=head1 Tasks that only need Perl knowledge
+=head2 Smartmatch design issues
+
+In 5.10.0 the smartmatch operator C<~~> isn't working quite "right". But
+before we can fix the implementation, we need to define what "right" is.
+The first problem is that Robin Houston implemented the Perl 6 smart match
+spec as of February 2006, when smart match was axiomatically symmetrical:
+L<http://groups.google.com/group/perl.perl6.language/msg/bf2b486f089ad021>
+
+Since then the Perl 6 target moved, but the Perl 5 implementation did not.
+
+So it would be useful for someone to compare the Perl 6 smartmatch table
+as of February 2006 L<http://svn.perl.org/viewvc/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod?view=markup&pathrev=7615>
+and the current table L<http://svn.perl.org/viewvc/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod?revision=14556&view=markup>
+and tabulate the differences in Perl 6. The annotated view of changes is
+L<http://svn.perl.org/viewvc/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod?view=annotate> and the diff is
+C<svn diff -r7615:14556 http://svn.perl.org/perl6/doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod>
+-- search for C<=head1 Smart matching>. (In theory F<viewvc> can generate that,
+but in practice when I tried it hung forever, I assume "thinking")
+
+With that done and published, someone (else) can then map any changed Perl 6
+semantics back to Perl 5, based on how the existing semantics map to Perl 5:
+L<http://search.cpan.org/~rgarcia/perl-5.10.0/pod/perlsyn.pod#Smart_matching_in_detail>
+
+
+There are also some questions that need answering:
+
+=over 4
+
+=item *
+
+How do you negate one? (documentation issue)
+http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-01/msg00071.html
+
+=item *
+
+Array behaviors
+http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2007-12/msg00799.html
+
+* Should smart matches be symmetrical? (Perl 6 says no)
+
+* Other differences between Perl 5 and Perl 6 smart match?
+
+=item *
+
+Objects and smart match
+http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2007-12/msg00865.html
+
+=back
+
=head2 Remove duplication of test setup.
Schwern notes, that there's duplication of code - lots and lots of tests have
into a file, change it to build an C<%Is> hash and require it. Maybe just put
it into F<test.pl>. Throw in the handy tainting subroutines.
-=head2 merge common code in installperl and installman
-
-There are some common subroutines and a common C<BEGIN> block in F<installperl>
-and F<installman>. These should probably be merged. It would also be good to
-check for duplication in all the utility scripts supplied in the source
-tarball. It might be good to move them all to a subdirectory, but this would
-require careful checking to find all places that call them, and change those
-correctly.
-
-=head2 common test code for timed bail out
-
-Write portable self destruct code for tests to stop them burning CPU in
-infinite loops. This needs to avoid using alarm, as some of the tests are
-testing alarm/sleep or timers.
-
=head2 POD -E<gt> HTML conversion in the core still sucks
Which is crazy given just how simple POD purports to be, and how simple HTML
(This probably impacts much more than the core: also the Test::Harness
and TAP::* modules on CPAN.)
-The core regression test suite is getting ever more comprehensive, which has
-the side effect that it takes longer to run. This isn't so good. Investigate
-whether it would be feasible to give the harness script the B<option> of
-running sets of tests in parallel. This would be useful for tests in
-F<t/op/*.t> and F<t/uni/*.t> and maybe some sets of tests in F<lib/>.
-
-Questions to answer
-
-=over 4
-
-=item 1
-
-How does screen layout work when you're running more than one test?
-
-=item 2
-
-How does the caller of test specify how many tests to run in parallel?
-
-=item 3
-
-How do setup/teardown tests identify themselves?
-
-=back
-
-Pugs already does parallel testing - can their approach be re-used?
+All of the tests in F<t/> can now be run in parallel, if C<$ENV{TEST_JOBS}>
+is set. However, tests within each directory in F<ext> and F<lib> are still
+run in series, with directories run in parallel. This is an adequate
+heuristic, but it might be possible to relax it further, and get more
+throughput. Specifically, it would be good to audit all of F<lib/*.t>, and
+make them use C<File::Temp>.
=head2 Make Schwern poorer
To make a minimal perl distribution, it's useful to look at
F<t/lib/commonsense.t>.
-=head2 Improving C<threads::shared>
+=head2 Bundle dual life modules in ext/
-Investigate whether C<threads::shared> could share aggregates properly with
-only Perl level changes to shared.pm
+For maintenance (and branch merging) reasons, it would be useful to move
+some architecture-independent dual-life modules from lib/ to ext/, if this
+has no negative impact on the build of perl itself.
=head2 POSIX memory footprint
There's a similar problem with SelfLoader.
+=head2 profile installman
+
+The F<installman> script is slow. All it is doing text processing, which we're
+told is something Perl is good at. So it would be nice to know what it is doing
+that is taking so much CPU, and where possible address it.
+
+
=head1 Tasks that need a little sysadmin-type knowledge
Or if you prefer, tasks that you would learn from, and broaden your skills
Make F<pod/roffitall> be updated by F<pod/buildtoc>.
+=head2 Split "linker" from "compiler"
+
+Right now, Configure probes for two commands, and sets two variables:
+
+=over 4
+
+=item * C<cc> (in F<cc.U>)
+
+This variable holds the name of a command to execute a C compiler which
+can resolve multiple global references that happen to have the same
+name. Usual values are F<cc> and F<gcc>.
+Fervent ANSI compilers may be called F<c89>. AIX has F<xlc>.
+
+=item * C<ld> (in F<dlsrc.U>)
+
+This variable indicates the program to be used to link
+libraries for dynamic loading. On some systems, it is F<ld>.
+On ELF systems, it should be C<$cc>. Mostly, we'll try to respect
+the hint file setting.
+
+=back
+
+There is an implicit historical assumption from around Perl5.000alpha
+something, that C<$cc> is also the correct command for linking object files
+together to make an executable. This may be true on Unix, but it's not true
+on other platforms, and there are a maze of work arounds in other places (such
+as F<Makefile.SH>) to cope with this.
+
+Ideally, we should create a new variable to hold the name of the executable
+linker program, probe for it in F<Configure>, and centralise all the special
+case logic there or in hints files.
+
+A small bikeshed issue remains - what to call it, given that C<$ld> is already
+taken (arguably for the wrong thing now, but on SunOS 4.1 it is the command
+for creating dynamically-loadable modules) and C<$link> could be confused with
+the Unix command line executable of the same name, which does something
+completely different. Andy Dougherty makes the counter argument "In parrot, I
+tried to call the command used to link object files and libraries into an
+executable F<link>, since that's what my vaguely-remembered DOS and VMS
+experience suggested. I don't think any real confusion has ensued, so it's
+probably a reasonable name for perl5 to use."
+
+"Alas, I've always worried that introducing it would make things worse,
+since now the module building utilities would have to look for
+C<$Config{link}> and institute a fall-back plan if it weren't found."
+Although I can see that as confusing, given that C<$Config{d_link}> is true
+when (hard) links are available.
+
=head1 Tasks that need a little C knowledge
These tasks would need a little C knowledge, but don't need any specific
want to determine what ops I<really> are the most commonly used. And in turn
suggest evictions and promotions to achieve a better F<pp_hot.c>.
+One piece of Perl code that might make a good testbed is F<installman>.
+
=head2 Allocate OPs from arenas
Currently all new OP structures are individually malloc()ed and free()d.
C<MAGIC> is allocated/deallocated more often, but in turn, is also something
more externally visible, so changing the rules here may bite external code.
+=head2 Shared arenas
+
+Several SV body structs are now the same size, notably PVMG and PVGV, PVAV and
+PVHV, and PVCV and PVFM. It should be possible to allocate and return same
+sized bodies from the same actual arena, rather than maintaining one arena for
+each. This could save 4-6K per thread, of memory no longer tied up in the
+not-yet-allocated part of an arena.
+
=head1 Tasks that need a knowledge of XS
the perl API that comes from writing modules that use XS to interface to
C.
+=head2 safely supporting POSIX SA_SIGINFO
+
+Some years ago Jarkko supplied patches to provide support for the POSIX
+SA_SIGINFO feature in Perl, passing the extra data to the Perl signal handler.
+
+Unfortunately, it only works with "unsafe" signals, because under safe
+signals, by the time Perl gets to run the signal handler, the extra
+information has been lost. Moreover, it's not easy to store it somewhere,
+as you can't call mutexs, or do anything else fancy, from inside a signal
+handler.
+
+So it strikes me that we could provide safe SA_SIGINFO support
+
+=over 4
+
+=item 1
+
+Provide global variables for two file descriptors
+
+=item 2
+
+When the first request is made via C<sigaction> for C<SA_SIGINFO>, create a
+pipe, store the reader in one, the writer in the other
+
+=item 3
+
+In the "safe" signal handler (C<Perl_csighandler()>/C<S_raise_signal()>), if
+the C<siginfo_t> pointer non-C<NULL>, and the writer file handle is open,
+
+=over 8
+
+=item 1
+
+serialise signal number, C<struct siginfo_t> (or at least the parts we care
+about) into a small auto char buff
+
+=item 2
+
+C<write()> that (non-blocking) to the writer fd
+
+=over 12
+
+=item 1
+
+if it writes 100%, flag the signal in a counter of "signals on the pipe" akin
+to the current per-signal-number counts
+
+=item 2
+
+if it writes 0%, assume the pipe is full. Flag the data as lost?
+
+=item 3
+
+if it writes partially, croak a panic, as your OS is broken.
+
+=back
+
+=back
+
+=item 4
+
+in the regular C<PERL_ASYNC_CHECK()> processing, if there are "signals on
+the pipe", read the data out, deserialise, build the Perl structures on
+the stack (code in C<Perl_sighandler()>, the "unsafe" handler), and call as
+usual.
+
+=back
+
+I think that this gets us decent C<SA_SIGINFO> support, without the current risk
+of running Perl code inside the signal handler context. (With all the dangers
+of things like C<malloc> corruption that that currently offers us)
+
+For more information see the thread starting with this message:
+http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2008-03/msg00305.html
+
=head2 autovivification
Make all autovivification consistent w.r.t LVALUE/RVALUE and strict/no strict;
The old perltodo notes "Look at the "reification" code in C<av.c>".
-=head2 The yada yada yada operators
-
-Perl 6's Synopsis 3 says:
-
-I<The ... operator is the "yada, yada, yada" list operator, which is used as
-the body in function prototypes. It complains bitterly (by calling fail)
-if it is ever executed. Variant ??? calls warn, and !!! calls die.>
-
-Those would be nice to add to Perl 5. That could be done without new ops.
-
=head2 Virtualize operating system access
Implement a set of "vtables" that virtualizes operating system access
} elsif ($undef == 0) {
}
-produces this output
+used to produce this output:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at wrong.pl line 4.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric eq (==) at wrong.pl line 4.
-Clearly the line of the second warning is misreported - it should be line 5.
-
-The problem arises because there is no nextstate op between the execution of
-the C<if> and the C<elsif>, hence C<PL_curcop> still reports that the currently
-executing line is line 4. The solution might be to inject (somehow) more
-nextstate ops, one for each C<elsif>.
+where the line of the second warning was misreported - it should be line 5.
+Rafael fixed this - the problem arose because there was no nextstate OP
+between the execution of the C<if> and the C<elsif>, hence C<PL_curcop> still
+reports that the currently executing line is line 4. The solution was to inject
+a nextstate OPs for each C<elsif>, although it turned out that the nextstate
+OP needed to be a nulled OP, rather than a live nextstate OP, else other line
+numbers became misreported. (Jenga!)
The problem is more general than C<elsif> (although the C<elsif> case is the
most common and the most confusing). Ideally this code
conjunction with L</repack the optree>, as that is already copying/reallocating
all the OPs)
+(Although I should note that we're not certain that doing this for the general
+case is worth it)
+
=head2 optimize tail-calls
Tail-calls present an opportunity for broadly applicable optimization;
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff