-#!perl
-
use strict;
use warnings;
namespace => 'yada',
} );
+
+
+
+# JNAP: I'm going to todo these tests, calling uri_for as a class method
+# should work, but its not really useful so I think theres not much harm
+# if someone needs this for a business case they are welcome to figure out
+# what is going
+
+TODO: {
+ local $TODO = "Need to fix using uri_for and uri_for_action as a class method";
+
+
+# this works, using $ctx
+is($context->uri_for($context->controller('Action::Chained')->action_for('endpoint')),
+ "http://127.0.0.1/foo/yada/chained/foo/end",
+ "uri_for a controller and action");
+
+
+# this fails, uri_for returns undef, why isn't this one working??
+ is( $context->uri_for_action( '/action/chained/endpoint' ),
+ 'http://127.0.0.1/chained/foo/end',
+ "uri_for a controller and action as string");
+
+# this fails, uri_for returns undef
+ is(TestApp->uri_for_action($context->controller('Action::Chained')->action_for('endpoint')),
+ "/chained/foo/end",
+ "uri_for a controller and action, called with only class name");
+
+# this fails, uri_for returns undef
+ is(TestApp->uri_for_action('/action/chained/endpoint' ),
+ "/chained/foo/end",
+ "uri_for a controller and action as string, called with only class name");
+
+# this fails, uri_for returns undef
+ is(TestApp->uri_for_action( $chained_action),
+ "/chained/foo/end",
+ "uri_for action via dispatcher, called with only class name");
+}
+
+
is($context->uri_for($context->controller('Action')),
"http://127.0.0.1/foo/yada/action/",
"uri_for a controller");