-use Test::More tests=>15; {
+use Test::More tests=>24; {
use strict;
use warnings;
use MooseX::Types -declare => [qw(
IntGreaterThanInt
UniqueInt
+ UniqueInt2
)];
+
+ ## sugar for alternative syntax: depending {} TC,TC
+ sub depending(&@) {
+ my ($coderef, $dependent_tc, $constraining_tc, @args) = @_;
+ if(@args) {
+ return (Depending[$dependent_tc,$coderef,$constraining_tc],@args);
+ } else {
+ return Depending[$dependent_tc,$coderef,$constraining_tc];
+ }
+ }
## The dependent value must exceed the constraining value
subtype IntGreaterThanInt,
as Depending[
Int,
sub {
- my ($dependent_val, $constraining_val) = @_;
- return ($dependent_val > $constraining_val) ? 1:undef;
+ my ($dependent_val, $constraining_val) = @_;
+ return ($dependent_val > $constraining_val) ? 1:undef;
},
Int,
];
ok IntGreaterThanInt->check([12,1]), "Success, 12 is greater than1.";
ok IntGreaterThanInt->check([0,-10]), "Success, 0 is greater than -10.";
- ## The dependent value cannot exist in the constraining arrayref
+ ## The dependent value cannot exist in the constraining arrayref. Also, it
+ ## (the dependent type) must exceed 2.
subtype UniqueInt,
as Depending[
Int,
sub {
my ($dependent_int, $constraining_arrayref) = @_;
- ## Yes, this is braindead way to check for uniques in an array
- ## but this doesn't require additional dependencies.
- (grep { $_ == $dependent_int} @$constraining_arrayref) ? 0:1
+ (grep { $_ == $dependent_int} @$constraining_arrayref) ? undef:1
},
ArrayRef[Int],
- ];
+ ],
+ where {
+ my ($dependent_val, $constraining_value) = @$_;
+ return $dependent_val > 2 ? 1:undef;
+ };
isa_ok UniqueInt, 'MooseX::Meta::TypeConstraint::Dependent';
ok !UniqueInt->check(['a',[1,2,3]]), '"a" not an Int';
ok !UniqueInt->check([1,['b','c']]), '"b","c" not an arrayref';
ok !UniqueInt->check([1,[1,2,3]]), 'not unique in set';
ok !UniqueInt->check([10,[1,10,15]]), 'not unique in set';
- ok UniqueInt->check([2,[3..6]]), 'PASS unique in set';
- ok UniqueInt->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+ ok !UniqueInt->check([2,[3..6]]), 'FAIL dependent is too small';
+ ok UniqueInt->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+ ok UniqueInt->check([4,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+
+ ## Basically as above, with sugar.
+ subtype UniqueInt2,
+ as depending {
+ my ($dependent_int, $constraining_arrayref) = @_;
+ (grep { $_ == $dependent_int} @$constraining_arrayref) ? undef:1
+ } Int, ArrayRef[Int],
+ where {
+ my ($dependent_val, $constraining_value) = @$_;
+ return $dependent_val > 2 ? 1:undef;
+ };
+
+ isa_ok UniqueInt2, 'MooseX::Meta::TypeConstraint::Dependent';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check(['a',[1,2,3]]), '"a" not an Int';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([1,['b','c']]), '"b","c" not an arrayref';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([1,[1,2,3]]), 'not unique in set';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([10,[1,10,15]]), 'not unique in set';
+ ok !UniqueInt2->check([2,[3..6]]), 'FAIL dependent is too small';
+ ok UniqueInt2->check([3,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+ ok UniqueInt2->check([4,[100..110]]), 'PASS unique in set';
+
+ ## Basic error messages. TODO should be it's own test
+
+ warn UniqueInt2->validate(['a',[1,2,3]]);
}