blead segfaults on local *@; eval {1} because ERRSV assumes that

[p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git] / t / base / lex.t

diff --git a/t/base/lex.t b/t/base/lex.t
index 7e0ca70..984cdff 100755 (executable)
--- a/t/base/lex.t
+++ b/t/base/lex.t
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 #!./perl
 
-# $RCSfile: lex.t,v $$Revision: 4.1 $$Date: 92/08/07 18:27:04 $
-
-print "1..26\n";
+print "1..55\n";
 
 $x = 'x';
 
@@ -55,8 +53,8 @@ $foo
 EOF
 EOE
 
-print <<`EOS` . <<\EOF;
-echo ok 12
+print <<'EOS' . <<\EOF;
+ok 12 - make sure single quotes are honored \nnot ok
 EOS
 ok 13
 EOF
@@ -103,3 +101,165 @@ print "${foo{$bar}}" eq "BAZ" ? "ok 23\n" : "not ok 23\n";
 print "FOO:" =~ /$foo[:]/ ? "ok 24\n" : "not ok 24\n";
 print "ABC" =~ /^$ary[$A]$/ ? "ok 25\n" : "not ok 25\n";
 print "FOOZ" =~ /^$foo[$A-Z]$/ ? "ok 26\n" : "not ok 26\n";
+
+# MJD 19980425
+($X, @X) = qw(a b c d); 
+print "d" =~ /^$X[-1]$/ ? "ok 27\n" : "not ok 27\n";
+print "a1" !~ /^$X[-1]$/ ? "ok 28\n" : "not ok 28\n";
+
+print (((q{{\{\(}} . q{{\)\}}}) eq '{{\(}{\)}}') ? "ok 29\n" : "not ok 29\n");
+
+
+$foo = "not ok 30\n";
+$foo =~ s/^not /substr(<<EOF, 0, 0)/e;
+  Ignored
+EOF
+print $foo;
+
+# Tests for new extended control-character variables
+# MJD 19990227
+
+{ my $CX = "\cX";
+  my $CXY  ="\cXY";
+  $ {$CX} = 17;
+  $ {$CXY} = 23;
+  if ($ {^XY} != 23) { print "not "  }
+  print "ok 31\n";
+ 
+# Does the syntax where we use the literal control character still work?
+  if (eval "\$ {\cX}" != 17 or $@) { print "not "  }
+  print "ok 32\n";
+
+  eval "\$\cQ = 24";                 # Literal control character
+  if ($@ or ${"\cQ"} != 24) {  print "not "  }
+  print "ok 33\n";
+  if ($^Q != 24) {  print "not "  }  # Control character escape sequence
+  print "ok 34\n";
+
+# Does the old UNBRACED syntax still do what it used to?
+  if ("$^XY" ne "17Y") { print "not " }
+  print "ok 35\n";
+
+  sub XX () { 6 }
+  $ {"\cQ\cXX"} = 119; 
+  $^Q = 5; #  This should be an unused ^Var.
+  $N = 5;
+  # The second caret here should be interpreted as an xor
+  if (($^Q^XX) != 3) { print "not " } 
+  print "ok 36\n";
+#  if (($N  ^  XX()) != 3) { print "not " } 
+#  print "ok 32\n";
+
+  # These next two tests are trying to make sure that
+  # $^FOO is always global; it doesn't make sense to `my' it.
+  # 
+
+  eval 'my $^X;';
+  print "not " unless index ($@, 'Can\'t use global $^X in "my"') > -1;
+  print "ok 37\n";
+#  print "($@)\n" if $@;
+
+  eval 'my $ {^XYZ};';
+  print "not " unless index ($@, 'Can\'t use global $^XYZ in "my"') > -1;
+  print "ok 38\n";
+#  print "($@)\n" if $@;
+
+# Now let's make sure that caret variables are all forced into the main package.
+  package Someother;
+  $^Q = 'Someother';
+  $ {^Quixote} = 'Someother 2';
+  $ {^M} = 'Someother 3';
+  package main;
+  print "not " unless $^Q eq 'Someother';
+  print "ok 39\n";
+  print "not " unless $ {^Quixote} eq 'Someother 2';
+  print "ok 40\n";
+  print "not " unless $ {^M} eq 'Someother 3';
+  print "ok 41\n";
+
+  
+}
+
+# see if eval '', s///e, and heredocs mix
+
+sub T {
+    my ($where, $num) = @_;
+    my ($p,$f,$l) = caller;
+    print "# $p:$f:$l vs /$where/\nnot " unless "$p:$f:$l" =~ /$where/;
+    print "ok $num\n";
+}
+
+my $test = 42;
+
+{
+# line 42 "plink"
+    local $_ = "not ok ";
+    eval q{
+       s/^not /<<EOT/e and T '^main:\(eval \d+\):2$', $test++;
+# fuggedaboudit
+EOT
+        print $_, $test++, "\n";
+       T('^main:\(eval \d+\):6$', $test++);
+# line 1 "plunk"
+       T('^main:plunk:1$', $test++);
+    };
+    print "# $@\nnot ok $test\n" if $@;
+    T '^main:plink:53$', $test++;
+}
+
+# tests 47--51 start here
+# tests for new array interpolation semantics:
+# arrays now *always* interpolate into "..." strings.
+# 20000522 MJD (mjd@plover.com)
+{
+  my $test = 47;
+  eval(q(">@nosuch<" eq "><")) || print "# $@", "not ";
+  print "ok $test\n";
+  ++$test;
+
+  # Look at this!  This is going to be a common error in the future:
+  eval(q("fred@example.com" eq "fred.com")) || print "# $@", "not ";
+  print "ok $test\n";
+  ++$test;
+
+  # Let's make sure that normal array interpolation still works right
+  # For some reason, this appears not to be tested anywhere else.
+  my @a = (1,2,3);
+  print +((">@a<" eq ">1 2 3<") ? '' : 'not '), "ok $test\n";
+  ++$test;
+
+  # Ditto.
+  eval(q{@nosuch = ('a', 'b', 'c'); ">@nosuch<" eq ">a b c<"}) 
+      || print "# $@", "not ";
+  print "ok $test\n";
+  ++$test;
+
+  # This isn't actually a lex test, but it's testing the same feature
+  sub makearray {
+    my @array = ('fish', 'dog', 'carrot');
+    *R::crackers = \@array;
+  }
+
+  eval(q{makearray(); ">@R::crackers<" eq ">fish dog carrot<"})
+    || print "# $@", "not ";
+  print "ok $test\n";
+  ++$test;
+}
+
+# Tests 52-54
+# => should only quote foo::bar if it isn't a real sub. AMS, 20010621
+
+sub xyz::foo { "bar" }
+my %str = (
+    foo      => 1,
+    xyz::foo => 1,
+    xyz::bar => 1,
+);
+
+my $test = 52;
+print ((exists $str{foo}      ? "" : "not ")."ok $test\n"); ++$test;
+print ((exists $str{bar}      ? "" : "not ")."ok $test\n"); ++$test;
+print ((exists $str{xyz::bar} ? "" : "not ")."ok $test\n"); ++$test;
+
+sub foo::::::bar { print "ok $test\n"; $test++ }
+foo::::::bar;