An obsoleted diagnostic.

[p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git] / pod / perltodo.pod

diff --git a/pod/perltodo.pod b/pod/perltodo.pod
index a6ca1f1..f12b10f 100644 (file)
--- a/pod/perltodo.pod
+++ b/pod/perltodo.pod
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ We need regression/sanity tests for suidperl
 
 This value may or may not be accurate, but it certainly is
 eye-catching.  For some things perl5 is faster than perl4, but often
-the reliability and extensability have come at a cost of speed.  The
+the reliability and extensibility have come at a cost of speed.  The
 benchmark suite that Gisle released earlier has been hailed as both a
 fantastic solution and as a source of entirely meaningless figures.
 Do we need to test "real applications"?  Can you do so?  Anyone have
@@ -161,11 +161,11 @@ Sarathy, I believe, did the work.  Here's what he has to say:
 
 Yeah, I hope to implement it someday too.  The points that were
 raised in TPC2 were all to do with calling DESTROY() methods, but
-I think we can accomodate that by extending bless() to stash
+I think we can accommodate that by extending bless() to stash
 extra information for objects so we track their lifetime accurately
 for those that want their DESTROY() to be predictable (this will be
 a speed hit, naturally, and will therefore be optional, naturally. :)
-    
+
 [N.B. Don't even ask me about this now!  When I have the time to
 write a cogent summary, I'll post it.]
 
@@ -321,14 +321,14 @@ We need something in the vicinity of:
   No documentation for perl function `random stuff' found
   The following entry in perlfunc.pod matches /random/a:
     =item rand EXPR
-     
+
     =item rand
-     
+
     Returns a random fractional number greater than or equal to C<0> and less
     than the value of EXPR.  (EXPR should be positive.)  If EXPR is
     omitted, the value C<1> is used.  Automatically calls C<srand()> unless
     C<srand()> has already been called.  See also C<srand()>.
-     
+
     (Note: If your rand function consistently returns numbers that are too
     large or too small, then your version of Perl was probably compiled
     with the wrong number of RANDBITS.)
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ See Time::HiRes.
 
 =head2 autocroak?
 
-This is the Fatal.pm module, so any builtin that that does
+This is the Fatal.pm module, so any builtin that does
 not return success automatically die()s.  If you're feeling brave, tie
 this in with the unified exceptions scheme.