ly this hack can be replaced with the approach described at
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2007/03
/msg122415.html some day. */
- OP *matchop = pm->op_next;
- SV *lhs;
- const bool was_tainted = PL_tainted;
- if (matchop->op_flags & OPf_STACKED)
+ if(pm->op_type == OP_MATCH) {
+ SV *lhs;
+ const bool was_tainted = PL_tainted;
+ if (pm->op_flags & OPf_STACKED)
lhs = TOPs;
- else if (matchop->op_private & OPpTARGET_MY)
- lhs = PAD_SV(matchop->op_targ);
- else lhs = DEFSV;
- SvGETMAGIC(lhs);
- /* Restore the previous value of PL_tainted (which may have been
- modified by get-magic), to avoid incorrectly setting the
- RXf_TAINTED flag further down. */
- PL_tainted = was_tainted;
+ else if (pm->op_private & OPpTARGET_MY)
+ lhs = PAD_SV(pm->op_targ);
+ else lhs = DEFSV;
+ SvGETMAGIC(lhs);
+ /* Restore the previous value of PL_tainted (which may have been
+ modified by get-magic), to avoid incorrectly setting the
+ RXf_TAINTED flag further down. */
+ PL_tainted = was_tainted;
+ }
re = reg_temp_copy(NULL, re);
ReREFCNT_dec(PM_GETRE(pm));
}
}
+/*
+=for apidoc docatch
+
+Check for the cases 0 or 3 of cur_env.je_ret, only used inside an eval context.
+
+0 is used as continue inside eval,
+
+3 is used for a die caught by an inner eval - continue inner loop
+
+See cop.h: je_mustcatch, when set at any runlevel to TRUE, means eval ops must
+establish a local jmpenv to handle exception traps.
+
+=cut
+*/
STATIC OP *
S_docatch(pTHX_ OP *o)
{
return NULL;
}
+/* James Bond: Do you expect me to talk?
+ Auric Goldfinger: No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die.
+
+ This code is an ugly hack, doesn't work with lexicals in subroutines that are
+ called more than once, and is only used by regcomp.c, for (?{}) blocks.
+
+ Currently it is not used outside the core code. Best if it stays that way.
+*/
OP *
Perl_sv_compile_2op(pTHX_ SV *sv, OP** startop, const char *code, PAD** padp)
/* sv Text to convert to OP tree. */
/* startop op_free() this to undo. */
/* code Short string id of the caller. */
{
- /* FIXME - how much of this code is common with pp_entereval? */
dVAR; dSP; /* Make POPBLOCK work. */
PERL_CONTEXT *cx;
SV **newsp;