have been officially "blessed" into a class package.)
Symbolic references are names of variables or other objects, just as a
-symbolic link in a UNIX filesystem contains merely the name of a file.
+symbolic link in a Unix filesystem contains merely the name of a file.
The C<*glob> notation is a kind of symbolic reference. (Symbolic
references are sometimes called "soft references", but please don't call
them that; references are confusing enough without useless synonyms.)
-In contrast, hard references are more like hard links in a UNIX file
+In contrast, hard references are more like hard links in a Unix file
system: They are used to access an underlying object without concern for
what its (other) name is. When the word "reference" is used without an
adjective, like in the following paragraph, it usually is talking about a
doesn't magically start being an array or hash or subroutine; you have to
tell it explicitly to do so, by dereferencing it.
-References can be constructed several ways.
+References can be constructed in several ways.
=over 4
=item 1.
By using the backslash operator on a variable, subroutine, or value.
-(This works much like the & (address-of) operator works in C.) Note
+(This works much like the & (address-of) operator in C.) Note
that this typically creates I<ANOTHER> reference to a variable, because
there's already a reference to the variable in the symbol table. But
the symbol table reference might go away, and you'll still have the
It isn't possible to create a true reference to an IO handle (filehandle or
dirhandle) using the backslash operator. See the explanation of the
*foo{THING} syntax below. (However, you're apt to find Perl code
-out there using globrefs as though they were IO handles, which is
+out there using globrefs as though they were IO handles, which is
grandfathered into continued functioning.)
=item 2.
$arrayref = [1, 2, ['a', 'b', 'c']];
Here we've constructed a reference to an anonymous array of three elements
-whose final element is itself reference to another anonymous array of three
+whose final element is itself a reference to another anonymous array of three
elements. (The multidimensional syntax described later can be used to
access this. For example, after the above, C<$arrayref-E<gt>[2][1]> would have
the value "b".)
as using square brackets--instead it's the same as creating
a list of references!
- @list = (\$a, \@b, \%c);
+ @list = (\$a, \@b, \%c);
@list = \($a, @b, %c); # same thing!
-As a special case, C<\(@foo)> returns a list of references to the contents
+As a special case, C<\(@foo)> returns a list of references to the contents
of C<@foo>, not a reference to C<@foo> itself. Likewise for C<%foo>.
=item 3.
In human terms, it's a funny way of passing arguments to a subroutine when
you define it as well as when you call it. It's useful for setting up
little bits of code to run later, such as callbacks. You can even
-do object-oriented stuff with it, though Perl provides a different
-mechanism to do that already--see L<perlobj>.
+do object-oriented stuff with it, though Perl already provides a different
+mechanism to do that--see L<perlobj>.
You can also think of closure as a way to write a subroutine template without
using eval. (In fact, in version 5.000, eval was the I<only> way to get
the BLOCK can contain any arbitrary expression, in particular,
subscripted expressions:
- &{ $dispatch{$index} }(1,2,3); # call correct routine
+ &{ $dispatch{$index} }(1,2,3); # call correct routine
Because of being able to omit the curlies for the simple case of C<$$x>,
people often make the mistake of viewing the dereferencing symbols as
=item 3.
-The case of individual array elements arises often enough that it gets
-cumbersome to use method 2. As a form of syntactic sugar, the two
-lines like that above can be written:
+Subroutine calls and lookups of individual array elements arise often
+enough that it gets cumbersome to use method 2. As a form of
+syntactic sugar, the examples for method 2 may be written:
- $arrayref->[0] = "January";
- $hashref->{"KEY"} = "VALUE";
+ $arrayref->[0] = "January"; # Array element
+ $hashref->{"KEY"} = "VALUE"; # Hash element
+ $coderef->(1,2,3); # Subroutine call
-The left side of the array can be any expression returning a reference,
+The left side of the arrow can be any expression returning a reference,
including a previous dereference. Note that C<$array[$x]> is I<NOT> the
same thing as C<$array-E<gt>[$x]> here:
use strict 'refs';
and then only hard references will be allowed for the rest of the enclosing
-block. An inner block may countermand that with
+block. An inner block may countermand that with
no strict 'refs';
{
my $value = 20;
print $$ref;
- }
+ }
This will still print 10, not 20. Remember that local() affects package
variables, which are all "global" to the package.
$x{ \$a } = $a;
-If you try to dereference the key, it won't do a hard dereference, and
+If you try to dereference the key, it won't do a hard dereference, and
you won't accomplish what you're attempting. You might want to do something
more like