aren't found by podchecker. Add this check to podchecker, get rid of
checkpods and have C<make check> use podchecker.
-=head2 perlmodlib.PL rewrite
-
-Currently perlmodlib.PL needs to be run from a source directory where perl
-has been built, or some modules won't be found, and others will be
-skipped. Make it run from a clean perl source tree (so it's reproducible).
-
=head2 Parallel testing
(This probably impacts much more than the core: also the Test::Harness
To make a minimal perl distribution, it's useful to look at
F<t/lib/commonsense.t>.
+=head2 Bundle dual life modules in ext/
+
+For maintenance (and branch merging) reasons, it would be useful to move
+some architecture-independent dual-life modules from lib/ to ext/, if this
+has no negative impact on the build of perl itself.
+
+However, we need to make sure that they are still installed in
+architecture-independent directories by C<make install>.
+
=head2 Improving C<threads::shared>
Investigate whether C<threads::shared> could share aggregates properly with
the perl API that comes from writing modules that use XS to interface to
C.
+=head2 investigate removing int_macro_int from POSIX.xs
+
+As a hang over from the original C<constant> implementation, F<POSIX.xs>
+contains a function C<int_macro_int> which in conjunction with C<AUTOLOAD> is
+used to wrap the C functions C<WEXITSTATUS>, C<WIFEXITED>, C<WIFSIGNALED>,
+C<WIFSTOPPED>, C<WSTOPSIG> and C<WTERMSIG>. It's probably worth replacing
+this complexity with 5 simple direct wrappings of those 5 functions.
+
+However, it would be interesting if someone could measure the memory usage
+before and after, both for the case of C<use POSIX();> and the case of
+actually calling the Perl space functions.
+
+=head2 safely supporting POSIX SA_SIGINFO
+
+Some years ago Jarkko supplied patches to provide support for the POSIX
+SA_SIGINFO feature in Perl, passing the extra data to the Perl signal handler.
+
+Unfortunately, it only works with "unsafe" signals, because under safe
+signals, by the time Perl gets to run the signal handler, the extra
+information has been lost. Moreover, it's not easy to store it somewhere,
+as you can't call mutexs, or do anything else fancy, from inside a signal
+handler.
+
+So it strikes me that we could provide safe SA_SIGINFO support
+
+=over 4
+
+=item 1
+
+Provide global variables for two file descriptors
+
+=item 2
+
+When the first request is made via C<sigaction> for C<SA_SIGINFO>, create a
+pipe, store the reader in one, the writer in the other
+
+=item 3
+
+In the "safe" signal handler (C<Perl_csighandler()>/C<S_raise_signal()>), if
+the C<siginfo_t> pointer non-C<NULL>, and the writer file handle is open,
+
+=over 8
+
+=item 1
+
+serialise signal number, C<struct siginfo_t> (or at least the parts we care
+about) into a small auto char buff
+
+=item 2
+
+C<write()> that (non-blocking) to the writer fd
+
+=over 12
+
+=item 1
+
+if it writes 100%, flag the signal in a counter of "signals on the pipe" akin
+to the current per-signal-number counts
+
+=item 2
+
+if it writes 0%, assume the pipe is full. Flag the data as lost?
+
+=item 3
+
+if it writes partially, croak a panic, as your OS is broken.
+
+=back
+
+=back
+
+=item 4
+
+in the regular C<PERL_ASYNC_CHECK()> processing, if there are "signals on
+the pipe", read the data out, deserialise, build the Perl structures on
+the stack (code in C<Perl_sighandler()>, the "unsafe" handler), and call as
+usual.
+
+=back
+
+I think that this gets us decent C<SA_SIGINFO> support, without the current risk
+of running Perl code inside the signal handler context. (With all the dangers
+of things like C<malloc> corruption that that currently offers us)
+
+For more information see the thread starting with this message:
+http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00305.html
+
=head2 autovivification
Make all autovivification consistent w.r.t LVALUE/RVALUE and strict/no strict;
cause their slabs to be freed, which would eliminate possible memory wastage if
the previous suggestion is implemented, and we swap slabs more frequently.
+=head2 eliminate incorrect line numbers in warnings
+
+This code
+
+ use warnings;
+ my $undef;
+
+ if ($undef == 3) {
+ } elsif ($undef == 0) {
+ }
+
+used to produce this output:
+
+ Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at wrong.pl line 4.
+ Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at wrong.pl line 4.
+
+where the line of the second warning was misreported - it should be line 5.
+Rafael fixed this - the problem arose because there was no nextstate OP
+between the execution of the C<if> and the C<elsif>, hence C<PL_curcop> still
+reports that the currently executing line is line 4. The solution was to inject
+a nextstate OPs for each C<elsif>, although it turned out that the nextstate
+OP needed to be a nulled OP, rather than a live nextstate OP, else other line
+numbers became misreported. (Jenga!)
+
+The problem is more general than C<elsif> (although the C<elsif> case is the
+most common and the most confusing). Ideally this code
+
+ use warnings;
+ my $undef;
+
+ my $a = $undef + 1;
+ my $b
+ = $undef
+ + 1;
+
+would produce this output
+
+ Use of uninitialized value $undef in addition (+) at wrong.pl line 4.
+ Use of uninitialized value $undef in addition (+) at wrong.pl line 7.
+
+(rather than lines 4 and 5), but this would seem to require every OP to carry
+(at least) line number information.
+
+What might work is to have an optional line number in memory just before the
+BASEOP structure, with a flag bit in the op to say whether it's present.
+Initially during compile every OP would carry its line number. Then add a late
+pass to the optimiser (potentially combined with L</repack the optree>) which
+looks at the two ops on every edge of the graph of the execution path. If
+the line number changes, flags the destination OP with this information.
+Once all paths are traced, replace every op with the flag with a
+nextstate-light op (that just updates C<PL_curcop>), which in turn then passes
+control on to the true op. All ops would then be replaced by variants that
+do not store the line number. (Which, logically, why it would work best in
+conjunction with L</repack the optree>, as that is already copying/reallocating
+all the OPs)
+
+(Although I should note that we're not certain that doing this for the general
+case is worth it)
+
=head2 optimize tail-calls
Tail-calls present an opportunity for broadly applicable optimization;
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff