sub myname;
$me = myname $0 or die "can't get myname";
-Note that my() functions as a list operator, not as a unary operator; so
-be careful to use C<or> instead of C<||> in this case. However, if
+Note that myname() functions as a list operator, not as a unary operator;
+so be careful to use C<or> instead of C<||> in this case. However, if
you were to declare the subroutine as C<sub myname ($)>, then
C<myname> would function as a unary operator, so either C<or> or
C<||> would work.
refers to the innermost enclosing loop. This may include dynamically
looking back your call-stack at run time to find the LABEL. Such
desperate behavior triggers a warning if you use the C<use warnings>
-praga or the B<-w> flag.
+pragma or the B<-w> flag.
Unlike a C<foreach> statement, a C<while> statement never implicitly
localises any variables.
=head2 For Loops
-Perl's C-style C<for> loop works exactly like the corresponding C<while> loop;
+Perl's C-style C<for> loop works like the corresponding C<while> loop;
that means that this:
for ($i = 1; $i < 10; $i++) {
$i++;
}
-(There is one minor difference: The first form implies a lexical scope
-for variables declared with C<my> in the initialization expression.)
+There is one minor difference: if variables are declared with C<my>
+in the initialization section of the C<for>, the lexical scope of
+those variables is exactly the C<for> loop (the body of the loop
+and the control sections).
Besides the normal array index looping, C<for> can lend itself
to many other interesting applications. Here's one that avoids the
you can use C<foreach> for readability or C<for> for brevity. (Or because
the Bourne shell is more familiar to you than I<csh>, so writing C<for>
comes more naturally.) If VAR is omitted, C<$_> is set to each value.
-If any element of LIST is an lvalue, you can modify it by modifying VAR
-inside the loop. That's because the C<foreach> loop index variable is
-an implicit alias for each item in the list that you're looping over.
+
+If any element of LIST is an lvalue, you can modify it by modifying
+VAR inside the loop. Conversely, if any element of LIST is NOT an
+lvalue, any attempt to modify that element will fail. In other words,
+the C<foreach> loop index variable is an implicit alias for each item
+in the list that you're looping over.
If any part of LIST is an array, C<foreach> will get very confused if
you add or remove elements within the loop body, for example with
}
There is no official C<switch> statement in Perl, because there are
-already several ways to write the equivalent. In addition to the
-above, you could write
+already several ways to write the equivalent.
+
+However, starting from Perl 5.8 to get switch and case one can use
+the Switch extension and say:
+
+ use Switch;
+
+after which one has switch and case. It is not as fast as it could be
+because it's not really part of the language (it's done using source
+filters) but it is available, and it's very flexible.
+
+In addition to the above BLOCK construct, you could write
SWITCH: {
$abc = 1, last SWITCH if /^abc/;
Or if you are certainly that all the C<&&> clauses are true, you can use
something like this, which "switches" on the value of the
-C<HTTP_USER_AGENT> envariable.
+C<HTTP_USER_AGENT> environment variable.
#!/usr/bin/perl
# pick out jargon file page based on browser
number for the next line, and C<$2> being the optional filename
(specified within quotes).
+There is a fairly obvious gotcha included with the line directive:
+Debuggers and profilers will only show the last source line to appear
+at a particular line number in a given file. Care should be taken not
+to cause line number collisions in code you'd like to debug later.
+
Here are some examples that you should be able to type into your command
shell:
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff