=head1 NAME
+X<regular expression> X<regex> X<regexp>
perlre - Perl regular expressions
=head1 DESCRIPTION
-This page describes the syntax of regular expressions in Perl. For a
-description of how to I<use> regular expressions in matching
-operations, plus various examples of the same, see discussions
-of C<m//>, C<s///>, C<qr//> and C<??> in L<perlop/"Regexp Quote-Like Operators">.
+This page describes the syntax of regular expressions in Perl.
+
+If you haven't used regular expressions before, a quick-start
+introduction is available in L<perlrequick>, and a longer tutorial
+introduction is available in L<perlretut>.
+
+For reference on how regular expressions are used in matching
+operations, plus various examples of the same, see discussions of
+C<m//>, C<s///>, C<qr//> and C<??> in L<perlop/"Regexp Quote-Like
+Operators">.
Matching operations can have various modifiers. Modifiers
that relate to the interpretation of the regular expression inside
=over 4
=item i
+X</i> X<regex, case-insensitive> X<regexp, case-insensitive>
+X<regular expression, case-insensitive>
Do case-insensitive pattern matching.
locale. See L<perllocale>.
=item m
+X</m> X<regex, multiline> X<regexp, multiline> X<regular expression, multiline>
Treat string as multiple lines. That is, change "^" and "$" from matching
the start or end of the string to matching the start or end of any
line anywhere within the string.
=item s
+X</s> X<regex, single-line> X<regexp, single-line>
+X<regular expression, single-line>
Treat string as single line. That is, change "." to match any character
whatsoever, even a newline, which normally it would not match.
-The C</s> and C</m> modifiers both override the C<$*> setting. That
-is, no matter what C<$*> contains, C</s> without C</m> will force
-"^" to match only at the beginning of the string and "$" to match
-only at the end (or just before a newline at the end) of the string.
-Together, as /ms, they let the "." match any character whatsoever,
-while yet allowing "^" and "$" to match, respectively, just after
+Used together, as /ms, they let the "." match any character whatsoever,
+while still allowing "^" and "$" to match, respectively, just after
and just before newlines within the string.
=item x
+X</x>
Extend your pattern's legibility by permitting whitespace and comments.
pattern delimiter in the comment--perl has no way of knowing you did
not intend to close the pattern early. See the C-comment deletion code
in L<perlop>.
+X</x>
=head2 Regular Expressions
In particular the following metacharacters have their standard I<egrep>-ish
meanings:
+X<metacharacter>
+X<\> X<^> X<.> X<$> X<|> X<(> X<()> X<[> X<[]>
+
\ Quote the next metacharacter
^ Match the beginning of the line
newline within the string, and "$" will match before any newline. At the
cost of a little more overhead, you can do this by using the /m modifier
on the pattern match operator. (Older programs did this by setting C<$*>,
-but this practice is now deprecated.)
+but this practice has been removed in perl 5.9.)
+X<^> X<$> X</m>
To simplify multi-line substitutions, the "." character never matches a
newline unless you use the C</s> modifier, which in effect tells Perl to pretend
-the string is a single line--even if it isn't. The C</s> modifier also
-overrides the setting of C<$*>, in case you have some (badly behaved) older
-code that sets it in another module.
+the string is a single line--even if it isn't.
+X<.> X</s>
The following standard quantifiers are recognized:
+X<metacharacter> X<quantifier> X<*> X<+> X<?> X<{n}> X<{n,}> X<{n,m}>
* Match 0 or more times
+ Match 1 or more times
{n,m} Match at least n but not more than m times
(If a curly bracket occurs in any other context, it is treated
-as a regular character.) The "*" modifier is equivalent to C<{0,}>, the "+"
+as a regular character. In particular, the lower bound
+is not optional.) The "*" modifier is equivalent to C<{0,}>, the "+"
modifier to C<{1,}>, and the "?" modifier to C<{0,1}>. n and m are limited
to integral values less than a preset limit defined when perl is built.
This is usually 32766 on the most common platforms. The actual limit can
be seen in the error message generated by code such as this:
- $_ **= $_ , / {$_} / for 2 .. 42;
+ $_ **= $_ , / {$_} / for 2 .. 42;
By default, a quantified subpattern is "greedy", that is, it will match as
many times as possible (given a particular starting location) while still
allowing the rest of the pattern to match. If you want it to match the
minimum number of times possible, follow the quantifier with a "?". Note
that the meanings don't change, just the "greediness":
+X<metacharacter> X<greedy> X<greedyness>
+X<?> X<*?> X<+?> X<??> X<{n}?> X<{n,}?> X<{n,m}?>
*? Match 0 or more times
+? Match 1 or more times
Because patterns are processed as double quoted strings, the following
also work:
+X<\t> X<\n> X<\r> X<\f> X<\a> X<\l> X<\u> X<\L> X<\U> X<\E> X<\Q>
+X<\0> X<\c> X<\N> X<\x>
\t tab (HT, TAB)
\n newline (LF, NL)
You'll need to write something like C<m/\Quser\E\@\Qhost/>.
In addition, Perl defines the following:
+X<metacharacter>
+X<\w> X<\W> X<\s> X<\S> X<\d> X<\D> X<\X> X<\p> X<\P> X<\C>
+X<word> X<whitespace>
\w Match a "word" character (alphanumeric plus "_")
- \W Match a non-word character
+ \W Match a non-"word" character
\s Match a whitespace character
\S Match a non-whitespace character
\d Match a digit character
\pP Match P, named property. Use \p{Prop} for longer names.
\PP Match non-P
\X Match eXtended Unicode "combining character sequence",
- equivalent to C<(?:\PM\pM*)>
- \C Match a single C char (octet) even under utf8.
-
-A C<\w> matches a single alphanumeric character, not a whole word.
-Use C<\w+> to match a string of Perl-identifier characters (which isn't
-the same as matching an English word). If C<use locale> is in effect, the
-list of alphabetic characters generated by C<\w> is taken from the
-current locale. See L<perllocale>. You may use C<\w>, C<\W>, C<\s>, C<\S>,
-C<\d>, and C<\D> within character classes (though not as either end of
-a range). See L<utf8> for details about C<\pP>, C<\PP>, and C<\X>.
+ equivalent to (?:\PM\pM*)
+ \C Match a single C char (octet) even under Unicode.
+ NOTE: breaks up characters into their UTF-8 bytes,
+ so you may end up with malformed pieces of UTF-8.
+ Unsupported in lookbehind.
+
+A C<\w> matches a single alphanumeric character (an alphabetic
+character, or a decimal digit) or C<_>, not a whole word. Use C<\w+>
+to match a string of Perl-identifier characters (which isn't the same
+as matching an English word). If C<use locale> is in effect, the list
+of alphabetic characters generated by C<\w> is taken from the current
+locale. See L<perllocale>. You may use C<\w>, C<\W>, C<\s>, C<\S>,
+C<\d>, and C<\D> within character classes, but if you try to use them
+as endpoints of a range, that's not a range, the "-" is understood
+literally. If Unicode is in effect, C<\s> matches also "\x{85}",
+"\x{2028}, and "\x{2029}", see L<perlunicode> for more details about
+C<\pP>, C<\PP>, and C<\X>, and L<perluniintro> about Unicode in general.
+You can define your own C<\p> and C<\P> properties, see L<perlunicode>.
+X<\w> X<\W> X<word>
The POSIX character class syntax
+X<character class>
- [:class:]
+ [:class:]
-is also available. The available classes and their \-equivalents
-(if any) are as follows:
+is also available. The available classes and their backslash
+equivalents (if available) are as follows:
+X<character class>
+X<alpha> X<alnum> X<ascii> X<blank> X<cntrl> X<digit> X<graph>
+X<lower> X<print> X<punct> X<space> X<upper> X<word> X<xdigit>
alpha
alnum
ascii
+ blank [1]
cntrl
digit \d
graph
lower
print
punct
- space \s
+ space \s [2]
upper
- word \w
+ word \w [3]
xdigit
-Note that the [] are part of the [::] construct, not part of the whole
-character class. For example:
+=over
+
+=item [1]
+
+A GNU extension equivalent to C<[ \t]>, "all horizontal whitespace".
+
+=item [2]
+
+Not exactly equivalent to C<\s> since the C<[[:space:]]> includes
+also the (very rare) "vertical tabulator", "\ck", chr(11).
+
+=item [3]
- [01[:alpha:]%]
+A Perl extension, see above.
-matches one, zero, any alphabetic character, and the percentage sign.
+=back
+
+For example use C<[:upper:]> to match all the uppercase characters.
+Note that the C<[]> are part of the C<[::]> construct, not part of the
+whole character class. For example:
+
+ [01[:alpha:]%]
+
+matches zero, one, any alphabetic character, and the percentage sign.
+
+The following equivalences to Unicode \p{} constructs and equivalent
+backslash character classes (if available), will hold:
+X<character class> X<\p> X<\p{}>
-The exact meanings of the above classes depend from many things:
-if the C<utf8> pragma is used, the following equivalences to Unicode
-\p{} constructs hold:
+ [:...:] \p{...} backslash
alpha IsAlpha
alnum IsAlnum
ascii IsASCII
+ blank IsSpace
cntrl IsCntrl
- digit IsDigit
+ digit IsDigit \d
graph IsGraph
lower IsLower
print IsPrint
punct IsPunct
space IsSpace
+ IsSpacePerl \s
upper IsUpper
word IsWord
xdigit IsXDigit
-For example, [:lower:] and \p{IsLower} are equivalent.
+For example C<[:lower:]> and C<\p{IsLower}> are equivalent.
If the C<utf8> pragma is not used but the C<locale> pragma is, the
-classes correlate with the isalpha(3) interface (except for `word',
-which is a Perl extension, mirroring \w).
+classes correlate with the usual isalpha(3) interface (except for
+"word" and "blank").
The assumedly non-obviously named classes are:
=over 4
=item cntrl
+X<cntrl>
- Any control character. Usually characters that don't produce
- output as such but instead control the terminal somehow:
- for example newline and backspace are control characters.
- All characters with ord() less than 32 are most often control
- classified as characters.
+Any control character. Usually characters that don't produce output as
+such but instead control the terminal somehow: for example newline and
+backspace are control characters. All characters with ord() less than
+32 are most often classified as control characters (assuming ASCII,
+the ISO Latin character sets, and Unicode), as is the character with
+the ord() value of 127 (C<DEL>).
=item graph
+X<graph>
- Any alphanumeric or punctuation character.
+Any alphanumeric or punctuation (special) character.
=item print
+X<print>
- Any alphanumeric or punctuation character or space.
+Any alphanumeric or punctuation (special) character or the space character.
=item punct
+X<punct>
- Any punctuation character.
+Any punctuation (special) character.
=item xdigit
+X<xdigit>
- Any hexadecimal digit. Though this may feel silly
- (/0-9a-f/i would work just fine) it is included
- for completeness.
-
-=item
+Any hexadecimal digit. Though this may feel silly ([0-9A-Fa-f] would
+work just fine) it is included for completeness.
=back
You can negate the [::] character classes by prefixing the class name
with a '^'. This is a Perl extension. For example:
+X<character class, negation>
- POSIX trad. Perl utf8 Perl
+ POSIX traditional Unicode
[:^digit:] \D \P{IsDigit}
[:^space:] \S \P{IsSpace}
[:^word:] \W \P{IsWord}
-The POSIX character classes [.cc.] and [=cc=] are B<not> supported
-and trying to use them will cause an error.
+Perl respects the POSIX standard in that POSIX character classes are
+only supported within a character class. The POSIX character classes
+[.cc.] and [=cc=] are recognized but B<not> supported and trying to
+use them will cause an error.
Perl defines the following zero-width assertions:
+X<zero-width assertion> X<assertion> X<regex, zero-width assertion>
+X<regexp, zero-width assertion>
+X<regular expression, zero-width assertion>
+X<\b> X<\B> X<\A> X<\Z> X<\z> X<\G>
\b Match a word boundary
\B Match a non-(word boundary)
\A Match only at beginning of string
\Z Match only at end of string, or before newline at the end
\z Match only at end of string
- \G Match only where previous m//g left off (works only with /g)
+ \G Match only at pos() (e.g. at the end-of-match position
+ of prior m//g)
A word boundary (C<\b>) is a spot between two characters
that has a C<\w> on one side of it and a C<\W> on the other side
"^" and "$" will match at every internal line boundary. To match
the actual end of the string and not ignore an optional trailing
newline, use C<\z>.
+X<\b> X<\A> X<\Z> X<\z> X</m>
The C<\G> assertion can be used to chain global matches (using
C<m//g>), as described in L<perlop/"Regexp Quote-Like Operators">.
several patterns that you want to match against consequent substrings
of your string, see the previous reference. The actual location
where C<\G> will match can also be influenced by using C<pos()> as
-an lvalue. See L<perlfunc/pos>.
-
+an lvalue: see L<perlfunc/pos>. Currently C<\G> is only fully
+supported when anchored to the start of the pattern; while it
+is permitted to use it elsewhere, as in C</(?<=\G..)./g>, some
+such uses (C</.\G/g>, for example) currently cause problems, and
+it is recommended that you avoid such usage for now.
+X<\G>
+
The bracketing construct C<( ... )> creates capture buffers. To
-refer to the digit'th buffer use \E<lt>digitE<gt> within the
+refer to the digit'th buffer use \<digit> within the
match. Outside the match use "$" instead of "\". (The
-\E<lt>digitE<gt> notation works in certain circumstances outside
+\<digit> notation works in certain circumstances outside
the match. See the warning below about \1 vs $1 for details.)
Referring back to another part of the match is called a
I<backreference>.
+X<regex, capture buffer> X<regexp, capture buffer>
+X<regular expression, capture buffer> X<backreference>
There is no limit to the number of captured substrings that you may
use. However Perl also uses \10, \11, etc. as aliases for \010,
-\011, etc. (Recall that 0 means octal, so \011 is the 9'th ASCII
-character, a tab.) Perl resolves this ambiguity by interpreting
-\10 as a backreference only if at least 10 left parentheses have
-opened before it. Likewise \11 is a backreference only if at least
-11 left parentheses have opened before it. And so on. \1 through
-\9 are always interpreted as backreferences."
+\011, etc. (Recall that 0 means octal, so \011 is the character at
+number 9 in your coded character set; which would be the 10th character,
+a horizontal tab under ASCII.) Perl resolves this
+ambiguity by interpreting \10 as a backreference only if at least 10
+left parentheses have opened before it. Likewise \11 is a
+backreference only if at least 11 left parentheses have opened
+before it. And so on. \1 through \9 are always interpreted as
+backreferences.
Examples:
if (/(.)\1/) { # find first doubled char
print "'$1' is the first doubled character\n";
}
-
+
if (/Time: (..):(..):(..)/) { # parse out values
$hours = $1;
$minutes = $2;
$seconds = $3;
}
-
+
Several special variables also refer back to portions of the previous
match. C<$+> returns whatever the last bracket match matched.
C<$&> returns the entire matched string. (At one point C<$0> did
also, but now it returns the name of the program.) C<$`> returns
-everything before the matched string. And C<$'> returns everything
-after the matched string.
-
-The numbered variables ($1, $2, $3, etc.) and the related punctuation
-set (C<<$+>, C<$&>, C<$`>, and C<$'>) are all dynamically scoped
+everything before the matched string. C<$'> returns everything
+after the matched string. And C<$^N> contains whatever was matched by
+the most-recently closed group (submatch). C<$^N> can be used in
+extended patterns (see below), for example to assign a submatch to a
+variable.
+X<$+> X<$^N> X<$&> X<$`> X<$'>
+
+The numbered match variables ($1, $2, $3, etc.) and the related punctuation
+set (C<$+>, C<$&>, C<$`>, C<$'>, and C<$^N>) are all dynamically scoped
until the end of the enclosing block or until the next successful
match, whichever comes first. (See L<perlsyn/"Compound Statements">.)
+X<$+> X<$^N> X<$&> X<$`> X<$'>
+X<$1> X<$2> X<$3> X<$4> X<$5> X<$6> X<$7> X<$8> X<$9>
+
+
+B<NOTE>: failed matches in Perl do not reset the match variables,
+which makes it easier to write code that tests for a series of more
+specific cases and remembers the best match.
B<WARNING>: Once Perl sees that you need one of C<$&>, C<$`>, or
C<$'> anywhere in the program, it has to provide them for every
them), once you've used them once, use them at will, because you've
already paid the price. As of 5.005, C<$&> is not so costly as the
other two.
+X<$&> X<$`> X<$'>
Backslashed metacharacters in Perl are alphanumeric, such as C<\b>,
C<\w>, C<\n>. Unlike some other regular expression languages, there
are no backslashed symbols that aren't alphanumeric. So anything
-that looks like \\, \(, \), \E<lt>, \E<gt>, \{, or \} is always
+that looks like \\, \(, \), \<, \>, \{, or \} is always
interpreted as a literal character, not a metacharacter. This was
once used in a common idiom to disable or quote the special meanings
of regular expression metacharacters in a string that you want to
-use for a pattern. Simply quote all non-alphanumeric characters:
+use for a pattern. Simply quote all non-"word" characters:
$pattern =~ s/(\W)/\\$1/g;
+(If C<use locale> is set, then this depends on the current locale.)
Today it is more common to use the quotemeta() function or the C<\Q>
metaquoting escape sequence to disable all metacharacters' special
meanings like this:
/$unquoted\Q$quoted\E$unquoted/
+Beware that if you put literal backslashes (those not inside
+interpolated variables) between C<\Q> and C<\E>, double-quotish
+backslash interpolation may lead to confusing results. If you
+I<need> to use literal backslashes within C<\Q...\E>,
+consult L<perlop/"Gory details of parsing quoted constructs">.
+
=head2 Extended Patterns
Perl also defines a consistent extension syntax for features not
=over 10
=item C<(?#text)>
+X<(?#)>
A comment. The text is ignored. If the C</x> modifier enables
whitespace formatting, a simple C<#> will suffice. Note that Perl closes
C<)> in the comment.
=item C<(?imsx-imsx)>
+X<(?)>
-One or more embedded pattern-match modifiers. This is particularly
-useful for dynamic patterns, such as those read in from a configuration
-file, read in as an argument, are specified in a table somewhere,
-etc. Consider the case that some of which want to be case sensitive
-and some do not. The case insensitive ones need to include merely
-C<(?i)> at the front of the pattern. For example:
+One or more embedded pattern-match modifiers, to be turned on (or
+turned off, if preceded by C<->) for the remainder of the pattern or
+the remainder of the enclosing pattern group (if any). This is
+particularly useful for dynamic patterns, such as those read in from a
+configuration file, read in as an argument, are specified in a table
+somewhere, etc. Consider the case that some of which want to be case
+sensitive and some do not. The case insensitive ones need to include
+merely C<(?i)> at the front of the pattern. For example:
$pattern = "foobar";
if ( /$pattern/i ) { }
$pattern = "(?i)foobar";
if ( /$pattern/ ) { }
-Letters after a C<-> turn those modifiers off. These modifiers are
-localized inside an enclosing group (if any). For example,
+These modifiers are restored at the end of the enclosing group. For example,
( (?i) blah ) \s+ \1
group.
=item C<(?:pattern)>
+X<(?:)>
=item C<(?imsx-imsx:pattern)>
/(?:(?s-i)more.*than).*million/i
=item C<(?=pattern)>
+X<(?=)> X<look-ahead, positive> X<lookahead, positive>
A zero-width positive look-ahead assertion. For example, C</\w+(?=\t)/>
matches a word followed by a tab, without including the tab in C<$&>.
=item C<(?!pattern)>
+X<(?!)> X<look-ahead, negative> X<lookahead, negative>
A zero-width negative look-ahead assertion. For example C</foo(?!bar)/>
matches any occurrence of "foo" that isn't followed by "bar". Note
For look-behind see below.
-=item C<(?E<lt>=pattern)>
+=item C<(?<=pattern)>
+X<(?<=)> X<look-behind, positive> X<lookbehind, positive>
-A zero-width positive look-behind assertion. For example, C</(?E<lt>=\t)\w+/>
+A zero-width positive look-behind assertion. For example, C</(?<=\t)\w+/>
matches a word that follows a tab, without including the tab in C<$&>.
Works only for fixed-width look-behind.
=item C<(?<!pattern)>
+X<(?<!)> X<look-behind, negative> X<lookbehind, negative>
A zero-width negative look-behind assertion. For example C</(?<!bar)foo/>
matches any occurrence of "foo" that does not follow "bar". Works
only for fixed-width look-behind.
=item C<(?{ code })>
+X<(?{})> X<regex, code in> X<regexp, code in> X<regular expression, code in>
B<WARNING>: This extended regular expression feature is considered
highly experimental, and may be changed or deleted without notice.
-This zero-width assertion evaluate any embedded Perl code. It
+This zero-width assertion evaluates any embedded Perl code. It
always succeeds, and its C<code> is not interpolated. Currently,
the rules to determine where the C<code> ends are somewhat convoluted.
+This feature can be used together with the special variable C<$^N> to
+capture the results of submatches in variables without having to keep
+track of the number of nested parentheses. For example:
+
+ $_ = "The brown fox jumps over the lazy dog";
+ /the (\S+)(?{ $color = $^N }) (\S+)(?{ $animal = $^N })/i;
+ print "color = $color, animal = $animal\n";
+
+Inside the C<(?{...})> block, C<$_> refers to the string the regular
+expression is matching against. You can also use C<pos()> to know what is
+the current position of matching within this string.
+
The C<code> is properly scoped in the following sense: If the assertion
is backtracked (compare L<"Backtracking">), all changes introduced after
C<local>ization are undone, so that
you turn on the C<use re 'eval'>, though, it is no longer secure,
so you should only do so if you are also using taint checking.
Better yet, use the carefully constrained evaluation within a Safe
-module. See L<perlsec> for details about both these mechanisms.
+compartment. See L<perlsec> for details about both these mechanisms.
-=item C<(?p{ code })>
+=item C<(??{ code })>
+X<(??{})>
+X<regex, postponed> X<regexp, postponed> X<regular expression, postponed>
+X<regex, recursive> X<regexp, recursive> X<regular expression, recursive>
B<WARNING>: This extended regular expression feature is considered
highly experimental, and may be changed or deleted without notice.
+A simplified version of the syntax may be introduced for commonly
+used idioms.
This is a "postponed" regular subexpression. The C<code> is evaluated
at run time, at the moment this subexpression may match. The result
(?:
(?> [^()]+ ) # Non-parens without backtracking
|
- (?p{ $re }) # Group with matching parens
+ (??{ $re }) # Group with matching parens
)*
\)
}x;
-=item C<(?E<gt>pattern)>
+=item C<< (?>pattern) >>
+X<backtrack> X<backtracking>
B<WARNING>: This extended regular expression feature is considered
highly experimental, and may be changed or deleted without notice.
An "independent" subexpression, one which matches the substring
that a I<standalone> C<pattern> would match if anchored at the given
-position--but it matches no more than this substring. This
+position, and it matches I<nothing other than this substring>. This
construct is useful for optimizations of what would otherwise be
"eternal" matches, because it will not backtrack (see L<"Backtracking">).
+It may also be useful in places where the "grab all you can, and do not
+give anything back" semantic is desirable.
-For example: C<^(?E<gt>a*)ab> will never match, since C<(?E<gt>a*)>
+For example: C<< ^(?>a*)ab >> will never match, since C<< (?>a*) >>
(anchored at the beginning of string, as above) will match I<all>
characters C<a> at the beginning of string, leaving no C<a> for
C<ab> to match. In contrast, C<a*ab> will match the same as C<a+b>,
C<a*ab> will match fewer characters than a standalone C<a*>, since
this makes the tail match.
-An effect similar to C<(?E<gt>pattern)> may be achieved by writing
+An effect similar to C<< (?>pattern) >> may be achieved by writing
C<(?=(pattern))\1>. This matches the same substring as a standalone
C<a+>, and the following C<\1> eats the matched string; it therefore
-makes a zero-length assertion into an analogue of C<(?E<gt>...)>.
+makes a zero-length assertion into an analogue of C<< (?>...) >>.
(The difference between these two constructs is that the second one
uses a capturing group, thus shifting ordinals of backreferences
in the rest of a regular expression.)
m{ \(
(
- [^()]+
+ [^()]+ # x+
|
\( [^()]* \)
)+
m{ \(
(
- (?> [^()]+ )
+ (?> [^()]+ ) # change x+ above to (?> x+ )
|
\( [^()]* \)
)+
\)
}x
-which uses C<(?E<gt>...)> matches exactly when the one above does (verifying
+which uses C<< (?>...) >> matches exactly when the one above does (verifying
this yourself would be a productive exercise), but finishes in a fourth
the time when used on a similar string with 1000000 C<a>s. Be aware,
however, that this pattern currently triggers a warning message under
-B<-w> saying it C<"matches the null string many times">):
+the C<use warnings> pragma or B<-w> switch saying it
+C<"matches null string many times in regex">.
-On simple groups, such as the pattern C<(?E<gt> [^()]+ )>, a comparable
+On simple groups, such as the pattern C<< (?> [^()]+ ) >>, a comparable
effect may be achieved by negative look-ahead, as in C<[^()]+ (?! [^()] )>.
This was only 4 times slower on a string with 1000000 C<a>s.
+The "grab all you can, and do not give anything back" semantic is desirable
+in many situations where on the first sight a simple C<()*> looks like
+the correct solution. Suppose we parse text with comments being delimited
+by C<#> followed by some optional (horizontal) whitespace. Contrary to
+its appearance, C<#[ \t]*> I<is not> the correct subexpression to match
+the comment delimiter, because it may "give up" some whitespace if
+the remainder of the pattern can be made to match that way. The correct
+answer is either one of these:
+
+ (?>#[ \t]*)
+ #[ \t]*(?![ \t])
+
+For example, to grab non-empty comments into $1, one should use either
+one of these:
+
+ / (?> \# [ \t]* ) ( .+ ) /x;
+ / \# [ \t]* ( [^ \t] .* ) /x;
+
+Which one you pick depends on which of these expressions better reflects
+the above specification of comments.
+
=item C<(?(condition)yes-pattern|no-pattern)>
+X<(?()>
=item C<(?(condition)yes-pattern)>
=back
=head2 Backtracking
+X<backtrack> X<backtracking>
+
+NOTE: This section presents an abstract approximation of regular
+expression behavior. For a more rigorous (and complicated) view of
+the rules involved in selecting a match among possible alternatives,
+see L<Combining pieces together>.
A fundamental feature of regular expression matching involves the
notion called I<backtracking>, which is currently used (when needed)
by all regular expression quantifiers, namely C<*>, C<*?>, C<+>,
-C<+?>, C<{n,m}>, and C<{n,m}?>.
+C<+?>, C<{n,m}>, and C<{n,m}?>. Backtracking is often optimized
+internally, but the general principle outlined here is valid.
For a regular expression to match, the I<entire> regular expression must
match, not just part of it. So if the beginning of a pattern containing a
got <d is under the >
Here's another example: let's say you'd like to match a number at the end
-of a string, and you also want to keep the preceding part the match.
+of a string, and you also want to keep the preceding part of the match.
So you write this:
$_ = "I have 2 numbers: 53147";
know which variety of success you will achieve.
When using look-ahead assertions and negations, this can all get even
-tricker. Imagine you'd like to find a sequence of non-digits not
+trickier. Imagine you'd like to find a sequence of non-digits not
followed by "123". You might try to write that as
$_ = "ABC123";
But that isn't going to match; at least, not the way you're hoping. It
claims that there is no 123 in the string. Here's a clearer picture of
-why it that pattern matches, contrary to popular expectations:
+why that pattern matches, contrary to popular expectations:
- $x = 'ABC123' ;
- $y = 'ABC445' ;
+ $x = 'ABC123';
+ $y = 'ABC445';
- print "1: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/ ;
- print "2: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/ ;
+ print "1: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/;
+ print "2: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(ABC)(?!123)/;
- print "3: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/ ;
- print "4: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/ ;
+ print "3: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/;
+ print "4: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?!123)/;
This prints
of the string in their match. So rewriting this way produces what
you'd expect; that is, case 5 will fail, but case 6 succeeds:
- print "5: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/ ;
- print "6: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/ ;
+ print "5: got $1\n" if $x =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/;
+ print "6: got $1\n" if $y =~ /^(\D*)(?=\d)(?!123)/;
6: got ABC
B<WARNING>: particularly complicated regular expressions can take
exponential time to solve because of the immense number of possible
-ways they can use backtracking to try match. For example, this will
-take a painfully long time to run
-
- /((a{0,5}){0,5}){0,5}/
-
-And if you used C<*>'s instead of limiting it to 0 through 5 matches,
-then it would take forever--or until you ran out of stack space.
-
-A powerful tool for optimizing such beasts is "independent" groups,
-which do not backtrace (see L<C<(?E<gt>pattern)>>). Note also that
-zero-length look-ahead/look-behind assertions will not backtrace to make
+ways they can use backtracking to try match. For example, without
+internal optimizations done by the regular expression engine, this will
+take a painfully long time to run:
+
+ 'aaaaaaaaaaaa' =~ /((a{0,5}){0,5})*[c]/
+
+And if you used C<*>'s in the internal groups instead of limiting them
+to 0 through 5 matches, then it would take forever--or until you ran
+out of stack space. Moreover, these internal optimizations are not
+always applicable. For example, if you put C<{0,5}> instead of C<*>
+on the external group, no current optimization is applicable, and the
+match takes a long time to finish.
+
+A powerful tool for optimizing such beasts is what is known as an
+"independent group",
+which does not backtrack (see L<C<< (?>pattern) >>>). Note also that
+zero-length look-ahead/look-behind assertions will not backtrack to make
the tail match, since they are in "logical" context: only
whether they match is considered relevant. For an example
-where side-effects of a look-ahead I<might> have influenced the
-following match, see L<C<(?E<gt>pattern)>>.
+where side-effects of look-ahead I<might> have influenced the
+following match, see L<C<< (?>pattern) >>>.
=head2 Version 8 Regular Expressions
+X<regular expression, version 8> X<regex, version 8> X<regexp, version 8>
In case you're not familiar with the "regular" Version 8 regex
routines, here are the pattern-matching rules not described above.
first character after the "[" is "^", the class matches any character not
in the list. Within a list, the "-" character specifies a
range, so that C<a-z> represents all characters between "a" and "z",
-inclusive. If you want "-" itself to be a member of a class, put it
-at the start or end of the list, or escape it with a backslash. (The
+inclusive. If you want either "-" or "]" itself to be a member of a
+class, put it at the start of the list (possibly after a "^"), or
+escape it with a backslash. "-" is also taken literally when it is
+at the end of the list, just before the closing "]". (The
following all specify the same class of three characters: C<[-az]>,
C<[az-]>, and C<[a\-z]>. All are different from C<[a-z]>, which
-specifies a class containing twenty-six characters.)
+specifies a class containing twenty-six characters, even on EBCDIC
+based coded character sets.) Also, if you try to use the character
+classes C<\w>, C<\W>, C<\s>, C<\S>, C<\d>, or C<\D> as endpoints of
+a range, that's not a range, the "-" is understood literally.
Note also that the whole range idea is rather unportable between
character sets--and even within character sets they may cause results
Characters may be specified using a metacharacter syntax much like that
used in C: "\n" matches a newline, "\t" a tab, "\r" a carriage return,
"\f" a form feed, etc. More generally, \I<nnn>, where I<nnn> is a string
-of octal digits, matches the character whose ASCII value is I<nnn>.
-Similarly, \xI<nn>, where I<nn> are hexadecimal digits, matches the
-character whose ASCII value is I<nn>. The expression \cI<x> matches the
-ASCII character control-I<x>. Finally, the "." metacharacter matches any
-character except "\n" (unless you use C</s>).
+of octal digits, matches the character whose coded character set value
+is I<nnn>. Similarly, \xI<nn>, where I<nn> are hexadecimal digits,
+matches the character whose numeric value is I<nn>. The expression \cI<x>
+matches the character control-I<x>. Finally, the "." metacharacter
+matches any character except "\n" (unless you use C</s>).
You can specify a series of alternatives for a pattern using "|" to
separate them, so that C<fee|fie|foe> will match any of "fee", "fie",
This is grandfathered for the RHS of a substitute to avoid shocking the
B<sed> addicts, but it's a dirty habit to get into. That's because in
-PerlThink, the righthand side of a C<s///> is a double-quoted string. C<\1> in
+PerlThink, the righthand side of an C<s///> is a double-quoted string. C<\1> in
the usual double-quoted string means a control-A. The customary Unix
meaning of C<\1> is kludged in for C<s///>. However, if you get into the habit
of doing that, you get yourself into trouble if you then add an C</e>
@chars = split //, $string; # // is not magic in split
($whitewashed = $string) =~ s/()/ /g; # parens avoid magic s// /
-Thus Perl allows the C</()/> construct, which I<forcefully breaks
+Thus Perl allows such constructs, by I<forcefully breaking
the infinite loop>. The rules for this are different for lower-level
loops given by the greedy modifiers C<*+{}>, and for higher-level
ones like the C</g> modifier or split() operator.
$_ = 'bar';
s/\w??/<$&>/g;
-results in C<"<><b><><a><><r><>">. At each position of the string the best
+results in C<< <><b><><a><><r><> >>. At each position of the string the best
match given by non-greedy C<??> is the zero-length match, and the I<second
best> match is what is matched by C<\w>. Thus zero-length matches
alternate with one-character-long matches.
The additional state of being I<matched with zero-length> is associated with
the matched string, and is reset by each assignment to pos().
+Zero-length matches at the end of the previous match are ignored
+during C<split>.
+
+=head2 Combining pieces together
+
+Each of the elementary pieces of regular expressions which were described
+before (such as C<ab> or C<\Z>) could match at most one substring
+at the given position of the input string. However, in a typical regular
+expression these elementary pieces are combined into more complicated
+patterns using combining operators C<ST>, C<S|T>, C<S*> etc
+(in these examples C<S> and C<T> are regular subexpressions).
+
+Such combinations can include alternatives, leading to a problem of choice:
+if we match a regular expression C<a|ab> against C<"abc">, will it match
+substring C<"a"> or C<"ab">? One way to describe which substring is
+actually matched is the concept of backtracking (see L<"Backtracking">).
+However, this description is too low-level and makes you think
+in terms of a particular implementation.
+
+Another description starts with notions of "better"/"worse". All the
+substrings which may be matched by the given regular expression can be
+sorted from the "best" match to the "worst" match, and it is the "best"
+match which is chosen. This substitutes the question of "what is chosen?"
+by the question of "which matches are better, and which are worse?".
+
+Again, for elementary pieces there is no such question, since at most
+one match at a given position is possible. This section describes the
+notion of better/worse for combining operators. In the description
+below C<S> and C<T> are regular subexpressions.
+
+=over 4
+
+=item C<ST>
+
+Consider two possible matches, C<AB> and C<A'B'>, C<A> and C<A'> are
+substrings which can be matched by C<S>, C<B> and C<B'> are substrings
+which can be matched by C<T>.
+
+If C<A> is better match for C<S> than C<A'>, C<AB> is a better
+match than C<A'B'>.
+
+If C<A> and C<A'> coincide: C<AB> is a better match than C<AB'> if
+C<B> is better match for C<T> than C<B'>.
+
+=item C<S|T>
+
+When C<S> can match, it is a better match than when only C<T> can match.
+
+Ordering of two matches for C<S> is the same as for C<S>. Similar for
+two matches for C<T>.
+
+=item C<S{REPEAT_COUNT}>
+
+Matches as C<SSS...S> (repeated as many times as necessary).
+
+=item C<S{min,max}>
+
+Matches as C<S{max}|S{max-1}|...|S{min+1}|S{min}>.
+
+=item C<S{min,max}?>
+
+Matches as C<S{min}|S{min+1}|...|S{max-1}|S{max}>.
+
+=item C<S?>, C<S*>, C<S+>
+
+Same as C<S{0,1}>, C<S{0,BIG_NUMBER}>, C<S{1,BIG_NUMBER}> respectively.
+
+=item C<S??>, C<S*?>, C<S+?>
+
+Same as C<S{0,1}?>, C<S{0,BIG_NUMBER}?>, C<S{1,BIG_NUMBER}?> respectively.
+
+=item C<< (?>S) >>
+
+Matches the best match for C<S> and only that.
+
+=item C<(?=S)>, C<(?<=S)>
+
+Only the best match for C<S> is considered. (This is important only if
+C<S> has capturing parentheses, and backreferences are used somewhere
+else in the whole regular expression.)
+
+=item C<(?!S)>, C<(?<!S)>
+
+For this grouping operator there is no need to describe the ordering, since
+only whether or not C<S> can match is important.
+
+=item C<(??{ EXPR })>
+
+The ordering is the same as for the regular expression which is
+the result of EXPR.
+
+=item C<(?(condition)yes-pattern|no-pattern)>
+
+Recall that which of C<yes-pattern> or C<no-pattern> actually matches is
+already determined. The ordering of the matches is the same as for the
+chosen subexpression.
+
+=back
+
+The above recipes describe the ordering of matches I<at a given position>.
+One more rule is needed to understand how a match is determined for the
+whole regular expression: a match at an earlier position is always better
+than a match at a later position.
=head2 Creating custom RE engines
the functionality of the RE engine.
Suppose that we want to enable a new RE escape-sequence C<\Y|> which
-matches at boundary between white-space characters and non-whitespace
+matches at boundary between whitespace characters and non-whitespace
characters. Note that C<(?=\S)(?<!\S)|(?!\S)(?<=\S)> matches exactly
at these positions, so we want to have each C<\Y|> in the place of the
more complicated version. We can create a module C<customre> to do
sub invalid { die "/$_[0]/: invalid escape '\\$_[1]'"}
- my %rules = ( '\\' => '\\',
+ # We must also take care of not escaping the legitimate \\Y|
+ # sequence, hence the presence of '\\' in the conversion rules.
+ my %rules = ( '\\' => '\\\\',
'Y|' => qr/(?=\S)(?<!\S)|(?!\S)(?<=\S)/ );
sub convert {
my $re = shift;
=head1 BUGS
-This manpage is varies from difficult to understand to completely
-and utterly opaque.
+This document varies from difficult to understand to completely
+and utterly opaque. The wandering prose riddled with jargon is
+hard to fathom in several places.
+
+This document needs a rewrite that separates the tutorial content
+from the reference content.
=head1 SEE ALSO
+L<perlrequick>.
+
+L<perlretut>.
+
L<perlop/"Regexp Quote-Like Operators">.
L<perlop/"Gory details of parsing quoted constructs">.
L<perllocale>.
+L<perlebcdic>.
+
I<Mastering Regular Expressions> by Jeffrey Friedl, published
by O'Reilly and Associates.
projects / p5sagit/p5-mst-13.2.git / blobdiff