A::min(@$a) <=> A::min(@$b) }
+ [3, 1, 5], [2, 4], [0];
+
+print $answer, $test++, "\n";
+
+package A;
+sub min {
+ my @list = sort {
+ $answer = "not ok " if !defined($a) || !defined($b);
+ $a <=> $b;
+ } @_;
+ $list[0];
+}
+
+# Bug 7567 - an array shouldn't be modifiable while it's being
+# sorted in-place.
+eval { @a=(1..8); @a = sort { @a = (0) } @a; };
+
+print(($@ =~ /^Modification of a read-only value attempted/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+# Sorting shouldn't increase the refcount of a sub
+sub foo {(1+$a) <=> (1+$b)}
+my $refcnt = &Internals::SvREFCNT(\&foo);
+@output = sort foo 3,7,9;
+package Foo;
+ok($refcnt, &Internals::SvREFCNT(\&foo), "sort sub refcnt");
+
+# Sorting a read-only array in-place shouldn't be allowed
+my @readonly = (1..10);
+Internals::SvREADONLY(@readonly, 1);
+eval { @readonly = sort @readonly; };
+print(($@ =~ /^Modification of a read-only value attempted/ ?
+ "ok " :
+ "not ok "),
+ $test++, " # $@");
+
+# Using return() should be okay even in a deeper context
+@b = sort {while (1) {return ($a <=> $b)} } 1..10;
+ok("@b", "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10", "return within loop");
+
+# Using return() should be okay even if there are other items
+# on the stack at the time.
+@b = sort {$_ = ($a<=>$b) + do{return $b<=> $a}} 1..10;
+ok("@b", "10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1", "return with SVs on stack");
+
+# As above, but with a sort sub rather than a sort block.
+sub ret_with_stacked { $_ = ($a<=>$b) + do {return $b <=> $a} }
+@b = sort ret_with_stacked 1..10;
+ok("@b", "10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1", "return with SVs on stack");