-
=head1 NAME
perlreftut - Mark's very short tutorial about references
One problem that came up all the time in Perl 4 was how to represent a
hash whose values were lists. Perl 4 had hashes, of course, but the
-values had to be scalars; they couldn't be lists.
+values had to be scalars; they couldn't be lists.
Why would you want a hash of lists? Let's take a simple example: You
have a file of city and country names, like this:
$aref = \@array; # $aref now holds a reference to @array
$href = \%hash; # $href now holds a reference to %hash
+ $sref = \$scalar; # $sref now holds a reference to $scalar
Once the reference is stored in a variable like $aref or $href, you
can copy it or store it just the same as any other scalar value:
B<Make Rule 2>
C<[ ITEMS ]> makes a new, anonymous array, and returns a reference to
-that array. C<{ ITEMS }> makes a new, anonymous hash. and returns a
+that array. C<{ ITEMS }> makes a new, anonymous hash, and returns a
reference to that hash.
- $aref = [ 1, "foo", undef, 13 ];
+ $aref = [ 1, "foo", undef, 13 ];
# $aref now holds a reference to an array
- $href = { APR => 4, AUG => 8 };
+ $href = { APR => 4, AUG => 8 };
# $href now holds a reference to a hash
On each line are two expressions that do the same thing. The
-left-hand versions operate on the array C<@a>, and the right-hand
-versions operate on the array that is referred to by C<$aref>, but
-once they find the array they're operating on, they do the same things
-to the arrays.
+left-hand versions operate on the array C<@a>. The right-hand
+versions operate on the array that is referred to by C<$aref>. Once
+they find the array they're operating on, both versions do the same
+things to the arrays.
Using a hash reference is I<exactly> the same:
=head3 B<Use Rule 2>
-B<Use Rule 1> is all you really need, because it tells you how to to
+B<Use Rule 1> is all you really need, because it tells you how to do
absolutely everything you ever need to do with references. But the
most common thing to do with an array or a hash is to extract a single
element, and the B<Use Rule 1> notation is cumbersome. So there is an
or set the element in any row and any column of the array.
The notation still looks a little cumbersome, so there's one more
-abbreviation:
+abbreviation:
=head2 Arrow Rule
%table
- +-------+---+
+ +-------+---+
| | | +-----------+--------+
|Germany| *---->| Frankfurt | Berlin |
| | | +-----------+--------+
We'll look at output first. Supposing we already have this structure,
how do we print it out?
+ 8 foreach $country (sort keys %table) {
+ 9 print "$country: ";
+ 10 my @cities = @{$table{$country}};
+ 11 print join ', ', sort @cities;
+ 12 print ".\n";
+ 13 }
+
C<%table> is an
ordinary hash, and we get a list of keys from it, sort the keys, and
loop over the keys as usual. The only use of references is in line 10.
out as usual.
Lines 2-7 are responsible for building the structure in the first
-place; here they are again:
+place. Here they are again:
2 while (<>) {
3 chomp;
referred-to array.
There's one fine point I skipped. Line 5 is unnecessary, and we can
-get rid of it.
+get rid of it.
2 while (<>) {
3 chomp;
=item *
-In B<USE RULE 1>, you can omit the curly brackets whenever the thing
+In B<Use Rule 1>, you can omit the curly brackets whenever the thing
inside them is an atomic scalar variable like C<$aref>. For example,
C<@$aref> is the same as C<@{$aref}>, and C<$$aref[1]> is the same as
C<${$aref}[1]>. If you're just starting out, you may want to adopt
This doesn't copy the underlying array:
- $aref2 = $aref1;
+ $aref2 = $aref1;
-You get two references to the same array. If you modify
+You get two references to the same array. If you modify
C<< $aref1->[23] >> and then look at
-C<< $aref2->[23] >> you'll see the change.
+C<< $aref2->[23] >> you'll see the change.
To copy the array, use
Similarly, to copy an anonymous hash, you can use
- $href = {%{$href}};
+ $href2 = {%{$href1}};
-=item *
+=item *
-To see if a variable contains a reference, use the `ref' function. It
+To see if a variable contains a reference, use the C<ref> function. It
returns true if its argument is a reference. Actually it's a little
better than that: It returns C<HASH> for hash references and C<ARRAY>
for array references.
-=item *
+=item *
If you try to use a reference like a string, you get strings like
You can use a string as if it were a reference. If you use the string
C<"foo"> as an array reference, it's taken to be a reference to the
-array C<@foo>. This is called a I<soft reference> or I<symbolic reference>.
+array C<@foo>. This is called a I<soft reference> or I<symbolic
+reference>. The declaration C<use strict 'refs'> disables this
+feature, which can cause all sorts of trouble if you use it by accident.
=back
=head1 Credits
-Author: Mark-Jason Dominus, Plover Systems (C<mjd-perl-ref+@plover.com>)
+Author: Mark Jason Dominus, Plover Systems (C<mjd-perl-ref+@plover.com>)
This article originally appeared in I<The Perl Journal>
-( http://www.tpj.com/ ) volume 3, #2. Reprinted with permission.
+( http://www.tpj.com/ ) volume 3, #2. Reprinted with permission.
The original title was I<Understand References Today>.
Copyright 1998 The Perl Journal.
-When included as part of the Standard Version of Perl, or as part of
-its complete documentation whether printed or otherwise, this work may
-be distributed only under the terms of Perl's Artistic License. Any
-distribution of this file or derivatives thereof outside of that
-package require that special arrangements be made with copyright
-holder.
+This documentation is free; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+under the same terms as Perl itself.
Irrespective of its distribution, all code examples in these files are
hereby placed into the public domain. You are permitted and